1 ;;;; the representation of a lexical environment
3 ;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
6 ;;;; This software is derived from the CMU CL system, which was
7 ;;;; written at Carnegie Mellon University and released into the
8 ;;;; public domain. The software is in the public domain and is
9 ;;;; provided with absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS
10 ;;;; files for more information.
14 #!-sb-fluid (declaim (inline internal-make-lexenv)) ; only called in one place
16 ;;; The LEXENV represents the lexical environment used for IR1 conversion.
17 ;;; (This is also what shows up as an ENVIRONMENT value in macroexpansion.)
18 #!-sb-fluid (declaim (inline internal-make-lexenv)) ; only called in one place
20 (:constructor make-null-lexenv ())
21 (:constructor make-null-interactive-lexenv
22 (&aux (policy (list '(safety . 3)
23 '(compilation-speed . 2)
27 '(inhibit-warnings . 1)))))
28 (:constructor internal-make-lexenv
29 (funs vars blocks tags
31 weakend-type-restrictions
32 lambda cleanup policy)))
33 ;; an alist of (NAME . WHAT), where WHAT is either a FUNCTIONAL (a
34 ;; local function), a DEFINED-FUN, representing an
35 ;; INLINE/NOTINLINE declaration, or a list (MACRO . <function>) (a
36 ;; local macro, with the specifier expander). Note that NAME may be
37 ;; a (SETF <name>) list, not necessarily a single symbol.
39 ;; an alist translating variable names to LEAF structures. A special
40 ;; binding is indicated by a :SPECIAL GLOBAL-VAR leaf. Each special
41 ;; binding within the code gets a distinct leaf structure, as does
42 ;; the current "global" value on entry to the code compiled.
43 ;; (locally (special ...)) is handled by adding the most recent
44 ;; special binding to the front of the list.
46 ;; If the CDR is (MACRO . <exp>), then <exp> is the expansion of a
49 ;; BLOCKS and TAGS are alists from block and go-tag names to 2-lists
50 ;; of the form (<entry> <continuation>), where <continuation> is the
51 ;; continuation to exit to, and <entry> is the corresponding ENTRY node.
52 (blocks nil :type list)
54 ;; an alist (THING . CTYPE) which is used to keep track of
55 ;; "pervasive" type declarations. When THING is a leaf, this is for
56 ;; type declarations that pertain to the type in a syntactic extent
57 ;; which does not correspond to a binding of the affected name. When
58 ;; THING is a continuation, this is used to track the innermost THE
60 (type-restrictions nil :type list)
61 (weakend-type-restrictions nil :type list)
62 ;; the lexically enclosing lambda, if any
64 ;; FIXME: This should be :TYPE (OR CLAMBDA NULL), but it was too hard
65 ;; to get CLAMBDA defined in time for the cross-compiler.
67 ;; the lexically enclosing cleanup, or NIL if none enclosing within Lambda
69 ;; the current OPTIMIZE policy
70 (policy *policy* :type policy))
72 ;;; support for the idiom (in MACROEXPAND and elsewhere) that NIL is
73 ;;; to be taken as a null lexical environment
74 (defun coerce-to-lexenv (x)
76 (null (make-null-lexenv))
79 (defun maybe-inline-syntactic-closure (lambda lexenv)
80 (declare (type list lambda) (type lexenv lexenv))
81 (aver (eql (first lambda) 'lambda))
82 ;; We used to have a trivial implementation, verifying that lexenv
83 ;; was effectively null. However, this fails to take account of the
86 ;; (declaim (inline foo))
87 ;; (macrolet ((def (x) `(defun ,x () ...)))
90 ;; which, while too complicated for the cross-compiler to handle in
91 ;; unfriendly foreign lisp environments, would be good to support in
92 ;; the target compiler. -- CSR, 2002-05-13 and 2002-11-02
93 (let ((vars (lexenv-vars lexenv))
94 (funs (lexenv-funs lexenv)))
95 (collect ((decls) (macros) (symbol-macros))
97 ((or (lexenv-blocks lexenv) (lexenv-tags lexenv)) nil)
98 ((and (null vars) (null funs)) `(lambda-with-lexenv
101 ((dolist (x vars nil)
103 ;; KLUDGE: too complicated for cross-compilation
108 ;; only worry about the innermost binding
109 (when (eq x (assoc name vars :test #'eq))
112 (aver (eq (car what) 'macro))
115 ;; A global should not appear in the lexical
116 ;; environment? Is this true? FIXME!
117 (aver (eq (global-var-kind what) :special))
118 (decls `(special ,name)))
120 ;; we can't inline in the presence of this object
123 ((dolist (x funs nil)
125 ;; KLUDGE: too complicated for cross-compilation (and
126 ;; failure of OAOO in comments, *sigh*)
131 ;; again, only worry about the innermost binding, but
132 ;; functions can have name (SETF FOO) so we need to use
133 ;; EQUAL for the test.
134 (when (eq x (assoc name funs :test #'equal))
137 (macros (cons name (function-lambda-expression (cdr what)))))
138 ;; FIXME: Is there a good reason for this not to be
139 ;; DEFINED-FUN (which :INCLUDEs GLOBAL-VAR, in case
140 ;; you're wondering how this ever worked :-)? Maybe
141 ;; in conjunction with an AVERrance that it's not an
142 ;; (AND GLOBAL-VAR (NOT GLOBAL-FUN))? -- CSR,
145 (when (defined-fun-p what)
146 (decls `(,(car (rassoc (defined-fun-inlinep what)
147 *inlinep-translations*))
152 ;; if we get this far, we've successfully dealt with
153 ;; everything in FUNS and VARS, so:
154 `(lambda-with-lexenv ,(decls) ,(macros) ,(symbol-macros)