X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fdebug.impure.lisp;h=dab04812a84a0fb9ed764d73b18696eb7106a6d8;hb=b73291745b3c5924276230eba6768ad5e333d570;hp=9d8c34bdefd3d326fe6e0491a9099748cc02d495;hpb=597c0a46f50ff957a017a2934fde5978096596d9;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/debug.impure.lisp b/tests/debug.impure.lisp index 9d8c34b..dab0481 100644 --- a/tests/debug.impure.lisp +++ b/tests/debug.impure.lisp @@ -17,11 +17,13 @@ ;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter (when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret) - (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)) + (sb-ext:exit :code 104)) ;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right. +(defvar *p* (namestring *load-truename*)) + ;;; FIXME: This should use some get-argslist like functionality that ;;; we actually export. ;;; @@ -132,8 +134,7 @@ (defvar *undefined-function-frame* ;; bug 353 - '(#+(or x86 x86-64) "bogus stack frame" - #-(or x86 x86-64) "undefined function")) + '("undefined function")) ;;; Test for "undefined function" (undefined_tramp) working properly. ;;; Try it with and without tail call elimination, since they can have @@ -150,36 +151,33 @@ (funcall fun))) (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-346) - :fails-on '(or :alpha :ppc :sparc :mips + ;; Failures on ALPHA, SPARC, MIPS, and probably + ;; HPPA are due to not having a full and valid + ;; stack frame for the undefined function frame. + ;; See PPC undefined_tramp for details. + :fails-on '(or :alpha :sparc :mips (and :x86-64 :freebsd))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized)) (list *undefined-function-frame* - (list '(flet test) #'optimized))))) + (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'optimized))))) ;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux ;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN - (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353) - ;; This used to have fewer :fails-on features pre-0.9.16.38, - ;; but it turns out that the bug was just being masked by - ;; the presence of the IR1 stepper instrumentation (and - ;; is thus again failing now that the instrumentation is - ;; no more). - :fails-on '(or :alpha :mips :ppc)) + (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) (list *undefined-function-frame* - (list '(flet not-optimized)) - (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized)))))) + (list `(flet not-optimized :in ,*p*)) + (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'not-optimized)))))) (with-test (:name :backtrace-interrupted-condition-wait :skipped-on '(not :sb-thread) ;; For some unfathomable reason the backtrace becomes - ;; stunted on Darwin, ending at _sigtramp, when we add - ;; :TIMEOUT NIL to the frame we expect. If we leave it out, - ;; the backtrace is fine -- but the test fails. I can only - ;; boggle right now. - :fails-on :darwin) + ;; stunted, ending at _sigtramp, when we add :TIMEOUT NIL to + ;; the frame we expect. If we leave it out, the backtrace is + ;; fine -- but the test fails. I can only boggle right now. + :fails-on '(and :x86 :linux)) (let ((m (sb-thread:make-mutex)) (q (sb-thread:make-waitqueue))) (assert (verify-backtrace @@ -216,13 +214,13 @@ :fails-on :alpha) ; bug 346 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized)) (list '(/ 42 &rest) - (list '(flet test) #'optimized))))) + (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'optimized))))) (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-356) :fails-on :alpha) ; bug 356 (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) (list '(/ 42 &rest) - '((flet not-optimized)) - (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized)))))) + `((flet not-optimized :in ,*p*)) + (list `(flet test :in ,*p*) #'not-optimized)))))) (with-test (:name (:throw :no-such-tag) :fails-on '(or @@ -234,24 +232,48 @@ (throw 'no-such-tag t)) (assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test '((throw-test)))))) +(defun bug-308926 (x) + (let ((v "foo")) + (flet ((bar (z) + (oops v z) + (oops z v))) + (bar x) + (bar v)))) + +(with-test (:name :bug-308926) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-308926 13)) + '(((flet bar :in bug-308926) 13) + (bug-308926 &rest t))))) + ;;; test entry point handling in backtraces (defun oops () (error "oops")) +(with-test (:name :xep-too-many-arguments) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (oops 1 2 3 4 5 6)) + '((oops ? ? ? ? ? ?))))) + (defmacro defbt (n ll &body body) - `(progn - ;; normal debug info - (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll - ,@body) - ;; no arguments saved - (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll - (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3))) - ,@body) - ;; no lambda-list saved - (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll - (declare (optimize (debug 0))) - ,@body))) + ;; WTF is this? This is a way to make these tests not depend so much on the + ;; details of LOAD/EVAL. Around 1.0.57 we changed %SIMPLE-EVAL to be + ;; slightly smarter, which meant that things which used to have xeps + ;; suddently had tl-xeps, etc. This takes care of that. + `(funcall + (compile nil + '(lambda () + (progn + ;; normal debug info + (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll + ,@body) + ;; no arguments saved + (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll + (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3))) + ,@body) + ;; no lambda-list saved + (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll + (declare (optimize (debug 0))) + ,@body)))))) (defbt 1 (&key key) (list key)) @@ -378,8 +400,8 @@ (defvar *compile-nil-non-tc* (compile nil '(lambda (y) (cons (funcall *compile-nil-error* y) nil)))) (with-test (:name (:compile nil)) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall *compile-nil-non-tc* 13)) - '(((lambda (x)) 13) - ((lambda (y)) 13))))) + `(((lambda (x) :in ,*p*) 13) + ((lambda (y) :in ,*p*) 13))))) (with-test (:name :clos-slot-typecheckfun-named) (assert @@ -412,21 +434,21 @@ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall (make-fun 0) 10 11 0)) - '((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) + `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) (/ 10 11 0) - ((lambda (&rest rest)) 10 11 0)))) + ((lambda (&rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0)))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall (make-fun 1) 10 11 0)) - '((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) + `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) (/ 10 11 0) - ((lambda (a &rest rest)) 10 11 0)))) + ((lambda (a &rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0)))) (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall (make-fun 2) 10 11 0)) - '((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) + `((sb-kernel:two-arg-/ 10/11 0) (/ 10 11 0) - ((lambda (a b &rest rest)) 10 11 0)))))) + ((lambda (a b &rest rest) :in ,*p*) 10 11 0)))))) ;;;; test TRACE @@ -499,7 +521,8 @@ (declare (notinline dx-arg-backtrace)) (assert (member-if (lambda (frame) (and (consp frame) - (equal '(flet dx-arg-backtrace) (car frame)) + (consp (car frame)) + (equal '(flet dx-arg-backtrace :in) (butlast (car frame))) (notany #'sb-debug::stack-allocated-p (cdr frame)))) (dx-arg-backtrace dx-arg)))))) @@ -576,4 +599,149 @@ (sb-kernel:get-lisp-obj-address #'identity)))))) +;;; Older CHENEYGC systems didn't perform any real pointer validity +;;; checks beyond "is this pointer to somewhere in heap space". +(with-test (:name (make-lisp-obj :pointer-validation)) + ;; Fun and games: We need to test MAKE-LISP-OBJ with a known-bogus + ;; address, but we also need the GC to not pitch a fit if it sees an + ;; object with said bogus address. Thus, construct our known-bogus + ;; object within an area of unboxed storage (a vector) in static + ;; space. We'll make it a simple object, (CONS 0 0), which has an + ;; in-memory representation of two consecutive zero words. We + ;; allocate a three-word vector so that we can guarantee a + ;; double-word aligned double-word of zeros no matter what happens + ;; with the vector-data-offset (currently double-word aligned). + (let* ((memory (sb-int:make-static-vector 3 :element-type `(unsigned-byte ,sb-vm:n-word-bits) + :initial-element 0)) + (vector-data-address (sb-sys:sap-int (sb-kernel::vector-sap memory))) + (object-base-address (logandc2 (+ vector-data-address sb-vm:lowtag-mask) sb-vm:lowtag-mask)) + (object-tagged-address (+ object-base-address sb-vm:list-pointer-lowtag))) + (multiple-value-bind (object valid-p) + (sb-kernel:make-lisp-obj object-tagged-address nil) + (declare (ignore object)) + (assert (not valid-p))))) + +(defun test-debugger (control form &rest targets) + (let ((out (make-string-output-stream)) + (oops t)) + (unwind-protect + (progn + (with-simple-restart (debugger-test-done! "Debugger Test Done!") + (let* ((*debug-io* (make-two-way-stream + (make-string-input-stream control) + (make-broadcast-stream out #+nil *standard-output*))) + ;; Initial announcement goes to *ERROR-OUTPUT* + (*error-output* *debug-io*) + (*invoke-debugger-hook* nil)) + (handler-bind ((error #'invoke-debugger)) + (eval form)))) + (setf oops nil)) + (when oops + (error "Uncontrolled unwind from debugger test."))) + ;; For sanity's sake this is outside the *debug-io* rebinding -- otherwise + ;; it could swallow our asserts! + (with-input-from-string (s (get-output-stream-string out)) + (loop for line = (read-line s nil) + while line + do (assert targets) + #+nil + (format *error-output* "Got: ~A~%" line) + (let ((match (pop targets))) + (if (eq '* match) + ;; Whatever, till the next line matches. + (let ((text (pop targets))) + #+nil + (format *error-output* "Looking for: ~A~%" text) + (unless (search text line) + (push text targets) + (push match targets))) + (unless (search match line) + (format *error-output* "~&Wanted: ~S~% Got: ~S~%" match line) + (setf oops t)))))) + ;; Check that we saw everything we wanted + (when targets + (error "Missed: ~S" targets)) + (assert (not oops)))) + +(with-test (:name (:debugger :source 1)) + (test-debugger + "d + source 0 + debugger-test-done!" + `(progn + (defun this-will-break (x) + (declare (optimize debug)) + (let* ((y (- x x)) + (z (/ x y))) + (+ x z))) + (this-will-break 1)) + '* + "debugger invoked" + '* + "DIVISION-BY-ZERO" + "operands (1 0)" + '* + "INTEGER-/-INTEGER" + "(THIS-WILL-BREAK 1)" + "1]" + "(/ X Y)" + "1]")) + +(with-test (:name (:debugger :source 2)) + (test-debugger + "d + source 0 + debugger-test-done!" + `(locally (declare (optimize (speed 0) (safety 3) (debug 3))) + (let ((f #'(lambda (x cont) + (print x (make-broadcast-stream)) + (if (zerop x) + (error "~%foo") + (funcall cont (1- x) cont))))) + (funcall f 10 f))) + '* + "debugger" + '* + "foo" + '* + "source: (ERROR \"~%foo\")" + '* + "(LAMBDA (X CONT)" + '* + "(FUNCALL CONT (1- X) CONT)" + "1]")) + +(with-test (:name (disassemble :high-debug-eval)) + (eval `(defun this-will-be-disassembled (x) + (declare (optimize debug)) + (+ x x))) + (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream)) + (disassembly + (let ((*error-output* oopses)) + (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*) + (disassemble 'this-will-be-disassembled))))) + (with-input-from-string (s disassembly) + (assert (search "; disassembly for THIS-WILL-BE-DISASSEMBLED" + (read-line s)))) + (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses))) + (unless (zerop (length problems)) + (error problems))))) + +(defun this-too-will-be-disasssembled (x) + (declare (optimize debug)) + (+ x x)) + +(with-test (:name (disassemble :high-debug-load)) + (let* ((oopses (make-string-output-stream)) + (disassembly + (let ((*error-output* oopses)) + (with-output-to-string (*standard-output*) + (disassemble 'this-too-will-be-disasssembled))))) + (with-input-from-string (s disassembly) + (assert (equal "; disassembly for THIS-TOO-WILL-BE-DISASSSEMBLED" + (read-line s)))) + (let ((problems (get-output-stream-string oopses))) + (unless (zerop (length problems)) + (error problems))))) + (write-line "/debug.impure.lisp done")