X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fdebug.impure.lisp;h=8b27b70042d8e3728105782a37df4ff1a5911b4e;hb=87cd7d9848d9beddbf74e9d56a0c0aea6e189ead;hp=03773346a4e15bf828c2274ec20a6c81ea03e788;hpb=3d2165e67f9ad1443f6e7d8ad24810000b0436e8;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/debug.impure.lisp b/tests/debug.impure.lisp index 0377334..8b27b70 100644 --- a/tests/debug.impure.lisp +++ b/tests/debug.impure.lisp @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ ;;;; more information. (cl:in-package :cl-user) + +;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter +(when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret) + (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)) + ;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right. @@ -38,7 +43,13 @@ ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05) - (t :unknown))) + (t + #+sb-eval + (if (typep fun 'sb-eval::interpreted-function) + (sb-eval::interpreted-function-lambda-list fun) + :unknown) + #-sb-eval + :unknown))) (defun zoop (zeep &key beep) blurp) @@ -81,17 +92,17 @@ (handler-bind ((error (lambda (condition) ;; find the part of the backtrace we're interested in - (let ((backtrace (progn - ;; (backtrace 13) - (member (caar frame-specs) - (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list) - :key #'car - :test #'equal)))) - + (let* ((full-backtrace (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list)) + (backtrace (member (caar frame-specs) full-backtrace + :key #'car + :test #'equal))) + (setf result condition) (unless backtrace - (print :missing-backtrace) + (format t "~&//~S not in backtrace:~% ~S~%" + (caar frame-specs) + full-backtrace) (setf result nil)) ;; check that we have all the frames we wanted @@ -108,12 +119,11 @@ ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in ;; any way. (Depends on running in the main - ;; thread.) - (let ((end (last backtrace 2))) + ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two + ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames. + (let ((end (last backtrace #-win32 2 #+win32 4))) (unless (equal (caar end) - (if *show-entry-point-details* - '(sb-c::tl-xep sb-impl::toplevel-init) - 'sb-impl::toplevel-init)) + 'sb-impl::toplevel-init) (print (list :backtrace-stunted (caar end))) (setf result nil))) (return-from outer-handler))))) @@ -140,7 +150,8 @@ (funcall fun))) (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-346) - :fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 346 + :fails-on '(or :alpha :ppc :sparc :mips + (and :x86-64 (or :freebsd :darwin)))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized)) (list *undefined-function-frame* @@ -148,18 +159,23 @@ ;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux ;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN - (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-356) - :fails-on '(or (and :x86 :linux) :alpha)) + (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353) + ;; This used to have fewer :fails-on features pre-0.9.16.38, + ;; but it turns out that the bug was just being masked by + ;; the presence of the IR1 stepper instrumentation (and + ;; is thus again failing now that the instrumentation is + ;; no more). + :fails-on '(or :x86 :x86-64 :alpha :mips)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) (list *undefined-function-frame* (list '(flet not-optimized)) (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized)))))) -;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the +;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the ;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory, -;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on -;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy +;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on +;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy ;;; says that the Sparc backend (at least for CMUCL) inlines this, so ;;; if SBCL does the same this test is probably not good for the ;;; Sparc. @@ -178,19 +194,24 @@ (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination (funcall fun))) (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-346) - :fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 346 + :fails-on '(or :alpha (and :x86-64 :darwin))) ; bug 346 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized)) (list '(/ 42 &rest) (list '(flet test) #'optimized))))) (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-356) - :fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 356 + :fails-on '(or :alpha (and :x86-64 :darwin))) ; bug 356 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) (list '(/ 42 &rest) '((flet not-optimized)) (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized)))))) (with-test (:name (:throw :no-such-tag) - :fails-on '(or (and :x86 :linux) (and :x86 :freebsd) :alpha :mips)) + :fails-on '(or + (and :x86 :sunos) + (and :x86-64 :darwin) + (and :sparc :linux) + :alpha + :mips)) (progn (defun throw-test () (throw 'no-such-tag t)) @@ -231,112 +252,122 @@ (defbt 5 (&optional (opt (oops))) (list opt)) +(defmacro with-details (bool &body body) + `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool)) + ,@body)) + ;;; FIXME: This test really should be broken into smaller pieces (with-test (:name (:backtrace :misc) - :fails-on '(and :x86 :linux)) - (macrolet ((with-details (bool &body body) - `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool)) - ,@body))) - - ;; TL-XEP - (print :tl-xep) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring - '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring - '((namestring))))) - - - ;; &MORE-PROCESSOR - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) - '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.1) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) - '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.2) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) - '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) - '((bt.1.1 :key)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) - '((bt.1.2 &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) - '((bt.1.3 &rest))))) - - ;; XEP - (print :xep) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 - '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.1) 0 ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 - '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.2) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 - '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 - '((bt.2.1)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 - '((bt.2.2 &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 - '((bt.2.3 &rest))))) - - ;; VARARGS-ENTRY - (print :varargs-entry) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 - '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.1) :key nil)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 - '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.2) :key ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 - '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 - '((bt.3.1 :key nil)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 - '((bt.3.2 :key ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 - '((bt.3.3 &rest))))) - - ;; HAIRY-ARG-PROCESSOR - (print :hairy-args-processor) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 - '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.1) ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 - '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.2) ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 - '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 - '((bt.4.1 ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 - '((bt.4.2 ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 - '((bt.4.3 &rest))))) - - ;; &OPTIONAL-PROCESSOR - (print :optional-processor) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 - '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.1))))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 - '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.2) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 - '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 - '((bt.5.1)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 - '((bt.5.2 &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 - '((bt.5.3 &rest))))))) + :fails-on '(or (and :x86 (or :sunos)) (and :x86-64 :darwin))) + (write-line "//tl-xep") + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring + '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring + '((namestring))))) + + ;; &MORE-PROCESSOR + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) + '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.1) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) + '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.2) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) + '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) + '((bt.1.1 :key)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) + '((bt.1.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) + '((bt.1.3 &rest))))) + + ;; XEP + (write-line "//xep") + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 + '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.1) 0 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 + '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.2) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 + '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 + '((bt.2.1)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 + '((bt.2.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 + '((bt.2.3 &rest))))) + + ;; VARARGS-ENTRY + (write-line "//varargs-entry") + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 + '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.1) :key nil)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 + '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.2) :key ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 + '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 + '((bt.3.1 :key nil)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 + '((bt.3.2 :key ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 + '((bt.3.3 &rest))))) + + ;; HAIRY-ARG-PROCESSOR + (write-line "//hairy-args-processor") + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 + '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.1) ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 + '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.2) ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 + '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 + '((bt.4.1 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 + '((bt.4.2 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 + '((bt.4.3 &rest))))) + + ;; &OPTIONAL-PROCESSOR + (write-line "//optional-processor") + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 + '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.1))))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 + '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.2) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 + '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 + '((bt.5.1)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 + '((bt.5.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 + '((bt.5.3 &rest)))))) + +(write-line "//compile nil") +(defvar *compile-nil-error* (compile nil '(lambda (x) (cons (when x (error "oops")) nil)))) +(defvar *compile-nil-non-tc* (compile nil '(lambda (y) (cons (funcall *compile-nil-error* y) nil)))) +(assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall *compile-nil-non-tc* 13)) + '(((lambda (x)) 13) + ((lambda (y)) 13)))) ;;;; test TRACE (defun trace-this () 'ok) +(defun trace-fact (n) + (if (zerop n) + 1 + (* n (trace-fact (1- n))))) + (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) (trace trace-this) (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this))) @@ -348,9 +379,9 @@ ;;; This is not a WITH-TEST :FAILS-ON PPC DARWIN since there are ;;; suspicions that the breakpoint trace might corrupt the whole image ;;; on that platform. -#-(and (or ppc x86) darwin) +#-(and (or ppc x86 x86-64) darwin) (with-test (:name (trace :encapsulate nil) - :fails-on '(or ppc sparc)) + :fails-on '(or :ppc :sparc :mips)) (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) (trace trace-this :encapsulate nil) (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this))) @@ -358,6 +389,17 @@ (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out)) (assert (search "returned OK" out)))) +#-(and (or ppc x86 x86-64) darwin) +(with-test (:name (trace-recursive :encapsulate nil) + :fails-on '(or :ppc :sparc :mips)) + (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) + (trace trace-fact :encapsulate nil) + (assert (= 120 (trace-fact 5))) + (untrace)))) + (assert (search "TRACE-FACT" out)) + (assert (search "returned 1" out)) + (assert (search "returned 120" out)))) + ;;;; test infinite error protection (defmacro nest-errors (n-levels error-form) @@ -377,6 +419,7 @@ ;; after 50 successful throws to SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-CATCHER sbcl used ;; to halt, it produces so much garbage that's hard to suppress that ;; it is tested only once + (write-line "--HARMLESS BUT ALARMING BACKTRACE COMING UP--") (let ((*debugger-hook* #'erroring-debugger-hook)) (loop repeat 1 do (let ((error-counter 0) @@ -387,7 +430,8 @@ (catch 'sb-impl::toplevel-catcher (nest-errors 20 (error "infinite error ~s" (incf error-counter))) - :normal-exit)))))))) + :normal-exit))))))) + (write-line "--END OF H-B-A-B--")) (enable-debugger) @@ -398,3 +442,5 @@ (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread))) (disable-debugger) + +(write-line "/debug.impure.lisp done")