X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Finterface.pure.lisp;h=74ce1e028a888e15664cd24e2cf8b878ddc4c84c;hb=2378406d6eda78090dfe05e372438495aeace5e0;hp=c84cc6343379a6ceed282a839a1e3866f190b5a8;hpb=e92a2f8844d9125e76a4b96dc27b56632bfd85b6;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/interface.pure.lisp b/tests/interface.pure.lisp index c84cc63..74ce1e0 100644 --- a/tests/interface.pure.lisp +++ b/tests/interface.pure.lisp @@ -6,12 +6,16 @@ ;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test ;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork ;;;; from CMU CL. -;;;; +;;;; ;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with ;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for ;;;; more information. (in-package :cl-user) + +(load "test-util.lisp") +(load "compiler-test-util.lisp") +(use-package :test-util) ;;;; properties of symbols, e.g. presence of doc strings for public symbols @@ -25,16 +29,16 @@ ;;; furthermore do the right thing when it gets a package designator. ;;; (bug reported and fixed by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2001-10-17) (assert (< 0 - (length (apropos-list "PRINT" :cl)) - (length (apropos-list "PRINT")))) + (length (apropos-list "PRINT" :cl)) + (length (apropos-list "PRINT")))) ;;; Further, it should correctly deal with the external-only flag (bug ;;; reported by cliini on #lisp IRC 2003-05-30, fixed in sbcl-0.8.0.1x ;;; by CSR) (assert (= (length (apropos-list "" "CL")) - (length (apropos-list "" "CL" t)))) + (length (apropos-list "" "CL" t)))) (assert (< 0 - (length (apropos-list "" "SB-VM" t)) - (length (apropos-list "" "SB-VM")))) + (length (apropos-list "" "SB-VM" t)) + (length (apropos-list "" "SB-VM")))) ;;; DESCRIBE shouldn't fail on rank-0 arrays (bug reported and fixed ;;; by Lutz Euler sbcl-devel 2002-12-03) @@ -55,3 +59,79 @@ ;;; DECLARE should not be a special operator (assert (not (special-operator-p 'declare))) + +;;; WITH-TIMEOUT should accept more than one form in its body. +(with-test (:name :with-timeout-forms) + (handler-bind ((sb-ext:timeout #'continue)) + (sb-ext:with-timeout 3 + (sleep 2) + (sleep 2)))) + +;;; SLEEP should not cons +(with-test (:name (sleep :non-consing) :fails-on '(or (not :x86-64) :win32)) + (ctu:assert-no-consing (sleep 0.00001))) + +;;; SLEEP should work with large integers as well -- no timers +;;; on win32, so don't test there. +(with-test (:name (sleep pretty-much-forever) :skipped-on :win32) + (assert (eq :timeout + (handler-case + (sb-ext:with-timeout 1 + (sleep (ash 1 (* 2 sb-vm:n-word-bits)))) + (sb-ext:timeout () + :timeout))))) + +;;; DOCUMENTATION should return nil, not signal slot-unbound +(documentation 'fixnum 'type) +(documentation 'class 'type) +(documentation (find-class 'class) 'type) +(documentation 'foo 'structure) + +;;; DECODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME should accept second-resolution time-zones. +(macrolet ((test (ut time-zone list) + (destructuring-bind (sec min hr date mon yr day tz) + list + `(multiple-value-bind (sec min hr date mon yr day dst tz) + (decode-universal-time ,ut ,time-zone) + (declare (ignore dst)) + (assert (= sec ,sec)) + (assert (= min ,min)) + (assert (= hr ,hr)) + (assert (= date ,date)) + (assert (= mon ,mon)) + (assert (= yr ,yr)) + (assert (= day ,day)) + (assert (= tz ,tz)))))) + (test (* 86400 365) -1/3600 (1 0 0 1 1 1901 1 -1/3600)) + (test (* 86400 365) 0 (0 0 0 1 1 1901 1 0)) + (test (* 86400 365) 1/3600 (59 59 23 31 12 1900 0 1/3600))) + +;;; DECODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME shouldn't fail when the time is outside UNIX +;;; 32-bit time_t and a timezone wasn't passed +(decode-universal-time 0 nil) + +;;; ENCODE-UNIVERSAL-TIME should be able to encode the universal time +;;; 0 when passed a representation in a timezone where the +;;; representation of 0 as a decoded time is in 1899. +(encode-universal-time 0 0 23 31 12 1899 1) + +;;; DISASSEMBLE shouldn't fail on purified functions +(disassemble 'cl:+) +(disassemble 'sb-ext:run-program) + +;;; minimal test of GC: see stress-gc.{sh,lisp} for a more +;;; comprehensive test. +(loop repeat 2 + do (compile nil '(lambda (x) x)) + do (sb-ext:gc :full t)) + +;;; On x86-64, the instruction definitions for CMP*[PS][SD] were broken +;;; so that the disassembler threw an error when they were used with +;;; one operand in memory. +(with-test (:name :bug-814702) + (disassemble (lambda (x) + (= #C(2.0f0 3.0f0) + (the (complex single-float) x)))) + (disassemble (lambda (x y) + (= (the (complex single-float) x) + (the (complex single-float) y)))))