- (/show0 "at head of outer LOOP in TOPLEVEL-REPL")
- ;; There should only be one TOPLEVEL restart, and it's here, so
- ;; restarting at TOPLEVEL always bounces you all the way out here.
- (with-simple-restart (toplevel
- "Restart at toplevel READ/EVAL/PRINT loop.")
- ;; We add a new ABORT restart for every debugger level, so
- ;; restarting at ABORT in a nested debugger gets you out to the
- ;; innermost enclosing debugger, and only when you're in the
- ;; outermost, unnested debugger level does restarting at ABORT
- ;; get you out to here.
- (with-simple-restart (abort
- "Reduce debugger level (leaving debugger).")
- (catch 'top-level-catcher
- (sb!unix:unix-sigsetmask 0) ; FIXME: What is this for?
- (/show0 "about to enter inner LOOP in TOPLEVEL-REPL")
- (loop ; FIXME: Do we need this inner LOOP?
- ;; FIXME: It seems bad to have GC behavior depend on scrubbing
- ;; the control stack before each interactive command. Isn't
- ;; there some way we can convince the GC to just ignore
- ;; dead areas of the control stack, so that we don't need to
- ;; rely on this half-measure?
- (scrub-control-stack)
- (unless noprint
- (fresh-line)
- (princ (if (functionp *prompt*)
- (funcall *prompt*)
- *prompt*))
- (flush-standard-output-streams))
- (let ((form (read *standard-input* nil eof-marker)))
- (if (eq form eof-marker)
- (quit)
- (let ((results
- (multiple-value-list (interactive-eval form))))
- (unless noprint
- (dolist (result results)
- (fresh-line)
- (prin1 result)))))))))))))
-
+ (/show0 "about to set up restarts in TOPLEVEL-REPL")
+ ;; There should only be one TOPLEVEL restart, and it's here, so
+ ;; restarting at TOPLEVEL always bounces you all the way out here.
+ (with-simple-restart (toplevel
+ "Restart at toplevel READ/EVAL/PRINT loop.")
+ ;; We add a new ABORT restart for every debugger level, so
+ ;; restarting at ABORT in a nested debugger gets you out to the
+ ;; innermost enclosing debugger, and only when you're in the
+ ;; outermost, unnested debugger level does restarting at ABORT
+ ;; get you out to here.
+ (with-simple-restart
+ (abort
+ "~@<Reduce debugger level (leaving debugger, returning to toplevel).~@:>")
+ (catch 'toplevel-catcher
+ #!-sunos (sb!unix:unix-sigsetmask 0) ; FIXME: What is this for?
+ ;; in the event of a control-stack-exhausted-error, we should
+ ;; have unwound enough stack by the time we get here that this
+ ;; is now possible
+ (sb!kernel::protect-control-stack-guard-page 1)
+ (repl noprint)
+ (critically-unreachable "after REPL")))))))
+
+(defun repl (noprint)
+ (/show0 "entering REPL")
+ (let ((eof-marker (cons :eof nil)))
+ (loop
+ ;; see comment preceding definition of SCRUB-CONTROL-STACK
+ (scrub-control-stack)
+ (unless noprint
+ (fresh-line)
+ (write-string "* ") ; arbitrary but customary REPL prompt
+ (flush-standard-output-streams))
+ (let ((form (read *standard-input* nil eof-marker)))
+ (cond ((eq form eof-marker)
+ (/show0 "doing QUIT for EOF in REPL")
+ (quit))
+ (t
+ (let ((results (multiple-value-list (interactive-eval form))))
+ (unless noprint
+ (dolist (result results)
+ (fresh-line)
+ (prin1 result))))))))))
+
+;;; suitable value for *DEBUGGER-HOOK* for a noninteractive Unix-y program