X-Git-Url: http://repo.macrolet.net/gitweb/?a=blobdiff_plain;f=tests%2Fthreads.impure.lisp;h=60973e0bfd16412303788788e488bafb02ebfbff;hb=35bfc07cbd9aa8029e9cc42f1a3fab27f1a673f4;hp=bc56053bdbae5e501123d4e115eb92e61431b6e3;hpb=d4d6c4b16a3655ce99a87d43f411391363531260;p=sbcl.git

diff --git a/tests/threads.impure.lisp b/tests/threads.impure.lisp
index bc56053..60973e0 100644
--- a/tests/threads.impure.lisp
+++ b/tests/threads.impure.lisp
@@ -81,8 +81,10 @@
 (with-open-file (o "threads-foreign.c" :direction :output :if-exists :supersede)
   (format o "void loop_forever() { while(1) ; }~%"))
 (sb-ext:run-program
- "cc"
- (or #+linux '("-shared" "-o" "threads-foreign.so" "threads-foreign.c")
+ #-sunos "cc" #+sunos "gcc"
+ (or #+(or linux freebsd sunos) '(#+x86-64 "-fPIC"
+                                  "-shared" "-o" "threads-foreign.so" "threads-foreign.c")
+     #+darwin '("-dynamiclib" "-o" "threads-foreign.so" "threads-foreign.c")
      (error "Missing shared library compilation options for this platform"))
  :search t)
 (sb-alien:load-shared-object "threads-foreign.so")
@@ -114,11 +116,10 @@
     (with-mutex (l)
       (with-recursive-lock (l)))))
 
-(let ((l (make-spinlock :name "spinlock"))
-      (p *current-thread*))
+(let ((l (make-spinlock :name "spinlock")))
   (assert (eql (spinlock-value l) 0) nil "1")
   (with-spinlock (l)
-    (assert (eql (spinlock-value l) p) nil "2"))
+    (assert (eql (spinlock-value l) 1) nil "2"))
   (assert (eql (spinlock-value l) 0) nil "3"))
 
 ;; test that SLEEP actually sleeps for at least the given time, even
@@ -317,7 +318,8 @@
                       (lambda ()
                         (princ ".") (force-output)
                         (assert (thread-alive-p *current-thread*))
-                        (assert (zerop SB-KERNEL:*PSEUDO-ATOMIC-ATOMIC*)))))
+                        (assert
+                         (not (logbitp 0 SB-KERNEL:*PSEUDO-ATOMIC-BITS*))))))
   (terminate-thread c)
   (wait-for-threads (list c)))
 
@@ -476,6 +478,90 @@
  (lambda ()
    (sb-ext:run-program "sleep" '("1") :search t :wait nil)))
 
+;;;; Binding stack safety
+
+(defparameter *x* nil)
+(defparameter *n-gcs-requested* 0)
+(defparameter *n-gcs-done* 0)
+
+(let ((counter 0))
+  (defun make-something-big ()
+    (let ((x (make-string 32000)))
+      (incf counter)
+      (let ((counter counter))
+        (sb-ext:finalize x (lambda () (format t " ~S" counter)
+                                   (force-output)))))))
+
+(defmacro wait-for-gc ()
+  `(progn
+     (incf *n-gcs-requested*)
+     (loop while (< *n-gcs-done* *n-gcs-requested*))))
+
+(defun send-gc ()
+  (loop until (< *n-gcs-done* *n-gcs-requested*))
+  (format t "G")
+  (force-output)
+  (sb-ext:gc)
+  (incf *n-gcs-done*))
+
+(defun exercise-binding ()
+  (loop
+   (let ((*x* (make-something-big)))
+     (let ((*x* 42))
+       ;; at this point the binding stack looks like this:
+       ;; NO-TLS-VALUE-MARKER, *x*, SOMETHING, *x*
+       t))
+   (wait-for-gc)
+   ;; sig_stop_for_gc_handler binds FREE_INTERRUPT_CONTEXT_INDEX. By
+   ;; now SOMETHING is gc'ed and the binding stack looks like this: 0,
+   ;; 0, SOMETHING, 0 (because the symbol slots are zeroed on
+   ;; unbinding but values are not).
+   (let ((*x* nil))
+     ;; bump bsp as if a BIND had just started
+     (incf sb-vm::*binding-stack-pointer* 2)
+     (wait-for-gc)
+     (decf sb-vm::*binding-stack-pointer* 2))))
+
+(with-test (:name (:binding-stack-gc-safety))
+  (let (threads)
+    (unwind-protect
+         (progn
+           (push (sb-thread:make-thread #'exercise-binding) threads)
+           (push (sb-thread:make-thread (lambda ()
+                                          (loop
+                                           (sleep 0.1)
+                                           (send-gc))))
+                 threads)
+           (sleep 4))
+      (mapc #'sb-thread:terminate-thread threads))))
+
+(format t "~&binding test done~%")
+
+;; Try to corrupt the NEXT-VECTOR. Operations on a hash table with a
+;; cyclic NEXT-VECTOR can loop endlessly in a WITHOUT-GCING form
+;; causing the next gc hang SBCL.
+(with-test (:name (:hash-table-thread-safety))
+  (let* ((hash (make-hash-table))
+         (threads (list (sb-thread:make-thread
+                         (lambda ()
+                           (loop
+                            ;;(princ "1") (force-output)
+                            (setf (gethash (random 100) hash) 'h))))
+                        (sb-thread:make-thread
+                         (lambda ()
+                           (loop
+                            ;;(princ "2") (force-output)
+                            (remhash (random 100) hash))))
+                        (sb-thread:make-thread
+                         (lambda ()
+                           (loop
+                            (sleep (random 1.0))
+                            (sb-ext:gc :full t)))))))
+    (unwind-protect
+         (sleep 5)
+      (mapc #'sb-thread:terminate-thread threads))))
+
+(format t "~&hash table test done~%")
 #|  ;; a cll post from eric marsden
 | (defun crash ()
 |   (setq *debugger-hook*
@@ -488,3 +574,213 @@
 |     (mp:make-process #'roomy)
 |     (mp:make-process #'roomy)))
 |#
+
+(with-test (:name (:condition-variable :notify-multiple))
+  (flet ((tester (notify-fun)
+           (let ((queue (make-waitqueue :name "queue"))
+                 (lock (make-mutex :name "lock"))
+                 (data nil))
+             (labels ((test (x)
+                        (loop
+                           (with-mutex (lock)
+                             (format t "condition-wait ~a~%" x)
+                             (force-output)
+                             (condition-wait queue lock)
+                             (format t "woke up ~a~%" x)
+                             (force-output)
+                             (push x data)))))
+               (let ((threads (loop for x from 1 to 10
+                                    collect
+                                    (let ((x x))
+                                      (sb-thread:make-thread (lambda ()
+                                                               (test x)))))))
+                 (sleep 5)
+                 (with-mutex (lock)
+                   (funcall notify-fun queue))
+                 (sleep 5)
+                 (mapcar #'terminate-thread threads)
+                 ;; Check that all threads woke up at least once
+                 (assert (= (length (remove-duplicates data)) 10)))))))
+    (tester (lambda (queue)
+              (format t "~&(condition-notify queue 10)~%")
+              (force-output)
+              (condition-notify queue 10)))
+    (tester (lambda (queue)
+              (format t "~&(condition-broadcast queue)~%")
+              (force-output)
+              (condition-broadcast queue)))))
+
+(format t "waitqueue wakeup tests done~%")
+
+(with-test (:name (:mutex :finalization))
+  (let ((a nil))
+    (dotimes (i 500000)
+      (setf a (make-mutex)))))
+
+(format t "mutex finalization test done~%")
+
+;;; Check that INFO is thread-safe, at least when we're just doing reads.
+
+(let* ((symbols (loop repeat 10000 collect (gensym)))
+       (functions (loop for (symbol . rest) on symbols
+                        for next = (car rest)
+                        for fun = (let ((next next))
+                                    (lambda (n)
+                                      (if next
+                                          (funcall next (1- n))
+                                          n)))
+                        do (setf (symbol-function symbol) fun)
+                        collect fun)))
+  (defun infodb-test ()
+    (funcall (car functions) 9999)))
+
+(with-test (:name (:infodb :read))
+  (let* ((ok t)
+         (threads (loop for i from 0 to 10
+                        collect (sb-thread:make-thread
+                                 (let ((i i))
+                                   (lambda ()
+                                     (dotimes (j 100)
+                                       (write-char #\-)
+                                       (finish-output)
+                                       (let ((n (infodb-test)))
+                                         (unless (zerop n)
+                                           (setf ok nil)
+                                           (format t "N != 0 (~A)~%" n)
+                                           (quit))))))))))
+    (wait-for-threads threads)
+    (assert ok)))
+
+(format t "infodb test done~%")
+
+(with-test (:name (:backtrace))
+  ;; Printing backtraces from several threads at once used to hang the
+  ;; whole SBCL process (discovered by accident due to a timer.impure
+  ;; test misbehaving). The cause was that packages weren't even
+  ;; thread-safe for only doing FIND-SYMBOL, and while printing
+  ;; backtraces a loot of symbol lookups need to be done due to
+  ;; *PRINT-ESCAPE*.
+  (let* ((threads (loop repeat 10
+                        collect (sb-thread:make-thread
+                                 (lambda ()
+                                   (dotimes (i 1000)
+                                     (with-output-to-string (*debug-io*)
+                                       (sb-debug::backtrace 10))))))))
+    (wait-for-threads threads)))
+
+(format t "backtrace test done~%")
+
+(format t "~&starting gc deadlock test: WARNING: THIS TEST WILL HANG ON FAILURE!~%")
+
+(with-test (:name (:gc-deadlock))
+  ;; Prior to 0.9.16.46 thread exit potentially deadlocked the
+  ;; GC due to *all-threads-lock* and session lock. On earlier
+  ;; versions and at least on one specific box this test is good enough
+  ;; to catch that typically well before the 1500th iteration.
+  (loop
+     with i = 0
+     with n = 3000
+     while (< i n)
+     do
+       (incf i)
+       (when (zerop (mod i 100))
+         (write-char #\.)
+         (force-output))
+       (handler-case
+           (if (oddp i)
+               (sb-thread:make-thread
+                (lambda ()
+                  (sleep (random 0.001)))
+                :name (list :sleep i))
+               (sb-thread:make-thread
+                (lambda ()
+                  ;; KLUDGE: what we are doing here is explicit,
+                  ;; but the same can happen because of a regular
+                  ;; MAKE-THREAD or LIST-ALL-THREADS, and various
+                  ;; session functions.
+                  (sb-thread:with-mutex (sb-thread::*all-threads-lock*)
+                    (sb-thread::with-session-lock (sb-thread::*session*)
+                      (sb-ext:gc))))
+                :name (list :gc i)))
+         (error (e)
+           (format t "~%error creating thread ~D: ~A -- backing off for retry~%" i e)
+           (sleep 0.1)
+           (incf i)))))
+
+(format t "~&gc deadlock test done~%")
+
+(let ((count (make-array 8 :initial-element 0)))
+  (defun closure-one ()
+    (declare (optimize safety))
+    (values (incf (aref count 0)) (incf (aref count 1))
+            (incf (aref count 2)) (incf (aref count 3))
+            (incf (aref count 4)) (incf (aref count 5))
+            (incf (aref count 6)) (incf (aref count 7))))
+  (defun no-optimizing-away-closure-one ()
+    (setf count (make-array 8 :initial-element 0))))
+
+(defstruct box
+  (count 0))
+
+(let ((one (make-box))
+      (two (make-box))
+      (three (make-box)))
+  (defun closure-two ()
+    (declare (optimize safety))
+    (values (incf (box-count one)) (incf (box-count two)) (incf (box-count three))))
+  (defun no-optimizing-away-closure-two ()
+    (setf one (make-box)
+          two (make-box)
+          three (make-box))))
+
+(with-test (:name (:funcallable-instances))
+  ;; the funcallable-instance implementation used not to be threadsafe
+  ;; against setting the funcallable-instance function to a closure
+  ;; (because the code and lexenv were set separately).
+  (let ((fun (sb-kernel:%make-funcallable-instance 0))
+        (condition nil))
+    (setf (sb-kernel:funcallable-instance-fun fun) #'closure-one)
+    (flet ((changer ()
+             (loop (setf (sb-kernel:funcallable-instance-fun fun) #'closure-one)
+                   (setf (sb-kernel:funcallable-instance-fun fun) #'closure-two)))
+           (test ()
+             (handler-case (loop (funcall fun))
+               (serious-condition (c) (setf condition c)))))
+      (let ((changer (make-thread #'changer))
+            (test (make-thread #'test)))
+        (handler-case
+            (progn
+              ;; The two closures above are fairly carefully crafted
+              ;; so that if given the wrong lexenv they will tend to
+              ;; do some serious damage, but it is of course difficult
+              ;; to predict where the various bits and pieces will be
+              ;; allocated.  Five seconds failed fairly reliably on
+              ;; both my x86 and x86-64 systems.  -- CSR, 2006-09-27.
+              (sb-ext:with-timeout 5
+                (wait-for-threads (list test)))
+              (error "~@<test thread got condition:~2I~_~A~@:>" condition))
+          (sb-ext:timeout ()
+            (terminate-thread changer)
+            (terminate-thread test)
+            (wait-for-threads (list changer test))))))))
+
+(format t "~&funcallable-instance test done~%")
+
+(defun random-type (n)
+  `(integer ,(random n) ,(+ n (random n))))
+
+(defun subtypep-hash-cache-test ()
+  (dotimes (i 10000)
+    (let ((type1 (random-type 500))
+          (type2 (random-type 500)))
+      (let ((a (subtypep type1 type2)))
+        (dotimes (i 100)
+          (assert (eq (subtypep type1 type2) a))))))
+  (format t "ok~%")
+  (force-output))
+
+(with-test (:name '(:hash-cache :subtypep))
+  (dotimes (i 10)
+    (sb-thread:make-thread #'subtypep-hash-cache-test)))
+
+(format t "hash-cache tests done~%")