-under Emacs. The Emacs "ilisp" mode provides many convenient features,
-like command line editing, tab completion, and various kinds of
-coupling between Common Lisp source files and the interactive SBCL
-subprocess, but can be somewhat fragile because it tries to be so
-clever and intimate in its interactions with the Lisp subprocess. In
-case of ilisp problems, running SBCL in the Emacs "shell" mode can a
-useful substitute.
+under Emacs. The Emacs "Slime" and "ilisp" modes provide many
+convenient features, like command line editing, tab completion, and
+various kinds of coupling between Common Lisp source files and the
+interactive SBCL subprocess, but they can be somewhat fragile wrt.
+packages and readtables, in which case SBCL in the Emacs "shell" mode
+can a useful substitute.