(let ((kind (info :variable :kind name))
(type (info :variable :type name))
(where-from (info :variable :where-from name)))
- (when (and (eq where-from :assumed) (eq kind :global))
+ (when (eq kind :unknown)
(note-undefined-reference name :variable))
(setf (gethash name *free-vars*)
(case kind
;; KLUDGE: If the reference is dead, convert using SYMBOL-VALUE
;; which is not flushable, so that unbound dead variables signal
;; an error (bug 412).
- (ir1-convert start next result `(symbol-value ',name))
+ (ir1-convert start next result
+ (if (eq (global-var-kind var) :global)
+ `(symbol-global-value ',name)
+ `(symbol-value ',name)))
(etypecase var
(leaf
(when (lambda-var-p var)
(declare (list spec vars) (type lexenv res))
(collect ((new-venv nil cons))
(dolist (name (cdr spec))
+ ;; While CLHS seems to allow local SPECIAL declarations for constants,
+ ;; whatever the semantics are supposed to be is not at all clear to me
+ ;; -- since constants aren't allowed to be bound it should be a no-op as
+ ;; no-one can observe the difference portably, but specials are allowed
+ ;; to be bound... yet nowhere does it say that the special declaration
+ ;; removes the constantness. Call it a spec bug and prohibit it. Same
+ ;; for GLOBAL variables.
+ (let ((kind (info :variable :kind name)))
+ (unless (member kind '(:special :unknown))
+ (error "Can't declare ~(~A~) variable locally special: ~S" kind name)))
(program-assert-symbol-home-package-unlocked
context name "declaring ~A special")
(let ((var (find-in-bindings vars name)))
(t
(unless (info :declaration :recognized (first spec))
(compiler-warn "unrecognized declaration ~S" raw-spec))
- res))
+ (let ((fn (info :declaration :handler (first spec))))
+ (if fn
+ (funcall fn res spec vars fvars)
+ res))))
result-type)))
;;; Use a list of DECLARE forms to annotate the lists of LAMBDA-VAR