X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Finterface.pure.lisp;h=3fb1cf41d2792d9203b9712ac6f7f48b72811f0d;hb=c8218514d751c4d777892b79bbf1ca6597f731c0;hp=3ef66b65b23f161ce60a2ab51f3e7dc5ecef1552;hpb=d171bd26f76aaa12d600542337b4186296c2c03d;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/interface.pure.lisp b/tests/interface.pure.lisp index 3ef66b6..3fb1cf4 100644 --- a/tests/interface.pure.lisp +++ b/tests/interface.pure.lisp @@ -19,18 +19,50 @@ '("SB-ALIEN" "SB-C-CALL" "SB-DEBUG" "SB-EXT" "SB-GRAY" "SB-MP" "SB-PROFILE" "SB-PCL" "COMMON-LISP")) (defun has-arglist-info-p (function) - (and (not (typep function 'sb-c::byte-function)) - (sb-kernel:%function-arglist function))) + (declare (type function function)) + ;; The Lisp-level type FUNCTION can conceal a multitude of sins.. + (case (sb-kernel:get-type function) + ((#.sb-vm:function-header-type #.sb-vm:closure-function-header-type) + (sb-kernel:%function-arglist function)) + (#.sb-vm:closure-header-type (has-arglist-info-p + (sb-kernel:%closure-function + function))) + ;; in code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-function), we use a scheme + ;; like above, and it seems to work. -- MNA 2001-06-12 + ;; + ;; (There might be other cases with arglist info also. + ;; FUNCTION-HEADER-TYPE and CLOSURE-HEADER-TYPE just + ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when + ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %FUNCTION-ARGLIST to + ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05) + (t nil))) (defun check-ext-symbols-arglist (package) (format t "~% looking at package: ~A" package) (do-external-symbols (ext-sym package) (when (fboundp ext-sym) (let ((fun (symbol-function ext-sym))) - (unless (has-arglist-info-p fun) - (error "~%Function ~A (~A) has no argument-list information available, ~%~ - and is probably byte-compiled.~%" ext-sym fun)))))) + (cond ((macro-function ext-sym) + ;; FIXME: Macro functions should have their argument list + ;; information checked separately. Just feeding them into + ;; the ordinary-function logic below doesn't work right, + ;; though, and I haven't figured out what does work + ;; right. For now we just punt. + (values)) + #+nil + ((sb-int:info :function :accessor-for ext-sym) + (values)) + ((typep fun 'generic-function) + (sb-pcl::generic-function-pretty-arglist fun)) + (t + (let ((fun (symbol-function ext-sym))) + (unless (has-arglist-info-p fun) + (error "Function ~A has no arg-list information available." + ext-sym))))))))) (dolist (public-package *public-package-names*) (when (find-package public-package) (check-ext-symbols-arglist public-package))) (terpri) -(print "done with interface.pure.lisp") + +;;; FIXME: It would probably be good to require here that every +;;; external symbol either has a doc string or has some good excuse +;;; (like being an accessor for a structure which has a doc string).