(numerator divisor))))
(values q (- number (* q divisor)))))
((fixnum bignum)
- (values 0 number))
+ (bignum-truncate (make-small-bignum number) divisor))
((ratio (or float rational))
(let ((q (truncate (numerator number)
(* (denominator number) divisor))))
(if (eql divisor 1)
(round number)
(multiple-value-bind (tru rem) (truncate number divisor)
- (let ((thresh (/ (abs divisor) 2)))
- (cond ((or (> rem thresh)
- (and (= rem thresh) (oddp tru)))
- (if (minusp divisor)
- (values (- tru 1) (+ rem divisor))
- (values (+ tru 1) (- rem divisor))))
- ((let ((-thresh (- thresh)))
- (or (< rem -thresh)
- (and (= rem -thresh) (oddp tru))))
- (if (minusp divisor)
- (values (+ tru 1) (- rem divisor))
- (values (- tru 1) (+ rem divisor))))
- (t (values tru rem)))))))
+ (if (zerop rem)
+ (values tru rem)
+ (let ((thresh (/ (abs divisor) 2)))
+ (cond ((or (> rem thresh)
+ (and (= rem thresh) (oddp tru)))
+ (if (minusp divisor)
+ (values (- tru 1) (+ rem divisor))
+ (values (+ tru 1) (- rem divisor))))
+ ((let ((-thresh (- thresh)))
+ (or (< rem -thresh)
+ (and (= rem -thresh) (oddp tru))))
+ (if (minusp divisor)
+ (values (+ tru 1) (- rem divisor))
+ (values (- tru 1) (+ rem divisor))))
+ (t (values tru rem))))))))
(defun rem (number divisor)
#!+sb-doc
(declare (integer result)))
-1))
-(defun lognand (integer1 integer2)
- #!+sb-doc
- "Return the complement of the logical AND of integer1 and integer2."
- (lognand integer1 integer2))
-
-(defun lognor (integer1 integer2)
- #!+sb-doc
- "Return the complement of the logical OR of integer1 and integer2."
- (lognor integer1 integer2))
-
-(defun logandc1 (integer1 integer2)
- #!+sb-doc
- "Return the logical AND of (LOGNOT integer1) and integer2."
- (logandc1 integer1 integer2))
-
-(defun logandc2 (integer1 integer2)
- #!+sb-doc
- "Return the logical AND of integer1 and (LOGNOT integer2)."
- (logandc2 integer1 integer2))
-
-(defun logorc1 (integer1 integer2)
- #!+sb-doc
- "Return the logical OR of (LOGNOT integer1) and integer2."
- (logorc1 integer1 integer2))
-
-(defun logorc2 (integer1 integer2)
- #!+sb-doc
- "Return the logical OR of integer1 and (LOGNOT integer2)."
- (logorc2 integer1 integer2))
-
(defun lognot (number)
#!+sb-doc
"Return the bit-wise logical not of integer."
(fixnum (lognot (truly-the fixnum number)))
(bignum (bignum-logical-not number))))
-(macrolet ((def (name op big-op)
- `(defun ,name (x y)
- (number-dispatch ((x integer) (y integer))
- (bignum-cross-fixnum ,op ,big-op)))))
+(macrolet ((def (name op big-op &optional doc)
+ `(defun ,name (integer1 integer2)
+ ,@(when doc
+ (list doc))
+ (let ((x integer1)
+ (y integer2))
+ (number-dispatch ((x integer) (y integer))
+ (bignum-cross-fixnum ,op ,big-op))))))
(def two-arg-and logand bignum-logical-and)
(def two-arg-ior logior bignum-logical-ior)
- (def two-arg-xor logxor bignum-logical-xor))
+ (def two-arg-xor logxor bignum-logical-xor)
+ ;; BIGNUM-LOGICAL-{AND,IOR,XOR} need not return a bignum, so must
+ ;; call the generic LOGNOT...
+ (def two-arg-eqv logeqv (lambda (x y) (lognot (bignum-logical-xor x y))))
+ (def lognand lognand
+ (lambda (x y) (lognot (bignum-logical-and x y)))
+ #!+sb-doc "Complement the logical AND of INTEGER1 and INTEGER2.")
+ (def lognor lognor
+ (lambda (x y) (lognot (bignum-logical-ior x y)))
+ #!+sb-doc "Complement the logical AND of INTEGER1 and INTEGER2.")
+ ;; ... but BIGNUM-LOGICAL-NOT on a bignum will always return a bignum
+ (def logandc1 logandc1
+ (lambda (x y) (bignum-logical-and (bignum-logical-not x) y))
+ #!+sb-doc "Bitwise AND (LOGNOT INTEGER1) with INTEGER2.")
+ (def logandc2 logandc2
+ (lambda (x y) (bignum-logical-and x (bignum-logical-not y)))
+ #!+sb-doc "Bitwise AND INTEGER1 with (LOGNOT INTEGER2).")
+ (def logorc1 logorc1
+ (lambda (x y) (bignum-logical-ior (bignum-logical-not x) y))
+ #!+sb-doc "Bitwise OR (LOGNOT INTEGER1) with INTEGER2.")
+ (def logorc2 logorc2
+ (lambda (x y) (bignum-logical-ior x (bignum-logical-not y)))
+ #!+sb-doc "Bitwise OR INTEGER1 with (LOGNOT INTEGER2)."))
(defun logcount (integer)
#!+sb-doc
if INTEGER is negative."
(etypecase integer
(fixnum
- (logcount (truly-the (integer 0 #.(max most-positive-fixnum
- (lognot most-negative-fixnum)))
+ (logcount (truly-the (integer 0
+ #.(max sb!xc:most-positive-fixnum
+ (lognot sb!xc:most-negative-fixnum)))
(if (minusp (truly-the fixnum integer))
(lognot (truly-the fixnum integer))
integer))))
(defun logbitp (index integer)
#!+sb-doc
"Predicate returns T if bit index of integer is a 1."
- (logbitp index integer))
+ (number-dispatch ((index integer) (integer integer))
+ ((fixnum fixnum) (if (> index #.(- sb!vm:n-word-bits sb!vm:n-lowtag-bits))
+ (minusp integer)
+ (not (zerop (logand integer (ash 1 index))))))
+ ((fixnum bignum) (bignum-logbitp index integer))
+ ((bignum (foreach fixnum bignum)) (minusp integer))))
(defun ash (integer count)
#!+sb-doc
(defun two-arg-lcm (n m)
(declare (integer n m))
- (* (truncate (max n m) (gcd n m)) (min n m)))
+ (if (or (zerop n) (zerop m))
+ 0
+ ;; KLUDGE: I'm going to assume that it was written this way
+ ;; originally for a reason. However, this is a somewhat
+ ;; complicated way of writing the algorithm in the CLHS page for
+ ;; LCM, and I don't know why. To be investigated. -- CSR,
+ ;; 2003-09-11
+ (let ((m (abs m))
+ (n (abs n)))
+ (multiple-value-bind (max min)
+ (if (> m n)
+ (values m n)
+ (values n m))
+ (* (truncate max (gcd n m)) min)))))
;;; Do the GCD of two integer arguments. With fixnum arguments, we use the
;;; binary GCD algorithm from Knuth's seminumerical algorithms (slightly
;;; of 0 before the dispatch so that the bignum code doesn't have to worry
;;; about "small bignum" zeros.
(defun two-arg-gcd (u v)
- (cond ((eql u 0) v)
- ((eql v 0) u)
+ (cond ((eql u 0) (abs v))
+ ((eql v 0) (abs u))
(t
(number-dispatch ((u integer) (v integer))
((fixnum fixnum)
#.
(collect ((forms))
(flet ((definition (name lambda-list width pattern)
- ;; We rely on (SUBTYPEP `(UNSIGNED-BYTE ,WIDTH)
- ;; 'BIGNUM-ELEMENT-TYPE)
`(defun ,name ,lambda-list
(flet ((prepare-argument (x)
(declare (integer x))
(etypecase x
((unsigned-byte ,width) x)
- (bignum-element-type (logand x ,pattern))
(fixnum (logand x ,pattern))
- (bignum (logand (%bignum-ref x 0) ,pattern)))))
+ (bignum (logand x ,pattern)))))
(,name ,@(loop for arg in lambda-list
collect `(prepare-argument ,arg)))))))
(loop for infos being each hash-value of sb!c::*modular-funs*
;; FIXME: We need to process only "toplevel" functions
+ when (listp infos)
do (loop for info in infos
for name = (sb!c::modular-fun-info-name info)
and width = (sb!c::modular-fun-info-width info)
for pattern = (1- (ash 1 width))
do (forms (definition name lambda-list width pattern)))))
`(progn ,@(forms)))
+
+;;; KLUDGE: these out-of-line definitions can't use the modular
+;;; arithmetic, as that is only (currently) defined for constant
+;;; shifts. See also the comment in (LOGAND OPTIMIZER) for more
+;;; discussion of this hack. -- CSR, 2003-10-09
+#!-alpha
+(defun sb!vm::ash-left-mod32 (integer amount)
+ (etypecase integer
+ ((unsigned-byte 32) (ldb (byte 32 0) (ash integer amount)))
+ (fixnum (ldb (byte 32 0) (ash (logand integer #xffffffff) amount)))
+ (bignum (ldb (byte 32 0) (ash (logand integer #xffffffff) amount)))))
+#!+alpha
+(defun sb!vm::ash-left-mod64 (integer amount)
+ (etypecase integer
+ ((unsigned-byte 64) (ldb (byte 64 0) (ash integer amount)))
+ (fixnum (ldb (byte 64 0) (ash (logand integer #xffffffffffffffff) amount)))
+ (bignum (ldb (byte 64 0)
+ (ash (logand integer #xffffffffffffffff) amount)))))