- (go ,label-2)
- ,label-1
- ,@code
- (,step ,@(nreverse r-steps))
- ,label-2
- (unless ,(first endlist) (go ,label-1))
- (return-from ,block (progn ,@(rest endlist))))))))))
+ (go ,label-2)
+ ,label-1
+ (tagbody ,@code)
+ (,step ,@(nreverse r-steps))
+ ,label-2
+ (unless ,(first endlist) (go ,label-1))
+ (return-from ,block (progn ,@(rest endlist))))))))))
;;; This is like DO, except it has no implicit NIL block. Each VAR is
;;; initialized in parallel to the value of the specified INIT form.
;;; This is like DO, except it has no implicit NIL block. Each VAR is
;;; initialized in parallel to the value of the specified INIT form.
(eval-when (#-sb-xc :compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
(defun symbolicate (&rest things)
(let ((name (case (length things)
(eval-when (#-sb-xc :compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
(defun symbolicate (&rest things)
(let ((name (case (length things)
;; Well, this is called early in cold-init, before
;; the type system is set up; however, now that we
;; check for bad lengths, the type system is needed
;; for calls to CONCATENATE. So we need to make sure
;; that the calls are transformed away:
;; Well, this is called early in cold-init, before
;; the type system is set up; however, now that we
;; check for bad lengths, the type system is needed
;; for calls to CONCATENATE. So we need to make sure
;; that the calls are transformed away:
- (the simple-string (string (car things)))
- (the simple-string (string (cadr things)))))
+ (the simple-base-string
+ (string (car things)))
+ (the simple-base-string
+ (string (cadr things)))))
- (the simple-string (string (car things)))
- (the simple-string (string (cadr things)))
- (the simple-string (string (caddr things)))))
+ (the simple-base-string
+ (string (car things)))
+ (the simple-base-string
+ (string (cadr things)))
+ (the simple-base-string
+ (string (caddr things)))))