-;;; The only tricky thing is handling constant-pool references to functions.
-;;; If we have already dumped the function, then we just push the code pointer.
-;;; Otherwise, we must create back-patching information so that the constant
-;;; will be set when the function is eventually dumped. This is a bit awkward,
-;;; since we don't have the handle for the code object being dumped while we
-;;; are dumping its constants.
+;;; The only tricky thing is handling constant-pool references to
+;;; functions. If we have already dumped the function, then we just
+;;; push the code pointer. Otherwise, we must create back-patching
+;;; information so that the constant will be set when the function is
+;;; eventually dumped. This is a bit awkward, since we don't have the
+;;; handle for the code object being dumped while we are dumping its
+;;; constants.