X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fmop.impure.lisp;h=ddc2e9b05afe40ddb3cd7500cfd0d1eac8e95ab1;hb=f4e8bca5eaa6e6db42299fe2f3852fb2e07508c7;hp=f14f7f1c00010b7a2d5836a870c6c52b7b43ddab;hpb=76874d05d623e0001cfcf23d2c74f78295ba6cee;p=sbcl.git diff --git a/tests/mop.impure.lisp b/tests/mop.impure.lisp index f14f7f1..ddc2e9b 100644 --- a/tests/mop.impure.lisp +++ b/tests/mop.impure.lisp @@ -182,5 +182,193 @@ (assert (not (typep 1 spec))) (assert (typep 4.0 spec))) +;;; BUG #334, relating to programmatic addition of slots to a class +;;; with COMPUTE-SLOTS. +;;; +;;; FIXME: the DUMMY classes here are to prevent class finalization +;;; before the compute-slots method is around. This should probably +;;; be done by defining the COMPUTE-SLOTS methods on a metaclass, +;;; which can be defined before. +;;; +;;; a. adding an :allocation :instance slot +(defclass class-to-add-instance-slot (dummy-ctais) ()) +(defmethod compute-slots ((c (eql (find-class 'class-to-add-instance-slot)))) + (append (call-next-method) + (list (make-instance 'standard-effective-slot-definition + :name 'y + :allocation :instance)))) +(defclass dummy-ctais () ((x :allocation :class))) +(assert (equal (mapcar #'slot-definition-allocation + (class-slots (find-class 'class-to-add-instance-slot))) + ;; FIXME: is the order really guaranteed? + '(:class :instance))) +(assert (typep (slot-definition-location + (cadr (class-slots (find-class 'class-to-add-instance-slot)))) + 'unsigned-byte)) +#| (assert (typep (slot-definition-location (car ...)) '???)) |# +(let ((x (make-instance 'class-to-add-instance-slot))) + (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'x))) + (setf (slot-value x 'x) t) + (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'y))) + (setf (slot-value x 'y) 1) + (assert (= 1 (slot-value x 'y)))) +(let ((x (make-instance 'class-to-add-instance-slot))) + (assert (slot-boundp x 'x)) + (assert (eq t (slot-value x 'x))) + (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'y)))) + +;;; b. adding an :allocation :class slot +(defclass class-to-add-class-slot (dummy-ctacs) ()) +(defmethod compute-slots ((c (eql (find-class 'class-to-add-class-slot)))) + (append (call-next-method) + (list (make-instance 'standard-effective-slot-definition + :name 'y + :allocation :class)))) +(defclass dummy-ctacs () ((x :allocation :class))) +(assert (equal (mapcar #'slot-definition-allocation + (class-slots (find-class 'class-to-add-class-slot))) + '(:class :class))) +(let ((x (make-instance 'class-to-add-class-slot))) + (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'x))) + (setf (slot-value x 'x) nil) + (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'y))) + (setf (slot-value x 'y) 1) + (assert (= 1 (slot-value x 'y)))) +(let ((x (make-instance 'class-to-add-class-slot))) + (assert (slot-boundp x 'x)) + (assert (eq nil (slot-value x 'x))) + (assert (slot-boundp x 'y)) + (assert (= 1 (slot-value x 'y)))) +;;; extra paranoia: check that we haven't broken the instance-slot class +(let ((x (make-instance 'class-to-add-instance-slot))) + (assert (slot-boundp x 'x)) + (assert (eq t (slot-value x 'x))) + (assert (not (slot-boundp x 'y)))) + +;;;; the CTOR optimization was insufficiently careful about its +;;;; assumptions: firstly, it failed with a failed AVER for +;;;; non-standard-allocation slots: +(defclass class-with-frob-slot () + ((frob-slot :initarg :frob-slot :allocation :frob))) +(handler-case + (funcall (compile nil '(lambda () + (make-instance 'class-with-frob-slot + :frob-slot 1)))) + (sb-int:bug (c) (error c)) + (error () "Probably OK: haven't implemented SLOT-BOUNDP-USING-CLASS")) +;;; secondly, it failed to take account of the fact that we might wish +;;; to customize (setf slot-value-using-class) +(defclass class-with-special-ssvuc () + ((some-slot :initarg :some-slot))) +(defvar *special-ssvuc-counter* 0) +(defmethod (setf slot-value-using-class) :before + (new-value class (instance class-with-special-ssvuc) slotd) + (incf *special-ssvuc-counter*)) +(let ((fun (compile nil '(lambda () (make-instance 'class-with-special-ssvuc + :some-slot 1))))) + (assert (= *special-ssvuc-counter* 0)) + (funcall fun) + (assert (= *special-ssvuc-counter* 1)) + (funcall fun) + (assert (= *special-ssvuc-counter* 2))) +;;; and now with the customization after running the function once +(defclass class-with-special-ssvuc-2 () + ((some-slot :initarg :some-slot))) +(defvar *special-ssvuc-counter-2* 0) +(let ((fun (compile nil '(lambda () (make-instance 'class-with-special-ssvuc-2 + :some-slot 1))))) + (assert (= *special-ssvuc-counter-2* 0)) + (funcall fun) + (assert (= *special-ssvuc-counter-2* 0)) + (defmethod (setf slot-value-using-class) :before + (new-value class (instance class-with-special-ssvuc-2) slotd) + (incf *special-ssvuc-counter-2*)) + (funcall fun) + (assert (= *special-ssvuc-counter-2* 1))) + +;;; vicious metacycle detection and resolution wasn't good enough: it +;;; didn't take account that the slots (and hence the slot readers) +;;; might be inherited from superclasses. This example, due to Bruno +;;; Haible, also tests programmatic addition of accessors. +(defclass auto-accessors-direct-slot-definition-class (standard-class) + ((containing-class-name :initarg :containing-class-name))) +(defmethod validate-superclass + ((c1 auto-accessors-direct-slot-definition-class) (c2 standard-class)) + t) +(defclass auto-accessors-class (standard-class) + ()) +(defmethod direct-slot-definition-class ((class auto-accessors-class) + &rest initargs) + (let ((dsd-class-name (gensym))) + (sb-pcl:ensure-class + dsd-class-name + :metaclass 'auto-accessors-direct-slot-definition-class + :direct-superclasses (list (find-class 'standard-direct-slot-definition)) + :containing-class-name (class-name class)) + (eval `(defmethod initialize-instance :after ((dsd ,dsd-class-name) + &rest args) + (when (and (null (slot-definition-readers dsd)) + (null (slot-definition-writers dsd))) + (let* ((containing-class-name + (slot-value (class-of dsd) 'containing-class-name)) + (accessor-name + (intern + (concatenate 'string + (symbol-name containing-class-name) + "-" + (symbol-name (slot-definition-name dsd))) + (symbol-package containing-class-name)))) + (setf (slot-definition-readers dsd) (list accessor-name)) + (setf (slot-definition-writers dsd) + (list (list 'setf accessor-name))))))) + (find-class dsd-class-name))) +(defmethod validate-superclass ((c1 auto-accessors-class) (c2 standard-class)) + t) +(defclass testclass15 () + ((x :initarg :x) (y)) + (:metaclass auto-accessors-class)) +(let ((inst (make-instance 'testclass15 :x 12))) + (assert (equal (list (testclass15-x inst) (setf (testclass15-y inst) 13)) + '(12 13)))) + +;;; bug reported by Bruno Haible on sbcl-devel 2004-11-17: incorrect +;;; handling of multiple values for non-standard slot-options +(progn + (defclass option-slot-definition (sb-mop:standard-direct-slot-definition) + ((option :accessor sl-option :initarg :my-option))) + (defclass option-slot-class (standard-class) + ()) + (defmethod sb-mop:direct-slot-definition-class + ((c option-slot-class) &rest args) + (declare (ignore args)) + (find-class 'option-slot-definition)) + (defmethod sb-mop:validate-superclass + ((c1 option-slot-class) (c2 standard-class)) + t) + (eval '(defclass test-multiple-slot-option-bug () + ((x :my-option bar :my-option baz)) + (:metaclass option-slot-class))) + (assert (null (set-difference + '(bar baz) + (sl-option (first (sb-mop:class-direct-slots + (find-class 'test-multiple-slot-option-bug)))))))) + +;;; bug reported by Bruno Haibel on sbcl-devel 2004-11-19: AMOP requires +;;; that CLASS-PROTOYPE signals an error if the class is not yet finalized +(defclass prototype-not-finalized-sub (prototype-not-finalized-super) ()) +(multiple-value-bind (val err) + (ignore-errors (sb-mop:class-prototype (find-class 'prototype-not-finalized-super))) + (assert (null val)) + (assert (typep err 'error))) + +;;; AMOP says so +(find-method (fdefinition 'sb-mop:allocate-instance) () '(built-in-class)) +(dolist (class-name '(fixnum bignum symbol)) + (let ((class (find-class class-name))) + (multiple-value-bind (value error) (ignore-errors (allocate-instance class)) + (assert (null value)) + (assert (typep error 'error))))) + + ;;;; success (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104)