;;; In all cases, SET-FUNCTION-NAME must return the new (or same)
;;; function. (Unlike other functions to set stuff, it does not return
;;; the new value.)
-;;;
-;;; FIXME: A similar operation is done in
-;;; TRY-TO-RENAME-INTERPRETED-FUNCTION-AS-MACRO. The code should be
-;;; shared.
(defun set-function-name (fcn new-name)
#+sb-doc
"Set the name of a compiled function object. Return the function."
(set-function-name (sb-kernel:byte-closure-function fcn)
new-name))
(sb-kernel:byte-function
- (setf (sb-kernel:byte-function-name fcn) new-name))
- #+sb-interpreter
- (sb-eval:interpreted-function
- (setf (sb-eval:interpreted-function-name fcn) new-name))))
+ (setf (sb-kernel:byte-function-name fcn) new-name))))
fcn)
(t
;; pw-- This seems wrong and causes trouble. Tests show