X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fdebug.impure.lisp;h=c3c5a3b66667dee956da10d113b0eae45d3dd6d8;hb=d6f9676ae94419cb5544c45821a8d31adbc1fbe8;hp=6ff1481e931b66ea1f958f884ad7bc0af3413503;hpb=175c318c892b0627b36fa3c4db66f59680242204;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/debug.impure.lisp b/tests/debug.impure.lisp index 6ff1481..c3c5a3b 100644 --- a/tests/debug.impure.lisp +++ b/tests/debug.impure.lisp @@ -14,6 +14,11 @@ ;;;; more information. (cl:in-package :cl-user) + +;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter +(when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret) + (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)) + ;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right. @@ -38,7 +43,13 @@ ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05) - (t :unknown))) + (t + #+sb-eval + (if (typep fun 'sb-eval::interpreted-function) + (sb-eval::interpreted-function-lambda-list fun) + :unknown) + #-sb-eval + :unknown))) (defun zoop (zeep &key beep) blurp) @@ -50,16 +61,18 @@ ;;; argument of PRINT might be SB-IMPL::OBJECT or SB-KERNEL::OBJ or ;;; whatever. But we do know the general structure that a correct ;;; answer should have, so we can safely do a lot of checks.) -(destructuring-bind (object-sym &optional-sym stream-sym) (get-arglist #'print) - (assert (symbolp object-sym)) - (assert (eql &optional-sym '&optional)) - (assert (symbolp stream-sym))) -(destructuring-bind (dest-sym control-sym &rest-sym format-args-sym) - (get-arglist #'format) - (assert (symbolp dest-sym)) - (assert (symbolp control-sym)) - (assert (eql &rest-sym '&rest)) - (assert (symbolp format-args-sym))) +(with-test (:name :predefined-functions-1) + (destructuring-bind (object-sym &optional-sym stream-sym) (get-arglist #'print) + (assert (symbolp object-sym)) + (assert (eql &optional-sym '&optional)) + (assert (symbolp stream-sym)))) +(with-test (:name :predefined-functions-2) + (destructuring-bind (dest-sym control-sym &rest-sym format-args-sym) + (get-arglist #'format) + (assert (symbolp dest-sym)) + (assert (symbolp control-sym)) + (assert (eql &rest-sym '&rest)) + (assert (symbolp format-args-sym)))) ;;; Check for backtraces generally being correct. Ensure that the ;;; actual backtrace finishes (doesn't signal any errors on its own), @@ -81,19 +94,18 @@ (handler-bind ((error (lambda (condition) ;; find the part of the backtrace we're interested in - (let ((backtrace (progn - ;; (backtrace 13) - (member (caar frame-specs) - (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list) - :key #'car - :test #'equal)))) + (let* ((full-backtrace (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list)) + (backtrace (member (caar frame-specs) full-backtrace + :key #'car + :test #'equal))) (setf result condition) (unless backtrace - (print :missing-backtrace) + (format t "~&//~S not in backtrace:~% ~S~%" + (caar frame-specs) + full-backtrace) (setf result nil)) - ;; check that we have all the frames we wanted (mapcar (lambda (spec frame) @@ -101,21 +113,19 @@ (and (equal (car spec) (car frame)) (args-equal (cdr spec) (cdr frame)))) - (print (list :mismatch spec frame)) + (print (list :wanted spec :got frame)) (setf result nil))) frame-specs backtrace) ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in ;; any way. (Depends on running in the main - ;; thread.) - (let ((end (last backtrace 2))) - (unless (equal (caar end) - (if *show-entry-point-details* - '(sb-c::tl-xep sb-impl::toplevel-init) - 'sb-impl::toplevel-init)) - (print (list :backtrace-stunted (caar end))) - (setf result nil))) + ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two + ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames. + (unless (find '(sb-impl::toplevel-init) backtrace + :test #'equal) + (print (list :backtrace-stunted backtrace)) + (setf result nil)) (return-from outer-handler))))) (funcall test-function))) result))) @@ -139,7 +149,9 @@ (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination (funcall fun))) - (with-test (:fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 346 + (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-346) + :fails-on '(or :alpha :ppc :sparc :mips + (and :x86-64 :freebsd))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized)) (list *undefined-function-frame* @@ -147,17 +159,42 @@ ;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux ;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN - (with-test (:fails-on '(or (and :x86 :linux) :alpha)) + (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353) + ;; This used to have fewer :fails-on features pre-0.9.16.38, + ;; but it turns out that the bug was just being masked by + ;; the presence of the IR1 stepper instrumentation (and + ;; is thus again failing now that the instrumentation is + ;; no more). + :fails-on '(or :alpha :mips :ppc)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) (list *undefined-function-frame* (list '(flet not-optimized)) (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized)))))) -;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the +(with-test (:name :backtrace-interrupted-condition-wait + :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread) + ;; For some unfathomable reason the backtrace becomes + ;; stunted on Darwin, ending at _sigtramp, when we add + ;; :TIMEOUT NIL to the frame we expect. If we leave it out, + ;; the backtrace is fine -- but the test fails. I can only + ;; boggle right now. + :fails-on :darwin) + (let ((m (sb-thread:make-mutex)) + (q (sb-thread:make-waitqueue))) + (assert (verify-backtrace + (lambda () + (sb-thread:with-mutex (m) + (handler-bind ((timeout (lambda (c) + (error "foo")))) + (with-timeout 0.1 + (sb-thread:condition-wait q m))))) + `((sb-thread:condition-wait ,q ,m :timeout nil)))))) + +;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the ;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory, -;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on -;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy +;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on +;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy ;;; says that the Sparc backend (at least for CMUCL) inlines this, so ;;; if SBCL does the same this test is probably not good for the ;;; Sparc. @@ -175,17 +212,23 @@ (test (fun) (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination (funcall fun))) - (with-test (:fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 346 + (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-346) + :fails-on :alpha) ; bug 346 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized)) (list '(/ 42 &rest) (list '(flet test) #'optimized))))) - (with-test (:fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 346 + (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-356) + :fails-on :alpha) ; bug 356 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) (list '(/ 42 &rest) '((flet not-optimized)) (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized)))))) -(with-test (:fails-on '(or (and :x86 :linux) :alpha)) +(with-test (:name (:throw :no-such-tag) + :fails-on '(or + (and :sparc :linux) + :alpha + :mips)) (progn (defun throw-test () (throw 'no-such-tag t)) @@ -226,119 +269,190 @@ (defbt 5 (&optional (opt (oops))) (list opt)) -(with-test (:fails-on '(and :x86 :linux)) - (macrolet ((with-details (bool &body body) - `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool)) - ,@body))) - - ;; TL-XEP - (print :tl-xep) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring - '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring - '((namestring))))) - - - ;; &MORE-PROCESSOR - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) - '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.1) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) - '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.2) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) - '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) - '((bt.1.1 :key)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) - '((bt.1.2 &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) - '((bt.1.3 &rest))))) - - ;; XEP - (print :xep) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 - '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.1) 0 ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 - '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.2) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 - '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 - '((bt.2.1)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 - '((bt.2.2 &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 - '((bt.2.3 &rest))))) - - ;; VARARGS-ENTRY - (print :varargs-entry) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 - '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.1) :key nil)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 - '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.2) :key ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 - '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 - '((bt.3.1 :key nil)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 - '((bt.3.2 :key ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 - '((bt.3.3 &rest))))) - - ;; HAIRY-ARG-PROCESSOR - (print :hairy-args-processor) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 - '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.1) ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 - '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.2) ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 - '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 - '((bt.4.1 ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 - '((bt.4.2 ?)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 - '((bt.4.3 &rest))))) - - ;; &OPTIONAL-PROCESSOR - (print :optional-processor) - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 - '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.1))))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 - '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.2) &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 - '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.3) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 - '((bt.5.1)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 - '((bt.5.2 &rest)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 - '((bt.5.3 &rest))))))) +(defmacro with-details (bool &body body) + `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool)) + ,@body)) + +(defun bug-354 (x) + (error "XEPs in backtraces: ~S" x)) + +(with-test (:name :bug-354) + (with-details t + (assert (not (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) + '((bug-354 &rest) + ((sb-c::tl-xep bug-354) &rest)))))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) '((bug-354 354))))) + +;;; FIXME: This test really should be broken into smaller pieces +(with-test (:name (:backtrace :tl-xep)) + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring + '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring + '((namestring)))))) + +(with-test (:name (:backtrace :more-processor)) + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) + '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.1) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) + '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.2) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) + '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) + '((bt.1.1 :key)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) + '((bt.1.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) + '((bt.1.3 &rest)))))) + +(with-test (:name (:backtrace :xep)) + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 + '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.1) 0 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 + '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.2) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 + '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 + '((bt.2.1)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 + '((bt.2.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 + '((bt.2.3 &rest)))))) + +(with-test (:name (:backtrace :varargs-entry)) + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 + '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.1) :key nil)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 + '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.2) :key ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 + '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 + '((bt.3.1 :key nil)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 + '((bt.3.2 :key ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 + '((bt.3.3 &rest)))))) + +(with-test (:name (:backtrace :hairy-args-processor)) + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 + '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.1) ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 + '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.2) ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 + '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 + '((bt.4.1 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 + '((bt.4.2 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 + '((bt.4.3 &rest)))))) + + +(with-test (:name (:backtrace :optional-processor)) + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 + '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.1))))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 + '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.2) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 + '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 + '((bt.5.1)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 + '((bt.5.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 + '((bt.5.3 &rest)))))) + +(write-line "//compile nil") +(defvar *compile-nil-error* (compile nil '(lambda (x) (cons (when x (error "oops")) nil)))) +(defvar *compile-nil-non-tc* (compile nil '(lambda (y) (cons (funcall *compile-nil-error* y) nil)))) +(with-test (:name (:compile nil)) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall *compile-nil-non-tc* 13)) + '(((lambda (x)) 13) + ((lambda (y)) 13))))) + +(with-test (:name :clos-slot-typecheckfun-named) + (assert + (verify-backtrace + (lambda () + (eval `(locally (declare (optimize safety)) + (defclass clos-typecheck-test () + ((slot :type fixnum))) + (setf (slot-value (make-instance 'clos-typecheck-test) 'slot) t)))) + '(((sb-pcl::slot-typecheck fixnum) t))))) + +(with-test (:name :clos-emf-named) + (assert + (verify-backtrace + (lambda () + (eval `(progn + (defmethod clos-emf-named-test ((x symbol)) x) + (defmethod clos-emf-named-test :before (x) (assert x)) + (clos-emf-named-test nil)))) + '(((sb-pcl::emf clos-emf-named-test) ? ? nil))))) + +(with-test (:name :bug-310173) + (flet ((make-fun (n) + (let* ((names '(a b)) + (req (loop repeat n collect (pop names)))) + (compile nil + `(lambda (,@req &rest rest) + (let ((* *)) ; no tail-call + (apply '/ ,@req rest))))))) + (assert + (verify-backtrace (lambda () + (funcall (make-fun 0) 10 11 0)) + '((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) + (/ 10 11 0) + ((lambda (&rest rest)) 10 11 0)))) + (assert + (verify-backtrace (lambda () + (funcall (make-fun 1) 10 11 0)) + '((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) + (/ 10 11 0) + ((lambda (a &rest rest)) 10 11 0)))) + (assert + (verify-backtrace (lambda () + (funcall (make-fun 2) 10 11 0)) + '((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) + (/ 10 11 0) + ((lambda (a b &rest rest)) 10 11 0)))))) ;;;; test TRACE (defun trace-this () 'ok) -(let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) - (trace trace-this) - (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this))) - (untrace)))) - (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out)) - (assert (search "returned OK" out))) +(defun trace-fact (n) + (if (zerop n) + 1 + (* n (trace-fact (1- n))))) + +(with-test (:name (trace :simple)) + (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) + (trace trace-this) + (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this))) + (untrace)))) + (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out)) + (assert (search "returned OK" out)))) -(with-test (:fails-on '(and :ppc :darwin)) - ;;; bug 379 +;;; bug 379 +;;; This is not a WITH-TEST :FAILS-ON PPC DARWIN since there are +;;; suspicions that the breakpoint trace might corrupt the whole image +;;; on that platform. +(with-test (:name (trace :encapsulate nil) + :fails-on '(or (and :ppc (not :linux)) :sparc :mips) + :broken-on '(or :darwin :sunos)) (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) (trace trace-this :encapsulate nil) (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this))) @@ -346,6 +460,64 @@ (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out)) (assert (search "returned OK" out)))) +(with-test (:name (trace-recursive :encapsulate nil) + :fails-on '(or (and :ppc (not :linux)) :sparc :mips :sunos) + :broken-on '(or :darwin (and :x86 :sunos))) + (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) + (trace trace-fact :encapsulate nil) + (assert (= 120 (trace-fact 5))) + (untrace)))) + (assert (search "TRACE-FACT" out)) + (assert (search "returned 1" out)) + (assert (search "returned 120" out)))) + +(defun trace-and-fmakunbound-this (x) + x) + +(with-test (:name :bug-667657) + (trace trace-and-fmakunbound-this) + (fmakunbound 'trace-and-fmakunbound-this) + (untrace) + (assert (not (trace)))) + +(with-test (:name :bug-414) + (handler-bind ((warning #'error)) + (load (compile-file "bug-414.lisp")) + (disassemble 'bug-414))) + +(with-test (:name :bug-310175 :fails-on '(not :stack-allocatable-lists)) + ;; KLUDGE: Not all DX-enabled platforms DX CONS, and the compiler + ;; transforms two-arg-LIST* (and one-arg-LIST) to CONS. Therefore, + ;; use two-arg-LIST, which should get through to VOP LIST, and thus + ;; stack-allocate on a predictable set of machines. + (let ((dx-arg (list t t))) + (declare (dynamic-extent dx-arg)) + (flet ((dx-arg-backtrace (x) + (declare (optimize (debug 2))) + (prog1 (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list 10) + (assert (sb-debug::stack-allocated-p x))))) + (declare (notinline dx-arg-backtrace)) + (assert (member-if (lambda (frame) + (and (consp frame) + (equal '(flet dx-arg-backtrace) (car frame)) + (notany #'sb-debug::stack-allocated-p (cdr frame)))) + (dx-arg-backtrace dx-arg)))))) + +(with-test (:name :bug-795245) + (assert + (eq :ok + (catch 'done + (handler-bind + ((error (lambda (e) + (declare (ignore e)) + (handler-case + (sb-debug:backtrace 100 (make-broadcast-stream)) + (error () + (throw 'done :error)) + (:no-error () + (throw 'done :ok)))))) + (apply '/= nil 1 2 nil)))))) + ;;;; test infinite error protection (defmacro nest-errors (n-levels error-form) @@ -365,6 +537,7 @@ ;; after 50 successful throws to SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-CATCHER sbcl used ;; to halt, it produces so much garbage that's hard to suppress that ;; it is tested only once + (write-line "--HARMLESS BUT ALARMING BACKTRACE COMING UP--") (let ((*debugger-hook* #'erroring-debugger-hook)) (loop repeat 1 do (let ((error-counter 0) @@ -375,14 +548,20 @@ (catch 'sb-impl::toplevel-catcher (nest-errors 20 (error "infinite error ~s" (incf error-counter))) - :normal-exit)))))))) + :normal-exit))))))) + (write-line "--END OF H-B-A-B--")) -(enable-debugger) +(with-test (:name infinite-error-protection) + (enable-debugger) + (test-inifinite-error-protection)) -(test-inifinite-error-protection) - -#+sb-thread -(let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-inifinite-error-protection))) - (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread))) +(with-test (:name (infinite-error-protection :thread) + :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread)) + (enable-debugger) + (let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-inifinite-error-protection))) + (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread)))) +;; unconditional, in case either previous left it enabled (disable-debugger) + +(write-line "/debug.impure.lisp done")