X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Finterface.pure.lisp;h=a37c1f66986ecb56dc8c71e1f4547bd1e236c3ef;hb=df679ed627975948b1cee190f4d79c397588c43e;hp=0db8c7226db9190f3a3b37f2675bfb02ce5ff7f4;hpb=dfa55a883f94470267b626dae77ce7e7dfac3df6;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/tests/interface.pure.lisp b/tests/interface.pure.lisp
index 0db8c72..a37c1f6 100644
--- a/tests/interface.pure.lisp
+++ b/tests/interface.pure.lisp
@@ -1,3 +1,5 @@
+;;;; tests for problems in the interface presented to the user/programmer
+
 ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
 ;;;; more information.
 ;;;;
@@ -10,25 +12,38 @@
 ;;;; more information.
 
 (in-package :cl-user)
+
+;;;; properties of symbols, e.g. presence of doc strings for public symbols
+
+;;; FIXME: It would probably be good to require here that every
+;;; external symbol either has a doc string or has some good excuse
+;;; (like being an accessor for a structure which has a doc string).
+
+;;;; tests of interface machinery
+
+;;; APROPOS should accept a package designator, not just a package, and
+;;; furthermore do the right thing when it gets a package designator.
+;;; (bug reported and fixed by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2001-10-17)
+(assert (< 0
+	   (length (apropos-list "PRINT" :cl))
+	   (length (apropos-list "PRINT"))))
+
+;;; DESCRIBE shouldn't fail on rank-0 arrays (bug reported and fixed
+;;; by Lutz Euler sbcl-devel 2002-12-03)
+(describe #0a0)
+(describe #(1 2 3))
+(describe #2a((1 2) (3 4)))
+
+;;; TYPEP, SUBTYPEP, UPGRADED-ARRAY-ELEMENT-TYPE and
+;;; UPGRADED-COMPLEX-PART-TYPE should be able to deal with NIL as an
+;;; environment argument
+(typep 1 'fixnum nil)
+(subtypep 'fixnum 'integer nil)
+(upgraded-array-element-type '(mod 5) nil)
+(upgraded-complex-part-type '(single-float 0.0 1.0) nil)
+
+;;; We should have documentation for our extension package:
+(assert (documentation (find-package "SB-EXT") t))
 
-;;; Check for fbound external symbols in public packages that have no
-;;; argument list information. (This can happen if we get carried away
-;;; with byte compilation, since at least in sbcl-0.6.12 the byte
-;;; compiler can't record argument list information.)
-(defvar *public-package-names*
-  '("SB-ALIEN" "SB-C-CALL" "SB-DEBUG" "SB-EXT" "SB-EXT""SB-GRAY" "SB-MP"
-    "SB-PROFILE" "SB-PCL" "COMMON-LISP"))
-(defun has-arglist-info-p (function)
-  (and (not (typep function 'sb-c::byte-function))
-       (sb-kernel:%function-arglist function)))
-(defun check-ext-symbols-arglist (package)
-  (format t "~% looking at package: ~A" package)
-  (do-external-symbols (ext-sym package)
-    (when (fboundp ext-sym)
-      (let ((fun (symbol-function ext-sym)))
-        (unless (has-arglist-info-p fun)
-          (error "~%Function ~A (~A) has no argument-list information available, ~%~
-                 and is probably byte-compiled.~%" ext-sym fun))))))
-(dolist (public-package *public-package-names*)
-  (when (find-package public-package)
-    (check-ext-symbols-arglist public-package)))
+;;; DECLARE should not be a special operator
+(assert (not (special-operator-p 'declare)))