"*BACKEND-BYTE-ORDER*" "*BACKEND-DISASSEM-PARAMS*"
"*BACKEND-INSTRUCTION-FLAVORS*" "*BACKEND-INSTRUCTION-FORMATS*"
"*BACKEND-BYTE-ORDER*" "*BACKEND-DISASSEM-PARAMS*"
"*BACKEND-INSTRUCTION-FLAVORS*" "*BACKEND-INSTRUCTION-FORMATS*"
"*BACKEND-REGISTER-SAVE-PENALTY*"
"*BACKEND-SB-LIST*" "*BACKEND-SB-NAMES*"
"*BACKEND-SC-NAMES*" "*BACKEND-SC-NUMBERS*"
"*BACKEND-REGISTER-SAVE-PENALTY*"
"*BACKEND-SB-LIST*" "*BACKEND-SB-NAMES*"
"*BACKEND-SC-NAMES*" "*BACKEND-SC-NUMBERS*"
;; This is something which must exist inside any Common
;; Lisp implementation, and which someone writing a
;; customized toplevel might well want. It seems perverse
;; This is something which must exist inside any Common
;; Lisp implementation, and which someone writing a
;; customized toplevel might well want. It seems perverse
"VECTOR-TO-VECTOR*"
"VECTOR-OF-CHECKED-LENGTH-GIVEN-LENGTH" "WITH-ARRAY-DATA"
"WITH-CIRCULARITY-DETECTION" "WRONG-NUMBER-OF-INDICES-ERROR"
"VECTOR-TO-VECTOR*"
"VECTOR-OF-CHECKED-LENGTH-GIVEN-LENGTH" "WITH-ARRAY-DATA"
"WITH-CIRCULARITY-DETECTION" "WRONG-NUMBER-OF-INDICES-ERROR"
#!+ppc "PSEUDO-ATOMIC-INTERRUPTED-FLAG"
#!+ppc "PSEUDO-ATOMIC-FLAG"
"GENESIS" "HALT-TRAP" "IGNORE-ME-SC-NUMBER"
#!+ppc "PSEUDO-ATOMIC-INTERRUPTED-FLAG"
#!+ppc "PSEUDO-ATOMIC-FLAG"
"GENESIS" "HALT-TRAP" "IGNORE-ME-SC-NUMBER"