- ;; Each time through this loop we need to emit another instruction.
- ;; First, we check to see whether there is any instruction that
- ;; must be emitted before (i.e. must come after) the branch inst.
- ;; If so, emit it. Otherwise, just pick one of the emittable
- ;; insts. If there is nothing to do, then emit a nop.
- ;; ### Note: despite the fact that this is a loop, it really won't
- ;; work for repetitions other then zero and one. For example, if
- ;; the branch has two dependents and one of them dpends on the
- ;; other, then the stuff that grabs a dependent could easily
- ;; grab the wrong one. But I don't feel like fixing this because
- ;; it doesn't matter for any of the architectures we are using
- ;; or plan on using.
+ ;; Each time through this loop we need to emit another
+ ;; instruction. First, we check to see whether there is
+ ;; any instruction that must be emitted before (i.e. must
+ ;; come after) the branch inst. If so, emit it. Otherwise,
+ ;; just pick one of the emittable insts. If there is
+ ;; nothing to do, then emit a nop. ### Note: despite the
+ ;; fact that this is a loop, it really won't work for
+ ;; repetitions other then zero and one. For example, if
+p ;; the branch has two dependents and one of them dpends on
+ ;; the other, then the stuff that grabs a dependent could
+ ;; easily grab the wrong one. But I don't feel like fixing
+ ;; this because it doesn't matter for any of the
+ ;; architectures we are using or plan on using.