(let ((testcases '(;; Bug 126, confusion between high-level default string
;; initial element #\SPACE and low-level default array
;; element #\NULL, is gone.
- (#\null (make-array 11 :element-type 'character))
- (#\space (make-string 11 :initial-element #\space))
+ (#\null (make-array 11 :element-type 'character) simple-string)
+ (#\space (make-string 11 :initial-element #\space) string)
(#\* (make-string 11 :initial-element #\*))
(#\null (make-string 11))
(#\null (make-string 11 :initial-element #\null))
(#\x (make-string 11 :initial-element #\x))
;; And the other tweaks made when fixing bug 126 didn't
;; mess things up too badly either.
- (0 (make-array 11))
+ (0 (make-array 11) simple-vector)
(nil (make-array 11 :initial-element nil))
(12 (make-array 11 :initial-element 12))
- (0 (make-array 11 :element-type '(unsigned-byte 4)))
+ (0 (make-array 11 :element-type '(unsigned-byte 4)) (simple-array (unsigned-byte 4) (*)))
(12 (make-array 11
:element-type '(unsigned-byte 4)
:initial-element 12)))))
(dolist (testcase testcases)
- (destructuring-bind (expected-result form) testcase
+ (destructuring-bind (expected-result form &optional type) testcase
(unless (eql expected-result (aref (eval form) 3))
(error "expected ~S in EVAL ~S" expected-result form))
(unless (eql expected-result
(aref (funcall (compile nil `(lambda () ,form))) 3))
- (error "expected ~S in FUNCALL COMPILE ~S" expected-result form)))))
+ (error "expected ~S in FUNCALL COMPILE ~S" expected-result form))
+ ;; also do some testing of compilation and verification that
+ ;; errors are thrown appropriately.
+ (unless (eql expected-result
+ (funcall (compile nil `(lambda () (aref ,form 3)))))
+ (error "expected ~S in COMPILED-AREF ~S" expected-result form))
+ (when type
+ (unless (eql expected-result
+ (funcall (compile nil `(lambda () (let ((x ,form))
+ (declare (type ,type x))
+ (aref x 3))))))
+ (error "expected ~S in COMPILED-DECLARED-AREF ~S" expected-result form)))
+ (when (ignore-errors (aref (eval form) 12))
+ (error "error not thrown in EVAL ~S" form))
+ (when (ignore-errors (aref (funcall (compile nil `(lambda () ,form))) 12))
+ (error "error not thrown in FUNCALL COMPILE ~S"))
+ (when (ignore-errors (funcall (compile nil `(lambda () (aref ,form 12)))))
+ (error "error not thrown in COMPILED-AREF ~S" form))
+ (when type
+ (when (ignore-errors (funcall
+ (compile nil `(lambda () (let ((x ,form))
+ (declare (type ,type x))
+ (aref x 12))))))
+ (error "error not thrown in COMPILED-DECLARED-AREF ~S" form))))))
+
+;;; On the SPARC, until sbcl-0.7.7.20, there was a bug in array
+;;; references for small vector elements (spotted by Raymond Toy); the
+;;; bug persisted on the PPC until sbcl-0.7.8.20.
+(let (vector)
+ (loop for i below 64
+ for list = (make-list 64 :initial-element 1)
+ do (setf (nth i list) 0)
+ do (setf vector (make-array 64 :element-type 'bit
+ :initial-contents list))
+ do (assert (= (funcall
+ (compile nil
+ `(lambda (rmdr)
+ (declare (type (simple-array bit (*)) rmdr)
+ (optimize (speed 3) (safety 0)))
+ (aref rmdr ,i)))
+ vector)
+ 0))))
+
+;;; Following refactoring of sequence functions to detect bad type
+;;; specifiers, REVERSE was left broken on vectors with fill pointers.
+(let ((a (make-array 10
+ :fill-pointer 5
+ :element-type 'character
+ :initial-contents "abcdefghij")))
+ (assert (string= (reverse a) "edcba")))
+
+;;; ARRAY-IN-BOUNDS-P should work when given non-INDEXes as its
+;;; subscripts (and return NIL, of course)
+(let ((a (make-array 10 :fill-pointer 5)))
+ (assert (not (array-in-bounds-p a -1)))
+ (assert (array-in-bounds-p a 3))
+ (assert (array-in-bounds-p a 7))
+ (assert (not (array-in-bounds-p a 11)))
+ (assert (not (array-in-bounds-p a (1+ most-positive-fixnum)))))
+
+;;; arrays of bits should work:
+(let ((a (make-array '(10 10) :element-type 'bit :adjustable t)))
+ (setf (bit a 0 0) 1)
+ (assert (= (bit a 0 0) 1)))
+(let ((a (make-array '(10 10) :element-type 'bit)))
+ (setf (sbit a 0 0) 1)
+ (assert (= (sbit a 0 0) 1)))
+
+(let ((x (copy-seq #*0011))
+ (y (copy-seq #*0101)))
+ (assert (equalp (bit-and x y nil) #*0001)))
+
+;;; arrays of NIL should work, FSVO "work".
+(let ((a (make-array '(10 10) :element-type 'nil)))
+ (assert (= (array-total-size a) 100))
+ (assert (equal (array-dimensions a) '(10 10)))
+ (assert (eq (array-element-type a) 'nil)))
+
+(assert (eq (upgraded-array-element-type 'nil) 'nil))
+
+(multiple-value-bind (fun warn fail)
+ (compile nil '(lambda () (aref (make-array 0) 0)))
+ #+nil (assert fail) ; doesn't work, (maybe because ASSERTED-TYPE is NIL?)
+ (assert (raises-error? (funcall fun) type-error)))
+
+(multiple-value-bind (fun warn fail)
+ (compile nil '(lambda () (aref (make-array 1) 1)))
+ (assert fail)
+ (assert (raises-error? (funcall fun) type-error)))
+
+(multiple-value-bind (fun warn fail)
+ (compile nil '(lambda () (make-array 5 :element-type 'undefined-type)))
+ (assert warn))
+
+(flet ((opaque-identity (x) x))
+ (declare (notinline opaque-identity))
+ ;; we used to have leakage from cross-compilation hosts of the INDEX
+ ;; type, which prevented us from actually using all the large array
+ ;; dimensions that we promised. Let's make sure that we can create
+ ;; an array with more than 2^24 elements, since that was a symptom
+ ;; from the CLISP and OpenMCL hosts.
+ (let ((big-array (opaque-identity
+ (make-array (expt 2 26) :element-type 'bit))))
+ (assert (= (length big-array) (expt 2 26)))))
+
+;;; Bug reported by Kalle Olavi Niemitalo for CMUCL through Debian BTS
+(let ((array (make-array nil :initial-contents nil)))
+ (assert (eql (aref array) nil)))
+
+(let ((f (compile nil '(lambda ()
+ (let ((a (make-array '(4)
+ :element-type 'base-char
+ :initial-element #\z)))
+ (setf (aref a 0) #\a)
+ (setf (aref a 1) #\b)
+ (setf (aref a 2) #\c)
+ a)))))
+ (assert (= (length (funcall f)) 4)))