- (let ((*print-level* *compiler-error-print-level*)
- (*print-length* *compiler-error-print-length*)
- (*print-lines* *compiler-error-print-lines*)
- (*print-pretty* pretty))
- (if pretty
- (format nil "~<~@; ~S~:>" (list form))
- (prin1-to-string form))))
+ (with-standard-io-syntax
+ (let ((*print-readably* nil)
+ (*print-pretty* pretty)
+ (*print-level* *compiler-error-print-level*)
+ (*print-length* *compiler-error-print-length*)
+ (*print-lines* *compiler-error-print-lines*))
+ (if pretty
+ (format nil "~<~@; ~S~:>" (list form))
+ (prin1-to-string form)))))
+
+;;; shorthand for a repeated idiom in creating debug names
+;;;
+;;; the problem, part I: We want to create debug names that look like
+;;; "&MORE processor for <something>" where <something> might be
+;;; either a source-name value (typically a symbol) or a non-symbol
+;;; debug-name value (typically a string). It's awkward to handle this
+;;; with FORMAT because we'd like to splice a source-name value using
+;;; "~S" (to get package qualifiers) but a debug-name value using "~A"
+;;; (to avoid irrelevant quotes at string splice boundaries).
+;;;
+;;; the problem, part II: The <something> is represented as a pair
+;;; of values, SOURCE-NAME and DEBUG-NAME, where SOURCE-NAME is used
+;;; if it's not .ANONYMOUS. (This is parallel to the way that ordinarily
+;;; we don't use a value if it's NIL, instead defaulting it. But we
+;;; can't safely/comfortably use NIL for that in this context, since
+;;; the app programmer can use NIL as a name, so we use the private
+;;; symbol .ANONYMOUS. instead.)
+;;;
+;;; the solution: Use this function to convert whatever it is to a
+;;; string, which FORMAT can then splice using "~A".
+(defun as-debug-name (source-name debug-name)
+ (if (eql source-name '.anonymous.)
+ debug-name
+ (debug-namify "~S" source-name)))