+ ;;
+ ;; A functional that is already inline-expanded in this componsne definitely
+ ;; deserves let-conversion -- and in case of main entry points for inline
+ ;; expanded optional dispatch, the main-etry isn't explicitly marked :INLINE
+ ;; even if the function really is.
+ (when (and (leaf-has-source-name-p clambda)
+ (not (functional-inline-expanded clambda)))