X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fdebug.impure.lisp;h=ea5d8b7160933bee458796bce84972d1a8d35a3a;hb=b66385e2031fc2cac17dd129df0af400beb48a22;hp=2dbf94ea804cd9880b1c51a4b1ab03ee2d13ade1;hpb=f78c1fecf191e147ca081026cc11f2683ee80905;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/debug.impure.lisp b/tests/debug.impure.lisp index 2dbf94e..ea5d8b7 100644 --- a/tests/debug.impure.lisp +++ b/tests/debug.impure.lisp @@ -1,5 +1,5 @@ ;;;; This file is for testing debugging functionality, using -;;;; test machinery which might have side effects (e.g. +;;;; test machinery which might have side effects (e.g. ;;;; executing DEFUN). ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for @@ -8,12 +8,17 @@ ;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test ;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork ;;;; from CMU CL. -;;;; +;;;; ;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with ;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for ;;;; more information. (cl:in-package :cl-user) + +;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter +(when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret) + (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)) + ;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right. @@ -29,7 +34,7 @@ (#.sb-vm:simple-fun-header-widetag (sb-kernel:%simple-fun-arglist fun)) (#.sb-vm:closure-header-widetag (get-arglist - (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun))) + (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun))) ;; In code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-fun), we use a scheme ;; like above, and it seems to work. -- MNA 2001-06-12 ;; @@ -38,7 +43,13 @@ ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05) - (t :unknown))) + (t + #+sb-eval + (if (typep fun 'sb-eval::interpreted-function) + (sb-eval::interpreted-function-lambda-list fun) + :unknown) + #-sb-eval + :unknown))) (defun zoop (zeep &key beep) blurp) @@ -68,10 +79,10 @@ ;;; and hasn't been cut off anywhere. (defun verify-backtrace (test-function frame-specs &key (allow-stunted nil)) (labels ((args-equal (want real) - (cond ((endp want) - (endp real)) - ((eq '&rest (car want)) + (cond ((eq '&rest (car want)) t) + ((endp want) + (endp real)) ((or (eq '? (car want)) (equal (car want) (car real))) (args-equal (cdr want) (cdr real))) (t @@ -87,30 +98,30 @@ (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list) :key #'car :test #'equal)))) - + (setf result condition) - + (unless backtrace (print :missing-backtrace) (setf result nil)) - + ;; check that we have all the frames we wanted - (mapcar + (mapcar (lambda (spec frame) (unless (or (not spec) (and (equal (car spec) (car frame)) - (args-equal (cdr spec) + (args-equal (cdr spec) (cdr frame)))) (print (list :mismatch spec frame)) (setf result nil))) frame-specs backtrace) - + ;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in ;; any way. (Depends on running in the main ;; thread.) (let ((end (last backtrace 2))) - (unless (equal (caar end) + (unless (equal (caar end) (if *show-entry-point-details* '(sb-c::tl-xep sb-impl::toplevel-init) 'sb-impl::toplevel-init)) @@ -125,7 +136,6 @@ '(#+(or x86 x86-64) "bogus stack frame" #-(or x86 x86-64) "undefined function")) -#-(or alpha) ; bug 346 ;;; Test for "undefined function" (undefined_tramp) working properly. ;;; Try it with and without tail call elimination, since they can have ;;; different effects. (Specifically, if undefined_tramp is incorrect @@ -140,19 +150,28 @@ (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination (funcall fun))) - (assert (verify-backtrace - (lambda () (test #'optimized)) - (list *undefined-function-frame* - (list '(flet test) #'optimized)))) - - #-x86 ; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN - (assert (verify-backtrace - (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) - (list *undefined-function-frame* - (list '(flet not-optimized)) - (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))) - -#-alpha ; bug 346 + (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-346) + :fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 346 + (assert (verify-backtrace + (lambda () (test #'optimized)) + (list *undefined-function-frame* + (list '(flet test) #'optimized))))) + + ;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux + ;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN + (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353) + ;; This used to have fewer :fails-on features pre-0.9.16.38, + ;; but it turns out that the bug was just being masked by + ;; the presence of the IR1 stepper instrumentation (and + ;; is thus again failing now that the instrumentation is + ;; no more). + :fails-on '(or :x86 :x86-64 :alpha)) + (assert (verify-backtrace + (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) + (list *undefined-function-frame* + (list '(flet not-optimized)) + (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized)))))) + ;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the ;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory, ;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on @@ -174,93 +193,243 @@ (test (fun) (declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination (funcall fun))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized)) - (list '(/ 42 &rest) - (list '(flet test) #'optimized)))) - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) - (list '(/ 42 &rest) - '((flet not-optimized)) - (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))) - -#-(or alpha (and x86 linux)) ; bug 61 -(progn - (defun throw-test () - (throw 'no-such-tag t)) - (assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test '((throw-test))))) + (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-346) + :fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 346 + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized)) + (list '(/ 42 &rest) + (list '(flet test) #'optimized))))) + (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-356) + :fails-on '(or :alpha)) ; bug 356 + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized)) + (list '(/ 42 &rest) + '((flet not-optimized)) + (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized)))))) + +(with-test (:name (:throw :no-such-tag) + :fails-on '(or + (and :x86 (or :linux :freebsd sunos)) + :alpha + :mips)) + (progn + (defun throw-test () + (throw 'no-such-tag t)) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test '((throw-test)))))) ;;; test entry point handling in backtraces (defun oops () (error "oops")) -(defun bt.1 (&key key) +(defmacro defbt (n ll &body body) + `(progn + ;; normal debug info + (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll + ,@body) + ;; no arguments saved + (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll + (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3))) + ,@body) + ;; no lambda-list saved + (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll + (declare (optimize (debug 0))) + ,@body))) + +(defbt 1 (&key key) (list key)) -(defun bt.2 (x) +(defbt 2 (x) (list x)) -(defun bt.3 (&key (key (oops))) +(defbt 3 (&key (key (oops))) (list key)) ;;; ERROR instead of OOPS so that tail call elimination doesn't happen -(defun bt.4 (&optional opt) +(defbt 4 (&optional opt) (list (error "error"))) -(defun bt.5 (&optional (opt (oops))) +(defbt 5 (&optional (opt (oops))) (list opt)) -#-(and x86 linux) -(macrolet ((with-details (bool &body body) - `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool)) - ,@body))) - - ;; &MORE-PROCESSOR - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1 :key)) - '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1) &rest))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1 :key)) - '((bt.1 :key))))) - - ;; XEP - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2 - '(((sb-c::xep bt.2) 0 ?))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2 - '((bt.2))))) - - ;; TL-XEP - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring - '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring - '((namestring))))) - - ;; VARARGS-ENTRY - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3 - '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3) :key nil))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3 - '((bt.3 :key nil))))) - - ;; HAIRY-ARG-PROCESSOR - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4 - '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4) ?))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4 - '((bt.4 ?))))) - - ;; &OPTIONAL-PROCESSOR - (with-details t - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5 - '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5)))))) - (with-details nil - (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5 - '((bt.5)))))) - -;;; success -(quit :unix-status 104) +;;; FIXME: This test really should be broken into smaller pieces +(with-test (:name (:backtrace :misc) + :fails-on '(and :x86 (or :linux :sunos))) + (macrolet ((with-details (bool &body body) + `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool)) + ,@body))) + + ;; TL-XEP + (print :tl-xep) + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring + '(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring + '((namestring))))) + + + ;; &MORE-PROCESSOR + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) + '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.1) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) + '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.2) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) + '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key)) + '((bt.1.1 :key)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key)) + '((bt.1.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key)) + '((bt.1.3 &rest))))) + + ;; XEP + (print :xep) + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 + '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.1) 0 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 + '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.2) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 + '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1 + '((bt.2.1)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2 + '((bt.2.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3 + '((bt.2.3 &rest))))) + + ;; VARARGS-ENTRY + (print :varargs-entry) + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 + '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.1) :key nil)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 + '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.2) :key ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 + '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1 + '((bt.3.1 :key nil)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2 + '((bt.3.2 :key ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3 + '((bt.3.3 &rest))))) + + ;; HAIRY-ARG-PROCESSOR + (print :hairy-args-processor) + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 + '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.1) ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 + '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.2) ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 + '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1 + '((bt.4.1 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2 + '((bt.4.2 ?)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3 + '((bt.4.3 &rest))))) + + ;; &OPTIONAL-PROCESSOR + (print :optional-processor) + (with-details t + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 + '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.1))))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 + '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.2) &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 + '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.3) &rest))))) + (with-details nil + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1 + '((bt.5.1)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2 + '((bt.5.2 &rest)))) + (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3 + '((bt.5.3 &rest))))))) + +;;;; test TRACE + +(defun trace-this () + 'ok) + +(defun trace-fact (n) + (if (zerop n) + 1 + (* n (trace-fact (1- n))))) + +(let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) + (trace trace-this) + (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this))) + (untrace)))) + (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out)) + (assert (search "returned OK" out))) + +;;; bug 379 +;;; This is not a WITH-TEST :FAILS-ON PPC DARWIN since there are +;;; suspicions that the breakpoint trace might corrupt the whole image +;;; on that platform. +#-(and (or ppc x86) darwin) +(with-test (:name (trace :encapsulate nil) + :fails-on '(or :ppc :sparc :mips)) + (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) + (trace trace-this :encapsulate nil) + (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this))) + (untrace)))) + (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out)) + (assert (search "returned OK" out)))) + +#-(and (or ppc x86) darwin) +(with-test (:name (trace-recursive :encapsulate nil) + :fails-on '(or :ppc :sparc :mips)) + (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*) + (trace trace-fact :encapsulate nil) + (assert (= 120 (trace-fact 5))) + (untrace)))) + (assert (search "TRACE-FACT" out)) + (assert (search "returned 1" out)) + (assert (search "returned 120" out)))) + +;;;; test infinite error protection + +(defmacro nest-errors (n-levels error-form) + (if (< 0 n-levels) + `(handler-bind ((error (lambda (condition) + (declare (ignore condition)) + ,error-form))) + (nest-errors ,(1- n-levels) ,error-form)) + error-form)) + +(defun erroring-debugger-hook (condition old-debugger-hook) + (let ((*debugger-hook* old-debugger-hook)) + (format t "recursive condition: ~A~%" condition) (force-output) + (error "recursive condition: ~A" condition))) + +(defun test-inifinite-error-protection () + ;; after 50 successful throws to SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-CATCHER sbcl used + ;; to halt, it produces so much garbage that's hard to suppress that + ;; it is tested only once + (let ((*debugger-hook* #'erroring-debugger-hook)) + (loop repeat 1 do + (let ((error-counter 0) + (*terminal-io* (make-broadcast-stream))) + (assert + (not (eq + :normal-exit + (catch 'sb-impl::toplevel-catcher + (nest-errors 20 (error "infinite error ~s" + (incf error-counter))) + :normal-exit)))))))) + +(enable-debugger) + +(test-inifinite-error-protection) + +#+sb-thread +(let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-inifinite-error-protection))) + (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread))) + +(disable-debugger)