- ;; FIXME: I'm pretty sure the INHIBIT-WARNINGS test below
- ;; isn't a good idea; we should have INHIBIT-WARNINGS
- ;; affect compiler notes, not STYLE-WARNINGs. And I'm not
- ;; sure what the BOUNDP '*LEXENV* test above is for; it's
- ;; likely a good idea, but it probably deserves an
- ;; explanatory comment.
- (policy *lexenv* (= inhibit-warnings 3)))
+ (or
+ ;; FIXME: I'm pretty sure the INHIBIT-WARNINGS test below
+ ;; isn't a good idea; we should have INHIBIT-WARNINGS
+ ;; affect compiler notes, not STYLE-WARNINGs. And I'm not
+ ;; sure what the BOUNDP '*LEXENV* test above is for; it's
+ ;; likely a good idea, but it probably deserves an
+ ;; explanatory comment.
+ (policy *lexenv* (= inhibit-warnings 3))
+ ;; KLUDGE: weird decoupling between here and where we're
+ ;; going to signal the condition. I don't think we can
+ ;; rewrite this using SIGNAL and RESTART-CASE (to take
+ ;; advantage of the (SATISFIES HANDLE-CONDITION-P)
+ ;; handler, because if that doesn't handle it the ordinary
+ ;; compiler handlers will trigger.
+ (typep
+ (ecase kind
+ (:variable (make-condition 'warning))
+ ((:function :type) (make-condition 'style-warning)))
+ (car
+ (rassoc 'muffle-warning
+ (lexenv-handled-conditions *lexenv*))))))