(type-error (c)
(return-from return :good))))
:good))
-
+\f
+;;;; MUFFLE-CONDITIONS test (corresponds to the test in the manual)
+(defvar *compiler-note-count* 0)
+#-alpha ; FIXME: make a better test!
+(handler-bind ((sb-ext:compiler-note (lambda (c)
+ (declare (ignore c))
+ (incf *compiler-note-count*))))
+ (let ((fun
+ (compile nil
+ '(lambda (x)
+ (declare (optimize speed) (fixnum x))
+ (declare (sb-ext:muffle-conditions sb-ext:compiler-note))
+ (values (* x 5) ; no compiler note from this
+ (locally
+ (declare (sb-ext:unmuffle-conditions sb-ext:compiler-note))
+ ;; this one gives a compiler note
+ (* x -5)))))))
+ (assert (= *compiler-note-count* 1))
+ (assert (equal (multiple-value-list (funcall fun 1)) '(5 -5)))))
+\f
+(handler-case
+ (eval '(flet ((%f (&key) nil)) (%f nil nil)))
+ (error (c) :good)
+ (:no-error (val) (error "no error: ~S" val)))
+(handler-case
+ (eval '(labels ((%f (&key x) x)) (%f nil nil)))
+ (error (c) :good)
+ (:no-error (val) (error "no error: ~S" val)))
\f
;;;; tests not in the problem domain, but of the consistency of the
;;;; compiler machinery itself