;;; Break something like a lambda list (but not necessarily actually a
;;; lambda list, e.g. the representation of argument types which is
;;; used within an FTYPE specification) into its component parts. We
-;;; return eleven values:
+;;; return twelve values:
;;; 1. a list of the required args;
;;; 2. a list of the &OPTIONAL arg specs;
;;; 3. true if a &REST arg was specified;
;;; 5. true if &KEY args are present;
;;; 6. a list of the &KEY arg specs;
;;; 7. true if &ALLOW-OTHER-KEYS was specified.;
-;;; 8. a list of the &AUX specifiers;
-;;; 9. true if a &MORE arg was specified;
-;;; 10. the &MORE context var;
-;;; 11. the &MORE count var.
+;;; 8. true if any &AUX is present (new in SBCL vs. CMU CL);
+;;; 9. a list of the &AUX specifiers;
+;;; 10. true if a &MORE arg was specified;
+;;; 11. the &MORE context var;
+;;; 12. the &MORE count var;
+;;; 13. true if any lambda list keyword is present (only for
+;;; PARSE-LAMBDA-LIST-LIKE-THING).
;;;
;;; The top level lambda list syntax is checked for validity, but the
;;; arg specifiers are just passed through untouched. If something is
;;; wrong, we use COMPILER-ERROR, aborting compilation to the last
;;; recovery point.
-(declaim (ftype (function (list)
- (values list list boolean t boolean list boolean
- list boolean t t))
- parse-lambda-list-like-thing
+(declaim (ftype (sfunction (list)
+ (values list list boolean t boolean list boolean
+ boolean list boolean t t boolean))
+ parse-lambda-list-like-thing))
+(declaim (ftype (sfunction (list)
+ (values list list boolean t boolean list boolean
+ boolean list boolean t t))
parse-lambda-list))
(defun parse-lambda-list-like-thing (list)
(collect ((required)
(more-context nil)
(more-count nil)
(keyp nil)
+ (auxp nil)
(allowp nil)
(state :required))
(declare (type (member :allow-other-keys :aux
(&aux
(when (member state '(:rest :more-context :more-count))
(compiler-error "misplaced &AUX in lambda list: ~S" list))
- (setq state :aux))
+ (setq auxp t
+ state :aux))
;; FIXME: I don't think ANSI says this is an error. (It
;; should certainly be good for a STYLE-WARNING,
;; though.)
arg)))))
(when (eq state :rest)
(compiler-error "&REST without rest variable"))
-
- (values (required) (optional) restp rest keyp (keys) allowp (aux)
- morep more-context more-count))))
+
+ (values (required) (optional) restp rest keyp (keys) allowp auxp (aux)
+ morep more-context more-count
+ (neq state :required)))))
;;; like PARSE-LAMBDA-LIST-LIKE-THING, except our LAMBDA-LIST argument
;;; really *is* a lambda list, not just a "lambda-list-like thing", so
(defun parse-lambda-list (lambda-list)
;; Classify parameters without checking their validity individually.
- (multiple-value-bind (required optional restp rest keyp keys allowp aux
+ (multiple-value-bind (required optional restp rest keyp keys allowp auxp aux
morep more-context more-count)
(parse-lambda-list-like-thing lambda-list)
i))))))
;; Voila.
- (values required optional restp rest keyp keys allowp aux
+ (values required optional restp rest keyp keys allowp auxp aux
morep more-context more-count)))
(/show0 "parse-lambda-list.lisp end of file")