- ;; FIXME: A note explaining this return convention, or a
- ;; symbolic name for it, would be nice. (It looks as though we
- ;; should be hand-crafting the same return sequence as would be
- ;; produced by GENERATE-RETURN-SEQUENCE, but in that case it's
- ;; not clear why we don't just jump to the end of this function
- ;; to share the return sequence there.
- (inst pop eax)
- (inst add eax 2)
- (inst jmp eax)