+ ;; and given how many users dislike strict treatment of
+ ;; DEFCONSTANT, let's give them enough rope to escape by
+ "DEFCONSTANT-UNEQL" "DEFCONSTANT-UNEQL-NAME"
+ "DEFCONSTANT-UNEQL-NEW-VALUE" "DEFCONSTANT-UNEQL-OLD-VALUE"
+
+ ;; conditions that can be handled to reduce compiler
+ ;; verbosity
+ "COMPILER-NOTE"
+