X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Finterface.pure.lisp;h=858ee3fb2be82f0c59b38754e6c7476348abfcbc;hb=d40a76606c86722b0aef8179155f9f2840739b72;hp=e0b04f9c2165c89ec23d3647d11222d5433f6bd7;hpb=f143939b1dbaf38ebd4f92c851fbc4ecddf37af1;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/interface.pure.lisp b/tests/interface.pure.lisp index e0b04f9..858ee3f 100644 --- a/tests/interface.pure.lisp +++ b/tests/interface.pure.lisp @@ -1,3 +1,5 @@ +;;;; tests for problems in the interface presented to the user/programmer + ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for ;;;; more information. ;;;; @@ -10,6 +12,8 @@ ;;;; more information. (in-package :cl-user) + +;;;; properties of symbols, e.g. presence of doc strings for public symbols ;;; Check for fbound external symbols in public packages that have no ;;; argument list information. (This used to be possible when we got @@ -23,16 +27,16 @@ (defun has-arglist-info-p (fun) (declare (type function fun)) ;; The Lisp-level type FUNCTION can conceal a multitude of sins.. - (case (sb-kernel:get-type fun) - ((#.sb-vm:simple-fun-header-type #.sb-vm:closure-fun-header-type) + (case (sb-kernel:widetag-of fun) + ((#.sb-vm:simple-fun-header-widetag #.sb-vm:closure-fun-header-widetag) (sb-kernel:%simple-fun-arglist fun)) - (#.sb-vm:closure-header-type (has-arglist-info-p - (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun))) - ;; In code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-function), we use a scheme + (#.sb-vm:closure-header-widetag (has-arglist-info-p + (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun))) + ;; In code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-fun), we use a scheme ;; like above, and it seems to work. -- MNA 2001-06-12 ;; ;; (There might be other cases with arglist info also. - ;; SIMPLE-FUN-HEADER-TYPE and CLOSURE-HEADER-TYPE just + ;; SIMPLE-FUN-HEADER-WIDETAG and CLOSURE-HEADER-WIDETAG just ;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when ;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to ;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05) @@ -49,9 +53,6 @@ ;; though, and I haven't figured out what does work ;; right. For now we just punt. (values)) - #+nil - ((sb-int:info :function :accessor-for ext-sym) - (values)) ((typep fun 'generic-function) (sb-pcl::generic-function-pretty-arglist fun)) (t @@ -67,3 +68,12 @@ ;;; FIXME: It would probably be good to require here that every ;;; external symbol either has a doc string or has some good excuse ;;; (like being an accessor for a structure which has a doc string). + +;;;; tests of interface machinery + +;;; APROPOS should accept a package designator, not just a package, and +;;; furthermore do the right thing when it gets a package designator. +;;; (bug reported and fixed by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2001-10-17) +(assert (< 0 + (length (apropos-list "PRINT" :cl)) + (length (apropos-list "PRINT"))))