X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fthreads.impure.lisp;h=141cec05f9de3a0c941c97971cd848733391cdff;hb=a682600e6469735185553ac21c25c50686c54abb;hp=75bb628c7b3b57037d98611943cd7371c812f3a5;hpb=68f7dfa0a165c12200cba27368eb1b12db44be10;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/tests/threads.impure.lisp b/tests/threads.impure.lisp
index 75bb628..141cec0 100644
--- a/tests/threads.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/threads.impure.lisp
@@ -1042,8 +1042,7 @@
 ;;; Make sure that a deadline handler is not invoked twice in a row in
 ;;; CONDITION-WAIT. See LP #512914 for a detailed explanation.
 ;;;
-(with-test (:name (:condition-wait :deadlines :LP-512914)
-            :skipped-on '(not :sb-futex))
+(with-test (:name (:condition-wait :deadlines :LP-512914))
   (let ((n 2)                      ; was empirically enough to trigger the bug
         (mutex (sb-thread:make-mutex))
         (waitq (sb-thread:make-waitqueue))
@@ -1174,7 +1173,7 @@
 
 (format t "infodb test done~%")
 
-(with-test (:name :backtrace)
+(with-test (:name :backtrace :broken-on :darwin)
   ;; Printing backtraces from several threads at once used to hang the
   ;; whole SBCL process (discovered by accident due to a timer.impure
   ;; test misbehaving). The cause was that packages weren't even