#!+sb-doc
"Spinlock type."
(name nil :type (or null simple-string))
- (value 0))
+ (value nil))
(sb!xc:defmacro with-mutex ((mutex &key (value '*current-thread*) (wait-p t))
&body body)
"Acquire MUTEX for the dynamic scope of BODY, setting it to
NEW-VALUE or some suitable default value if NIL. If WAIT-P is non-NIL
and the mutex is in use, sleep until it is available"
- #!-sb-thread (declare (ignore mutex value wait-p))
- #!+sb-thread
- (with-unique-names (got mutex1)
- `(let ((,mutex1 ,mutex)
- ,got)
- (/show0 "WITH-MUTEX")
- (unwind-protect
- ;; FIXME: async unwind in SETQ form
- (when (setq ,got (get-mutex ,mutex1 ,value ,wait-p))
- (locally
- ,@body))
- (when ,got
- (release-mutex ,mutex1)))))
- ;; KLUDGE: this separate expansion for (NOT SB-THREAD) is not
- ;; strictly necessary; GET-MUTEX and RELEASE-MUTEX are implemented.
- ;; However, there would be a (possibly slight) performance hit in
- ;; using them.
- #!-sb-thread
- `(locally ,@body))
+ `(dx-flet ((with-mutex-thunk () ,@body))
+ (call-with-mutex
+ #'with-mutex-thunk
+ ,mutex
+ ,value
+ ,wait-p)))
+
+(sb!xc:defmacro with-system-mutex ((mutex &key without-gcing) &body body)
+ `(dx-flet ((with-system-mutex-thunk () ,@body))
+ (call-with-system-mutex
+ #'with-system-mutex-thunk
+ ,mutex
+ ,without-gcing)))
(sb!xc:defmacro with-recursive-lock ((mutex) &body body)
#!+sb-doc
further recursive lock attempts for the same mutex succeed. It is
allowed to mix WITH-MUTEX and WITH-RECURSIVE-LOCK for the same mutex
provided the default value is used for the mutex."
- #!-sb-thread
- (declare (ignore mutex))
- #!+sb-thread
- (with-unique-names (mutex1 inner-lock-p)
- `(let* ((,mutex1 ,mutex)
- (,inner-lock-p (eq (mutex-value ,mutex1) *current-thread*)))
- (unwind-protect
- (progn
- (unless ,inner-lock-p
- (get-mutex ,mutex1))
- (locally
- ,@body))
- (unless ,inner-lock-p
- (release-mutex ,mutex1)))))
- #!-sb-thread
- `(locally ,@body))
+ `(dx-flet ((with-recursive-lock-thunk () ,@body))
+ (call-with-recursive-lock
+ #'with-recursive-lock-thunk
+ ,mutex)))
+
+(sb!xc:defmacro with-recursive-spinlock ((spinlock) &body body)
+ `(dx-flet ((with-recursive-spinlock-thunk () ,@body))
+ (call-with-recursive-spinlock
+ #'with-recursive-spinlock-thunk
+ ,spinlock)))
+
+(sb!xc:defmacro with-recursive-system-spinlock ((spinlock &key without-gcing)
+ &body body)
+ `(dx-flet ((with-recursive-system-spinlock-thunk () ,@body))
+ (call-with-recursive-system-spinlock
+ #'with-recursive-system-spinlock-thunk
+ ,spinlock
+ ,without-gcing)))
(sb!xc:defmacro with-spinlock ((spinlock) &body body)
- #!-sb-thread
- (declare (ignore spinlock))
- #!-sb-thread
- `(locally ,@body)
- #!+sb-thread
- (with-unique-names (lock got-it)
- `(let ((,lock ,spinlock)
- (,got-it nil))
- (unwind-protect
- (progn
- (setf ,got-it (get-spinlock ,lock))
- (locally ,@body))
- (when ,got-it
- (release-spinlock ,lock))))))
+ `(dx-flet ((with-spinlock-thunk () ,@body))
+ (call-with-spinlock
+ #'with-spinlock-thunk
+ ,spinlock)))
+
+;;; KLUDGE: this separate implementation for (NOT SB-THREAD) is not
+;;; strictly necessary; GET-MUTEX and RELEASE-MUTEX are implemented.
+;;; However, there would be a (possibly slight) performance hit in
+;;; using them.
+#!-sb-thread
+(progn
+ (defun call-with-system-mutex (function mutex &optional without-gcing-p)
+ (declare (ignore mutex)
+ (function function))
+ (if without-gcing-p
+ (without-gcing
+ (funcall function))
+ (without-interrupts
+ (allow-with-interrupts (funcall function)))))
+
+ (defun call-with-system-spinlock (function spinlock &optional without-gcing-p)
+ (declare (ignore spinlock)
+ (function function))
+ (if without-gcing-p
+ (without-gcing
+ (funcall function))
+ (without-interrupts
+ (allow-with-interrupts (funcall function)))))
+
+ (defun call-with-recursive-system-spinlock (function lock
+ &optional without-gcing-p)
+ (declare (ignore lock)
+ (function function))
+ (if without-gcing-p
+ (without-gcing
+ (funcall function))
+ (without-interrupts
+ (allow-with-interrupts (funcall function)))))
+
+ (defun call-with-mutex (function mutex value waitp)
+ (declare (ignore mutex value waitp)
+ (function function))
+ (funcall function))
+
+ (defun call-with-recursive-lock (function mutex)
+ (declare (ignore mutex) (function function))
+ (funcall function))
+
+ (defun call-with-spinlock (function spinlock)
+ (declare (ignore spinlock) (function function))
+ (funcall function))
+
+ (defun call-with-recursive-spinlock (function spinlock)
+ (declare (ignore spinlock) (function function))
+ (funcall function)))
+
+#!+sb-thread
+;;; KLUDGE: These need to use DX-LET, because the cleanup form that
+;;; closes over GOT-IT causes a value-cell to be allocated for it -- and
+;;; we prefer that to go on the stack since it can.
+(progn
+ (defun call-with-system-mutex (function mutex &optional without-gcing-p)
+ (declare (function function))
+ (flet ((%call-with-system-mutex ()
+ (dx-let (got-it)
+ (unwind-protect
+ (when (setf got-it (get-mutex mutex))
+ (funcall function))
+ (when got-it
+ (release-mutex mutex))))))
+ (if without-gcing-p
+ (without-gcing
+ (%call-with-system-mutex))
+ (without-interrupts
+ (allow-with-interrupts (%call-with-system-mutex))))))
+
+ (defun call-with-system-spinlock (function spinlock &optional without-gcing-p)
+ (declare (function function))
+ (flet ((%call-with-system-spinlock ()
+ (dx-let (got-it)
+ (unwind-protect
+ (when (setf got-it (get-spinlock spinlock))
+ (funcall function))
+ (when got-it
+ (release-spinlock spinlock))))))
+ (if without-gcing-p
+ (without-gcing
+ (%call-with-system-spinlock))
+ (without-interrupts
+ (allow-with-interrupts (%call-with-system-spinlock))))))
+
+ (defun call-with-recursive-system-spinlock (function lock
+ &optional without-gcing-p)
+ (declare (function function))
+ (flet ((%call-with-system-spinlock ()
+ (dx-let ((inner-lock-p (eq *current-thread* (spinlock-value lock)))
+ (got-it nil))
+ (unwind-protect
+ (when (or inner-lock-p (setf got-it (get-spinlock lock)))
+ (funcall function))
+ (when got-it
+ (release-spinlock lock))))))
+ (if without-gcing-p
+ (without-gcing
+ (%call-with-system-spinlock))
+ (without-interrupts
+ (allow-with-interrupts (%call-with-system-spinlock))))))
+
+ (defun call-with-spinlock (function spinlock)
+ (declare (function function))
+ (dx-let ((got-it nil))
+ (without-interrupts
+ (unwind-protect
+ (when (setf got-it (allow-with-interrupts
+ (get-spinlock spinlock)))
+ (with-local-interrupts (funcall function)))
+ (when got-it
+ (release-spinlock spinlock))))))
+
+ (defun call-with-mutex (function mutex value waitp)
+ (declare (function function))
+ (dx-let ((got-it nil))
+ (without-interrupts
+ (unwind-protect
+ (when (setq got-it (allow-with-interrupts
+ (get-mutex mutex value waitp)))
+ (with-local-interrupts (funcall function)))
+ (when got-it
+ (release-mutex mutex))))))
+
+ (defun call-with-recursive-lock (function mutex)
+ (declare (function function))
+ (dx-let ((inner-lock-p (eq (mutex-value mutex) *current-thread*))
+ (got-it nil))
+ (without-interrupts
+ (unwind-protect
+ (when (or inner-lock-p (setf got-it (allow-with-interrupts
+ (get-mutex mutex))))
+ (with-local-interrupts (funcall function)))
+ (when got-it
+ (release-mutex mutex))))))
+
+
+
+ (defun call-with-recursive-spinlock (function spinlock)
+ (declare (function function))
+ (dx-let ((inner-lock-p (eq (spinlock-value spinlock) *current-thread*))
+ (got-it nil))
+ (without-interrupts
+ (unwind-protect
+ (when (or inner-lock-p (setf got-it (allow-with-interrupts
+ (get-spinlock spinlock))))
+ (with-local-interrupts (funcall function)))
+ (when got-it
+ (release-spinlock spinlock)))))))