+Bill Newman:
+ He continued to maintain SBCL after the fork, increasing ANSI
+ compliance, fixing bugs, regularizing the internals of the
+ system, deleting unused extensions, improving performance in
+ some areas (especially sequence functions and non-simple vectors),
+ updating documentation, and even, for better or worse, getting
+ rid of various functionality (e.g. the byte interpreter).
+
+Christophe Rhodes:
+ He has done various low-level work on SBCL, especially for the
+ SPARC port (and for CPU-architecture-neutral things motivated by
+ it, like *BACKEND-FEATURES*). He's also contributed miscellaneous
+ bug fixes.
+
+Raymond Toy:
+ He continued to work on CMU CL after the SBCL fork, especially on
+ floating point stuff. Various patches and fixes of his have been
+ ported to SBCL.
+