X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fmop.impure.lisp;h=22cbcb17693a202431344a055884e7a1ad442179;hb=0520c59af85dca3ddf8c06303b44a0943c83b451;hp=5b65f1ce3cf3dc57567afd6b5a350a0a64dc5f20;hpb=63b936310ea60482b6903126d20a9b68f560de4c;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/mop.impure.lisp b/tests/mop.impure.lisp index 5b65f1c..22cbcb1 100644 --- a/tests/mop.impure.lisp +++ b/tests/mop.impure.lisp @@ -11,40 +11,47 @@ ;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for ;;;; more information. -;;;; Note that the MOP is not in a supported state. Package issues -;;;; (both MOP/SB-PCL and CL/SB-PCL) have yet to be resolved, and -;;;; there is likely to be missing functionality. However, this seems -;;;; a good a way as any of ensuring that we have no regressions. +;;;; Note that the MOP is not in an entirely supported state. +;;;; However, this seems a good a way as any of ensuring that we have +;;;; no regressions. (defpackage "MOP-TEST" - ;; eventually, we might want "MOP" as well here. - (:use "CL")) + (:use "CL" "SB-MOP")) (in-package "MOP-TEST") +;;; Readers for Class Metaobjects (pp. 212--214 of AMOP) +(defclass red-herring (forward-ref) ()) + +(assert (null (class-direct-slots (find-class 'forward-ref)))) +(assert (null (class-direct-default-initargs + (find-class 'forward-ref)))) + ;;; Readers for Generic Function Metaobjects (pp. 216--218 of AMOP) (defgeneric fn-with-odd-arg-precedence (a b c) (:argument-precedence-order b c a)) (assert (equal - (sb-pcl:generic-function-lambda-list #'fn-with-odd-arg-precedence) + (generic-function-lambda-list #'fn-with-odd-arg-precedence) '(a b c))) (assert (equal - (sb-pcl:generic-function-argument-precedence-order #'fn-with-odd-arg-precedence) + (generic-function-argument-precedence-order #'fn-with-odd-arg-precedence) '(b c a))) - -#|| -This is actually a test of vanilla CLOS, not the MOP; however, there isn't -a terribly easy way of testing this without it (FIXME: one would have to -construct a series of DOCUMENTATION methods, probably involving -CALL-NEXT-METHOD). However, since we're actually getting this wrong -currently, better put in a quick test in the hope that we can fix it soon: - +;;; Test for DOCUMENTATION's order, which was wrong until sbcl-0.7.8.39 (assert (equal - (sb-pcl:generic-function-argument-precedence-order #'documentation) - (let ((ll (sb-pcl:generic-function-lambda-list #'documentation))) - (list (nth ll 1) (nth ll 0))))) -||# + (generic-function-argument-precedence-order #'documentation) + (let ((ll (generic-function-lambda-list #'documentation))) + (list (nth 1 ll) (nth 0 ll))))) + +(assert (null + (generic-function-declarations #'fn-with-odd-arg-precedence))) +(defgeneric gf-with-declarations (x) + (declare (optimize (speed 3))) + (declare (optimize (safety 0)))) +(let ((decls (generic-function-declarations #'gf-with-declarations))) + (assert (= (length decls) 2)) + (assert (member '(optimize (speed 3)) decls :test #'equal)) + (assert (member '(optimize (safety 0)) decls :test #'equal))) ;;; Readers for Slot Definition Metaobjects (pp. 221--224 of AMOP) @@ -55,16 +62,16 @@ currently, better put in a quick test in the hope that we can fix it soon: (a-class-slot :allocation :class :accessor a-class-slot))) (dolist (m (list (list #'an-instance-slot :instance) (list #'a-class-slot :class))) - (let ((methods (sb-pcl:generic-function-methods (car m)))) + (let ((methods (generic-function-methods (car m)))) (assert (= (length methods) 1)) - (assert (eq (sb-pcl:slot-definition-allocation - (sb-pcl:accessor-method-slot-definition + (assert (eq (slot-definition-allocation + (accessor-method-slot-definition (car methods))) (cadr m))))) ;;; Class Finalization Protocol (see section 5.5.2 of AMOP) (let ((finalized-count 0)) - (defmethod sb-pcl:finalize-inheritance :after ((x sb-pcl::standard-class)) + (defmethod finalize-inheritance :after ((x standard-class)) (incf finalized-count)) (defun get-count () finalized-count)) (defclass finalization-test-1 () ()) @@ -78,5 +85,44 @@ currently, better put in a quick test in the hope that we can fix it soon: (make-instance 'finalization-test-2) (assert (= (get-count) 3)) +;;; Bits of FUNCALLABLE-STANDARD-CLASS are easy to break; make sure +;;; that it is at least possible to define classes with that as a +;;; metaclass. +(defclass gf-class (standard-generic-function) () + (:metaclass sb-pcl::funcallable-standard-class)) +(defgeneric g (a b c) + (:generic-function-class gf-class)) + +;;; until sbcl-0.7.12.47, PCL wasn't aware of some direct class +;;; relationships. These aren't necessarily true, but are probably +;;; not going to change often. +(dolist (x '(number array sequence character symbol)) + (assert (eq (car (class-direct-superclasses (find-class x))) + (find-class t))) + (assert (member (find-class x) + (class-direct-subclasses (find-class t))))) + +;;; the class-prototype of the NULL class used to be some weird +;;; standard-instance-like thing. Make sure it's actually NIL. +;;; +;;; (and FIXME: eventually turn this into asserting that the prototype +;;; of all built-in-classes is of the relevant type) +(assert (null (class-prototype (find-class 'null)))) + +;;; simple consistency checks for the SB-PCL (perhaps AKA SB-MOP) +;;; package: all of the functionality specified in AMOP is in +;;; functions: +(assert (null (loop for x being each external-symbol in "SB-PCL" + unless (fboundp x) collect x))) +;;; and all generic functions in SB-PCL have at least one specified +;;; method, except for UPDATE-DEPENDENT +(assert (null (loop for x being each external-symbol in "SB-PCL" + unless (or (eq x 'update-dependent) + (not (typep (fdefinition x) 'generic-function)) + (> (length (generic-function-methods + (fdefinition x))) + 0)) + collect x))) + ;;;; success (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)