- (with-unique-names (cfp)
- `(let ((,cfp (sb!kernel:current-fp)))
- (unless (and (mutex-value ,mutex)
- (sb!vm:control-stack-pointer-valid-p
- (sb!sys:int-sap
- (sb!kernel:get-lisp-obj-address (mutex-value ,mutex)))))
- ;; this punning with MAKE-LISP-OBJ depends for its safety on
- ;; the frame pointer being a lispobj-aligned integer. While
- ;; it is, then MAKE-LISP-OBJ will always return a FIXNUM, so
- ;; we're safe to do that. Should this ever change, this
- ;; MAKE-LISP-OBJ could return something that looks like a
- ;; pointer, but pointing into neverneverland, which will
- ;; confuse GC completely. -- CSR, 2003-06-03
- (get-mutex ,mutex (sb!kernel:make-lisp-obj (sb!sys:sap-int ,cfp))))
- (unwind-protect
- (locally ,@body)
- (when (sb!sys:sap= (sb!sys:int-sap
- (sb!kernel:get-lisp-obj-address
- (mutex-value ,mutex)))
- ,cfp)
- (release-mutex ,mutex)))))
+ (with-unique-names (mutex1 inner-lock-p)
+ `(let* ((,mutex1 ,mutex)
+ (,inner-lock-p (eq (mutex-value ,mutex1) *current-thread*)))
+ (unwind-protect
+ (progn
+ (unless ,inner-lock-p
+ (get-mutex ,mutex1))
+ (locally
+ ,@body))
+ (unless ,inner-lock-p
+ (release-mutex ,mutex1)))))
+ #!-sb-thread
+ `(locally ,@body))
+
+(sb!xc:defmacro with-recursive-spinlock ((spinlock) &body body)
+ #!-sb-thread
+ (declare (ignore spinlock))
+ #!+sb-thread
+ (with-unique-names (lock inner-lock-p got-it)
+ `(let* ((,lock ,spinlock)
+ (,inner-lock-p (eq (spinlock-value ,lock) *current-thread*))
+ (,got-it nil))
+ (unwind-protect
+ (when (or ,inner-lock-p (setf ,got-it (get-spinlock ,lock)))
+ (locally ,@body))
+ (when ,got-it
+ (release-spinlock ,lock)))))