(in-package "SB!C")
-;;; FIXME: Shouldn't SB!C::&MORE be in this list?
-(defconstant-eqx sb!xc:lambda-list-keywords
- '(&optional &rest &key &aux &body &whole &allow-other-keys &environment)
+;;; ANSI limits on compilation
+(def!constant sb!xc:call-arguments-limit most-positive-fixnum
+ #!+sb-doc
+ "The exclusive upper bound on the number of arguments which may be passed
+ to a function, including &REST args.")
+(def!constant sb!xc:lambda-parameters-limit most-positive-fixnum
#!+sb-doc
+ "The exclusive upper bound on the number of parameters which may be specifed
+ in a given lambda list. This is actually the limit on required and &OPTIONAL
+ parameters. With &KEY and &AUX you can get more.")
+(def!constant sb!xc:multiple-values-limit most-positive-fixnum
+ #!+sb-doc
+ "The exclusive upper bound on the number of multiple VALUES that you can
+ return.")
+
+(defconstant-eqx sb!xc:lambda-list-keywords
+ '(&allow-other-keys
+ &aux
+ &body
+ &environment
+ &key
+ &more
+ &optional
+ &rest
+ &whole)
#'equal
+ #!+sb-doc
"symbols which are magical in a lambda list")
\f
;;;; cross-compiler-only versions of CL special variables, so that we
;;; the type of LAYOUT-DEPTHOID slot values
(def!type sb!kernel::layout-depthoid () '(or index (integer -1 -1)))
-
-;;; a value for an optimization declaration
-(def!type policy-quality () '(or (rational 0 3) null))
-\f
-;;;; policy stuff
-
-;;; CMU CL used a special STRUCTURE-OBJECT type POLICY to represent
-;;; the state of optimization policy at any point in compilation. This
-;;; became a little unwieldy, especially because of cold init issues
-;;; for structures and structure accessors, so in SBCL we use an alist
-;;; instead.
-(deftype policy () 'list)
-
-;;; names of recognized optimization qualities which don't have
-;;; special defaulting behavior
-(defvar *policy-basic-qualities*)
-
-;;; FIXME: I'd like to get rid of DECLAIM OPTIMIZE-INTERFACE in favor
-;;; of e.g. (DECLAIM (OPTIMIZE (INTERFACE-SPEED 2) (INTERFACE-SAFETY 3))).
-#|
-;;; a list of conses (DEFAULTING-QUALITY . DEFAULT-QUALITY) of qualities
-;;; which default to other qualities when undefined, e.g. interface
-;;; speed defaulting to basic speed
-(defvar *policy-defaulting-qualities*)
-|#
-
-(defun optimization-quality-p (name)
- (or (member name *policy-basic-qualities*)
- ;; FIXME: Uncomment this when OPTIMIZE-INTERFACE goes away.
- #|(member name *policy-defaulting-qualities* :key #'car)|#))
-
-;;; *DEFAULT-POLICY* holds the current global compiler policy
-;;; information, as an alist mapping from optimization quality name to
-;;; quality value. Inside the scope of declarations, new entries are
-;;; added at the head of the alist.
-;;;
-;;; *DEFAULT-INTERFACE-POLICY* holds any values specified by an
-;;; OPTIMIZE-INTERFACE declaration.
-(declaim (type policy *default-policy* *default-interface-policy*))
-(defvar *default-policy*) ; initialized in cold init
-(defvar *default-interface-policy*) ; initialized in cold init
-
-;;; This is to be called early in cold init to set things up, and may
-;;; also be called again later in cold init in order to reset default
-;;; optimization policy back to default values after toplevel PROCLAIM
-;;; OPTIMIZE forms have messed with it.
-(defun !policy-cold-init-or-resanify ()
- (setf *policy-basic-qualities*
- '(;; ANSI standard qualities
- compilation-speed
- debug
- safety
- space
- speed
- ;; SBCL extensions
- ;;
- ;; FIXME: INHIBIT-WARNINGS is a misleading name for this.
- ;; Perhaps BREVITY would be better. But the ideal name would
- ;; have connotations of suppressing not warnings but only
- ;; optimization-related notes, which is already mostly the
- ;; behavior, and should probably become the exact behavior.
- ;; Perhaps INHIBIT-NOTES?
- inhibit-warnings))
- (setf *policy-defaulting-qualities*
- '((interface-speed . speed)
- (interface-safety . safety)))
- (setf *default-policy*
- (mapcar (lambda (name)
- ;; CMU CL didn't use 1 as the default for everything,
- ;; but since ANSI says 1 is the ordinary value, we do.
- (cons name 1))
- *policy-basic-qualities*))
- (setf *default-interface-policy*
- *default-policy*))
-;;; On the cross-compilation host, we initialize the compiler immediately.
-#+sb-xc-host (!policy-cold-init-or-resanify)
-
-;;; Is X the name of an optimization quality?
-(defun policy-quality-p (x)
- (memq x *policy-basic-qualities*))
\f
;;; possible values for the INLINE-ness of a function.
(deftype inlinep ()
(notinline . :notinline)
(maybe-inline . :maybe-inline)))
-;;; The lexical environment we are currently converting in.
+;;; the lexical environment we are currently converting in
(defvar *lexenv*)
(declaim (type lexenv *lexenv*))
-;;; *FREE-VARIABLES* translates from the names of variables referenced
-;;; globally to the LEAF structures for them. *FREE-FUNCTIONS* is like
-;;; *FREE-VARIABLES*, only it deals with function names.
-(defvar *free-variables*)
-(defvar *free-functions*)
-(declaim (hash-table *free-variables* *free-functions*))
+;;; *FREE-VARS* translates from the names of variables referenced
+;;; globally to the LEAF structures for them. *FREE-FUNS* is like
+;;; *FREE-VARS*, only it deals with function names.
+(defvar *free-vars*)
+(defvar *free-funs*)
+(declaim (type hash-table *free-vars* *free-funs*))
-;;; We use the same Constant structure to represent all equal anonymous
-;;; constants. This hashtable translates from constants to the Leafs that
+;;; We use the same CONSTANT structure to represent all equal anonymous
+;;; constants. This hashtable translates from constants to the LEAFs that
;;; represent them.
(defvar *constants*)
-(declaim (hash-table *constants*))
+(declaim (type hash-table *constants*))
;;; miscellaneous forward declarations
(defvar *code-segment*)
(defvar *compiler-warning-count*)
(defvar *compiler-style-warning-count*)
(defvar *compiler-note-count*)
-(defvar *converting-for-interpreter*)
+(defvar *compiler-trace-output*)
+(defvar *constraint-number*)
(defvar *count-vop-usages*)
(defvar *current-path*)
(defvar *current-component*)
-(defvar *default-policy*)
-(defvar *default-interface-policy*)
+(defvar *delayed-ir1-transforms*)
+(defvar *policy*)
(defvar *dynamic-counts-tn*)
(defvar *elsewhere*)
(defvar *event-info*)
(defvar *trace-table*)
(defvar *undefined-warnings*)
(defvar *warnings-p*)
+
+;;; unique ID for the next object created (to let us track object
+;;; identity even across GC, useful for understanding weird compiler
+;;; bugs where something is supposed to be unique but is instead
+;;; exists as duplicate objects)
+#!+sb-show
+(progn
+ (defvar *object-id-counter* 0)
+ (defun new-object-id ()
+ (prog1
+ *object-id-counter*
+ (incf *object-id-counter*))))
\f
;;;; miscellaneous utilities
note-name-defined))
(defun note-name-defined (name kind)
;; We do this BOUNDP check because this function can be called when
- ;; not in a compilation unit (as when loading top-level forms).
+ ;; not in a compilation unit (as when loading top level forms).
(when (boundp '*undefined-warnings*)
(setq *undefined-warnings*
(delete-if (lambda (x)
;;; to be called when a variable is lexically bound
(declaim (ftype (function (symbol) (values)) note-lexical-binding))
(defun note-lexical-binding (symbol)
- (let ((name (symbol-name symbol)))
;; This check is intended to protect us from getting silently
;; burned when we define
;; foo.lisp:
;; (LET ((*FOO* X))
;; (FOO 14)))
;; and then we happen to compile bar.lisp before foo.lisp.
- (when (and (char= #\* (aref name 0))
- (char= #\* (aref name (1- (length name)))))
- ;; FIXME: should be COMPILER-STYLE-WARNING?
- (style-warn "using the lexical binding of the symbol ~S, not the~@
+ (when (looks-like-name-of-special-var-p symbol)
+ ;; FIXME: should be COMPILER-STYLE-WARNING?
+ (style-warn "using the lexical binding of the symbol ~S, not the~@
dynamic binding, even though the symbol name follows the usual naming~@
-convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" symbol)))
+convention (names like *FOO*) for special variables" symbol))
(values))