;;;; This file is for testing debugging functionality, using
-;;;; test machinery which might have side effects (e.g.
+;;;; test machinery which might have side effects (e.g.
;;;; executing DEFUN).
;;;; This software is part of the SBCL system. See the README file for
;;;; While most of SBCL is derived from the CMU CL system, the test
;;;; files (like this one) were written from scratch after the fork
;;;; from CMU CL.
-;;;;
+;;;;
;;;; This software is in the public domain and is provided with
;;;; absolutely no warranty. See the COPYING and CREDITS files for
;;;; more information.
(cl:in-package :cl-user)
+
+;;; The debugger doesn't have any native knowledge of the interpreter
+(when (eq sb-ext:*evaluator-mode* :interpret)
+ (sb-ext:quit :unix-status 104))
+
\f
;;;; Check that we get debug arglists right.
(#.sb-vm:simple-fun-header-widetag
(sb-kernel:%simple-fun-arglist fun))
(#.sb-vm:closure-header-widetag (get-arglist
- (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun)))
+ (sb-kernel:%closure-fun fun)))
;; In code/describe.lisp, ll. 227 (%describe-fun), we use a scheme
;; like above, and it seems to work. -- MNA 2001-06-12
;;
;; happen to be the two case that I had my nose rubbed in when
;; debugging a GC problem caused by applying %SIMPLE-FUN-ARGLIST to
;; a closure. -- WHN 2001-06-05)
- (t :unknown)))
+ (t
+ #+sb-eval
+ (if (typep fun 'sb-eval::interpreted-function)
+ (sb-eval::interpreted-function-lambda-list fun)
+ :unknown)
+ #-sb-eval
+ :unknown)))
(defun zoop (zeep &key beep)
blurp)
;;; and hasn't been cut off anywhere.
(defun verify-backtrace (test-function frame-specs &key (allow-stunted nil))
(labels ((args-equal (want real)
- (cond ((endp want)
- (endp real))
- ((eq '&rest (car want))
+ (cond ((eq '&rest (car want))
t)
+ ((endp want)
+ (endp real))
((or (eq '? (car want)) (equal (car want) (car real)))
(args-equal (cdr want) (cdr real)))
(t
(handler-bind
((error (lambda (condition)
;; find the part of the backtrace we're interested in
- (let ((backtrace (progn
- ;; (backtrace 13)
- (member (caar frame-specs)
- (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list)
- :key #'car
- :test #'equal))))
-
+ (let* ((full-backtrace (sb-debug:backtrace-as-list))
+ (backtrace (member (caar frame-specs) full-backtrace
+ :key #'car
+ :test #'equal)))
+
(setf result condition)
-
+
(unless backtrace
- (print :missing-backtrace)
+ (format t "~&//~S not in backtrace:~% ~S~%"
+ (caar frame-specs)
+ full-backtrace)
(setf result nil))
-
+
;; check that we have all the frames we wanted
- (mapcar
+ (mapcar
(lambda (spec frame)
(unless (or (not spec)
(and (equal (car spec) (car frame))
- (args-equal (cdr spec)
+ (args-equal (cdr spec)
(cdr frame))))
(print (list :mismatch spec frame))
(setf result nil)))
frame-specs
backtrace)
-
+
;; Make sure the backtrace isn't stunted in
;; any way. (Depends on running in the main
- ;; thread.)
- (let ((end (last backtrace 2)))
- (unless (equal (caar end)
- (if *show-entry-point-details*
- '(sb-c::tl-xep sb-impl::toplevel-init)
- 'sb-impl::toplevel-init))
+ ;; thread.) FIXME: On Windows we get two
+ ;; extra foreign frames below regular frames.
+ (let ((end (last backtrace #-win32 2 #+win32 4)))
+ (unless (equal (caar end)
+ 'sb-impl::toplevel-init)
(print (list :backtrace-stunted (caar end)))
(setf result nil)))
(return-from outer-handler)))))
'(#+(or x86 x86-64) "bogus stack frame"
#-(or x86 x86-64) "undefined function"))
-#-(or alpha) ; bug 346
;;; Test for "undefined function" (undefined_tramp) working properly.
;;; Try it with and without tail call elimination, since they can have
;;; different effects. (Specifically, if undefined_tramp is incorrect
(declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
(funcall fun)))
- (assert (verify-backtrace
- (lambda () (test #'optimized))
- (list *undefined-function-frame*
- (list '(flet test) #'optimized))))
-
- (assert (verify-backtrace
- (lambda () (test #'not-optimized))
- (list *undefined-function-frame*
- (list '(flet not-optimized))
- (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized)))))
-
-#-alpha ; bug 346
-;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the
+ (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-346)
+ :fails-on '(or :alpha :ppc :sparc :mips
+ (and :x86-64 (or :freebsd :darwin))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace
+ (lambda () (test #'optimized))
+ (list *undefined-function-frame*
+ (list '(flet test) #'optimized)))))
+
+ ;; bug 353: This test fails at least most of the time for x86/linux
+ ;; ca. 0.8.20.16. -- WHN
+ (with-test (:name (:undefined-function :bug-353)
+ ;; This used to have fewer :fails-on features pre-0.9.16.38,
+ ;; but it turns out that the bug was just being masked by
+ ;; the presence of the IR1 stepper instrumentation (and
+ ;; is thus again failing now that the instrumentation is
+ ;; no more).
+ :fails-on '(or :alpha :mips :ppc))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace
+ (lambda () (test #'not-optimized))
+ (list *undefined-function-frame*
+ (list '(flet not-optimized))
+ (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))))
+
+;;; Division by zero was a common error on PPC. It depended on the
;;; return function either being before INTEGER-/-INTEGER in memory,
-;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on
-;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy
+;;; or more than MOST-POSITIVE-FIXNUM bytes ahead. It also depends on
+;;; INTEGER-/-INTEGER calling SIGNED-TRUNCATE. I believe Raymond Toy
;;; says that the Sparc backend (at least for CMUCL) inlines this, so
;;; if SBCL does the same this test is probably not good for the
;;; Sparc.
(test (fun)
(declare (optimize (speed 1) (debug 2))) ; no tail call elimination
(funcall fun)))
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized))
- (list '(/ 42 &rest)
- (list '(flet test) #'optimized))))
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized))
- (list '(/ 42 &rest)
- '((flet not-optimized))
- (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized)))))
-
-#-(or alpha (and x86 linux)) ; bug 61
-(progn
- (defun throw-test ()
- (throw 'no-such-tag t))
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test '((throw-test)))))
+ (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-346)
+ :fails-on '(or :alpha (and :x86-64 :darwin))) ; bug 346
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'optimized))
+ (list '(/ 42 &rest)
+ (list '(flet test) #'optimized)))))
+ (with-test (:name (:divide-by-zero :bug-356)
+ :fails-on '(or :alpha (and :x86-64 :darwin))) ; bug 356
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (test #'not-optimized))
+ (list '(/ 42 &rest)
+ '((flet not-optimized))
+ (list '(flet test) #'not-optimized))))))
+
+(with-test (:name (:throw :no-such-tag)
+ :fails-on '(or
+ (and :sparc :linux)
+ :alpha
+ :mips))
+ (progn
+ (defun throw-test ()
+ (throw 'no-such-tag t))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'throw-test '((throw-test))))))
;;; test entry point handling in backtraces
(defun oops ()
(error "oops"))
-(defun bt.1 (&key key)
+(defmacro defbt (n ll &body body)
+ `(progn
+ ;; normal debug info
+ (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.1" n)) ,ll
+ ,@body)
+ ;; no arguments saved
+ (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.2" n)) ,ll
+ (declare (optimize (debug 1) (speed 3)))
+ ,@body)
+ ;; no lambda-list saved
+ (defun ,(intern (format nil "BT.~A.3" n)) ,ll
+ (declare (optimize (debug 0)))
+ ,@body)))
+
+(defbt 1 (&key key)
(list key))
-(defun bt.2 (x)
+(defbt 2 (x)
(list x))
-(defun bt.3 (&key (key (oops)))
+(defbt 3 (&key (key (oops)))
(list key))
;;; ERROR instead of OOPS so that tail call elimination doesn't happen
-(defun bt.4 (&optional opt)
+(defbt 4 (&optional opt)
(list (error "error")))
-(defun bt.5 (&optional (opt (oops)))
+(defbt 5 (&optional (opt (oops)))
(list opt))
-#-(and x86 linux)
-(macrolet ((with-details (bool &body body)
- `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool))
- ,@body)))
+(defmacro with-details (bool &body body)
+ `(let ((sb-debug:*show-entry-point-details* ,bool))
+ ,@body))
- ;; &MORE-PROCESSOR
- (with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1 :key))
- '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1) &rest)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1 :key))
- '((bt.1 :key)))))
+(defun bug-354 (x)
+ (error "XEPs in backtraces: ~S" x))
- ;; XEP
+(with-test (:name :bug-354)
(with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2
- '(((sb-c::xep bt.2) 0 ?)))))
- (with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2
- '((bt.2)))))
+ (assert (not (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354))
+ '((bug-354 &rest)
+ ((sb-c::tl-xep bug-354) &rest))))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bug-354 354)) '((bug-354 354)))))
- ;; TL-XEP
+;;; FIXME: This test really should be broken into smaller pieces
+(with-test (:name (:backtrace :misc)
+ :fails-on '(or (and :x86 (or :sunos)) (and :x86-64 :darwin)))
+ (write-line "//tl-xep")
(with-details t
(assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
'(((sb-c::tl-xep namestring) 0 ?)))))
(assert (verify-backtrace #'namestring
'((namestring)))))
+ ;; &MORE-PROCESSOR
+ (with-details t
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
+ '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.1) &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
+ '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.2) &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
+ '(((sb-c::&more-processor bt.1.3) &rest)))))
+ (with-details nil
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.1 :key))
+ '((bt.1.1 :key))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.2 :key))
+ '((bt.1.2 &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (bt.1.3 :key))
+ '((bt.1.3 &rest)))))
+
+ ;; XEP
+ (write-line "//xep")
+ (with-details t
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
+ '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.1) 0 ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
+ '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.2) &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
+ '(((sb-c::xep bt.2.3) &rest)))))
+ (with-details nil
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.1
+ '((bt.2.1))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.2
+ '((bt.2.2 &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.2.3
+ '((bt.2.3 &rest)))))
+
;; VARARGS-ENTRY
+ (write-line "//varargs-entry")
(with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3
- '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3) :key nil)))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
+ '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.1) :key nil))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
+ '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.2) :key ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
+ '(((sb-c::varargs-entry bt.3.3) &rest)))))
(with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3
- '((bt.3 :key nil)))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.1
+ '((bt.3.1 :key nil))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.2
+ '((bt.3.2 :key ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.3.3
+ '((bt.3.3 &rest)))))
;; HAIRY-ARG-PROCESSOR
+ (write-line "//hairy-args-processor")
(with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4
- '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4) ?)))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
+ '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.1) ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
+ '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.2) ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
+ '(((sb-c::hairy-arg-processor bt.4.3) &rest)))))
(with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4
- '((bt.4 ?)))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.1
+ '((bt.4.1 ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.2
+ '((bt.4.2 ?))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.4.3
+ '((bt.4.3 &rest)))))
;; &OPTIONAL-PROCESSOR
+ (write-line "//optional-processor")
(with-details t
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5
- '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5))))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
+ '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.1)))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
+ '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.2) &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
+ '(((sb-c::&optional-processor bt.5.3) &rest)))))
(with-details nil
- (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5
- '((bt.5))))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.1
+ '((bt.5.1))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.2
+ '((bt.5.2 &rest))))
+ (assert (verify-backtrace #'bt.5.3
+ '((bt.5.3 &rest))))))
+
+(write-line "//compile nil")
+(defvar *compile-nil-error* (compile nil '(lambda (x) (cons (when x (error "oops")) nil))))
+(defvar *compile-nil-non-tc* (compile nil '(lambda (y) (cons (funcall *compile-nil-error* y) nil))))
+(assert (verify-backtrace (lambda () (funcall *compile-nil-non-tc* 13))
+ '(((lambda (x)) 13)
+ ((lambda (y)) 13))))
+
+(with-test (:name :clos-slot-typecheckfun-named)
+ (assert
+ (verify-backtrace
+ (lambda ()
+ (eval `(locally (declare (optimize safety))
+ (defclass clos-typecheck-test ()
+ ((slot :type fixnum)))
+ (setf (slot-value (make-instance 'clos-typecheck-test) 'slot) t))))
+ '(((sb-pcl::slot-typecheck clos-typecheck-test slot) t)))))
+
+(with-test (:name :clos-emf-named)
+ (assert
+ (verify-backtrace
+ (lambda ()
+ (eval `(progn
+ (defmethod clos-emf-named-test ((x symbol)) x)
+ (defmethod clos-emf-named-test :before (x) (assert x))
+ (clos-emf-named-test nil))))
+ '(((sb-pcl::emf clos-emf-named-test) ? ? nil)))))
+
+;;;; test TRACE
+
+(defun trace-this ()
+ 'ok)
+
+(defun trace-fact (n)
+ (if (zerop n)
+ 1
+ (* n (trace-fact (1- n)))))
+
+(let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
+ (trace trace-this)
+ (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this)))
+ (untrace))))
+ (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out))
+ (assert (search "returned OK" out)))
+
+;;; bug 379
+;;; This is not a WITH-TEST :FAILS-ON PPC DARWIN since there are
+;;; suspicions that the breakpoint trace might corrupt the whole image
+;;; on that platform.
+#-(and (or ppc x86 x86-64) darwin)
+(with-test (:name (trace :encapsulate nil)
+ :fails-on '(or (and :ppc (not :linux)) :sparc :mips))
+ (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
+ (trace trace-this :encapsulate nil)
+ (assert (eq 'ok (trace-this)))
+ (untrace))))
+ (assert (search "TRACE-THIS" out))
+ (assert (search "returned OK" out))))
+
+#-(and (or ppc x86 x86-64) darwin)
+(with-test (:name (trace-recursive :encapsulate nil)
+ :fails-on '(or (and :ppc (not :linux)) :sparc :mips))
+ (let ((out (with-output-to-string (*trace-output*)
+ (trace trace-fact :encapsulate nil)
+ (assert (= 120 (trace-fact 5)))
+ (untrace))))
+ (assert (search "TRACE-FACT" out))
+ (assert (search "returned 1" out))
+ (assert (search "returned 120" out))))
+
+(with-test (:name :bug-414)
+ (handler-bind ((warning #'error))
+ (load (compile-file "bug-414.lisp"))
+ (disassemble 'bug-414)))
+
+;;;; test infinite error protection
+
+(defmacro nest-errors (n-levels error-form)
+ (if (< 0 n-levels)
+ `(handler-bind ((error (lambda (condition)
+ (declare (ignore condition))
+ ,error-form)))
+ (nest-errors ,(1- n-levels) ,error-form))
+ error-form))
+
+(defun erroring-debugger-hook (condition old-debugger-hook)
+ (let ((*debugger-hook* old-debugger-hook))
+ (format t "recursive condition: ~A~%" condition) (force-output)
+ (error "recursive condition: ~A" condition)))
+
+(defun test-inifinite-error-protection ()
+ ;; after 50 successful throws to SB-IMPL::TOPLEVEL-CATCHER sbcl used
+ ;; to halt, it produces so much garbage that's hard to suppress that
+ ;; it is tested only once
+ (write-line "--HARMLESS BUT ALARMING BACKTRACE COMING UP--")
+ (let ((*debugger-hook* #'erroring-debugger-hook))
+ (loop repeat 1 do
+ (let ((error-counter 0)
+ (*terminal-io* (make-broadcast-stream)))
+ (assert
+ (not (eq
+ :normal-exit
+ (catch 'sb-impl::toplevel-catcher
+ (nest-errors 20 (error "infinite error ~s"
+ (incf error-counter)))
+ :normal-exit)))))))
+ (write-line "--END OF H-B-A-B--"))
+
+(enable-debugger)
+
+(test-inifinite-error-protection)
+
+#+sb-thread
+(let ((thread (sb-thread:make-thread #'test-inifinite-error-protection)))
+ (loop while (sb-thread:thread-alive-p thread)))
+
+(disable-debugger)
-;;; success
-(quit :unix-status 104)
+(write-line "/debug.impure.lisp done")