From 7925b4a354eac19ceaac85b492550f187cad97d1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: William Harold Newman Date: Fri, 10 May 2002 14:23:28 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] 0.7.3.14: updated BUGS --- BUGS | 13 +++++++++++++ version.lisp-expr | 2 +- 2 files changed, 14 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS index 8399c2b..c2264a2 100644 --- a/BUGS +++ b/BUGS @@ -1271,6 +1271,19 @@ WORKAROUND: macro is unhappy with the illegal syntax in the method body, and is giving an unclear error message. +168: + (reported by Dan Barlow on sbcl-devel 2002-05-10) + In sbcl-0.7.3.12, doing + (defstruct foo bar baz) + (compile nil (lambda (x) (or x (foo-baz x)))) + gives an error + debugger invoked on condition of type SB-INT:BUG: + full call to SB-KERNEL:%INSTANCE-REF + This is probably a bug in SBCL itself. [...] + Since this is a reasonable user error, it shouldn't be reported as + an SBCL bug. + + DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS IR1-#: These labels were used for bugs related to the old IR1 interpreter. diff --git a/version.lisp-expr b/version.lisp-expr index cf8daf5..bed6b21 100644 --- a/version.lisp-expr +++ b/version.lisp-expr @@ -18,4 +18,4 @@ ;;; for internal versions, especially for internal versions off the ;;; main CVS branch, it gets hairier, e.g. "0.pre7.14.flaky4.13".) -"0.7.3.13" +"0.7.3.14" -- 1.7.10.4