+;;; This and the corresponding -SET transform work equally well on non-simple
+;;; arrays, but after benchmarking (on x86), Nikodemus didn't find any cases
+;;; where it actually helped with non-simple arrays -- to the contrary, it
+;;; only made for bigger and up 1o 100% slower code.
+(deftransform hairy-data-vector-ref ((array index) (simple-array t) *)