- (let ((*initfunctions* ())
- (*readers* ()) ;Truly a crock, but we got
- (*writers* ())) ;to have it to live nicely.
- (declare (special *initfunctions* *readers* *writers*))
- (let ((canonical-slots
- (mapcar #'(lambda (spec)
- (canonicalize-slot-specification name spec))
- slots))
- (other-initargs
- (mapcar #'(lambda (option)
- (canonicalize-defclass-option name option))
- options))
- (defstruct-p (and (eq *boot-state* 'complete)
- (let ((mclass (find-class metaclass nil)))
- (and mclass
- (*subtypep
- mclass
- *the-class-structure-class*))))))
- (let ((defclass-form
- `(progn
- ,@(mapcar (lambda (x)
- `(declaim (ftype (function (t) t) ,x)))
- *readers*)
- ,@(mapcar (lambda (x)
- `(declaim (ftype (function (t t) t) ,x)))
- *writers*)
- (let ,(mapcar #'cdr *initfunctions*)
- (load-defclass ',name
- ',metaclass
- ',supers
- (list ,@canonical-slots)
- (list ,@(apply #'append
- (when defstruct-p
- '(:from-defclass-p t))
- other-initargs)))))))
- ;; FIXME: The way that we do things like (EVAL DEFCLASS-FORM)
- ;; here is un-ANSI-Common-Lisp-y and leads to problems
- ;; (like DEFUN for the type predicate being called more than
- ;; once when we do DEFCLASS at the interpreter prompt),
- ;; causing bogus style warnings. It would be better to
- ;; rewrite this so that the macroexpansion looks like e.g.
- ;; (PROGN
- ;; (EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL :LOAD-TOPLEVEL :EXECUTE)
- ;; (FROB1 ..))
- ;; (EVAL-WHEN (:LOAD-TOPLEVEL :EXECUTE)
- ;; (FROB2 ..)))
- (if defstruct-p
- (progn
- (eval defclass-form) ; Define the class now, so that..
- `(progn ; ..the defstruct can be compiled.
- ,(class-defstruct-form (find-class name))
- ,defclass-form))
- (progn
- (when (eq *boot-state* 'complete)
- ;; FIXME: MNA (on sbcl-devel 2001-05-30) reported
- ;; (if I understand correctly -- WHN) that this call
- ;; is directly responsible for defining
- ;; class-predicates which always return
- ;; CONSTANTLY-NIL in the compile-time environment,
- ;; and is indirectly responsible for bogus warnings
- ;; about redefinitions when making definitions in
- ;; the interpreter. I didn't like his fix (deleting
- ;; the call) since I think the type system *should*
- ;; be informed about class definitions here. And I'm
- ;; not eager to look too deeply into this sort of
- ;; done-too-many-times-in-the-interpreter problem
- ;; right now, since it should be easier to make a
- ;; clean fix when EVAL-WHEN is made more ANSI (as
- ;; per the IR1 section in the BUGS file). But
- ;; at some point this should be cleaned up.
- (inform-type-system-about-std-class name))
- defclass-form)))))))
+ (let ((*initfunctions* ())
+ (*readers* ()) ;Truly a crock, but we got
+ (*writers* ())) ;to have it to live nicely.
+ (declare (special *initfunctions* *readers* *writers*))
+ (let ((canonical-slots
+ (mapcar #'(lambda (spec)
+ (canonicalize-slot-specification name spec))
+ slots))
+ (other-initargs
+ (mapcar #'(lambda (option)
+ (canonicalize-defclass-option name option))
+ options))
+ ;; DEFSTRUCT-P should be true, if the class is defined with a
+ ;; metaclass STRUCTURE-CLASS, such that a DEFSTRUCT is compiled
+ ;; for the class.
+ (defstruct-p (and (eq *boot-state* 'complete)
+ (let ((mclass (find-class metaclass nil)))
+ (and mclass
+ (*subtypep
+ mclass
+ *the-class-structure-class*))))))
+ (let ((defclass-form
+ `(progn
+ ,@(mapcar (lambda (x)
+ `(declaim (ftype (function (t) t) ,x)))
+ *readers*)
+ ,@(mapcar (lambda (x)
+ `(declaim (ftype (function (t t) t) ,x)))
+ *writers*)
+ (let ,(mapcar #'cdr *initfunctions*)
+ (load-defclass ',name
+ ',metaclass
+ ',supers
+ (list ,@canonical-slots)
+ (list ,@(apply #'append
+ (when defstruct-p
+ '(:from-defclass-p t))
+ other-initargs)))))))
+ (if defstruct-p
+ (let* ((include (or (and supers
+ (fix-super (car supers)))
+ (and (not (eq name 'structure-object))
+ *the-class-structure-object*)))
+ (defstruct-form (make-structure-class-defstruct-form
+ name slots include)))
+ `(progn
+ (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
+ ,defstruct-form) ; really compile the defstruct-form
+ (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
+ ,defclass-form)))
+ `(progn
+ ;; By telling the type system at compile time about
+ ;; the existence of a class named NAME, we can avoid
+ ;; various bogus warnings about "type isn't defined yet".
+ ,(when (and
+ ;; But it's not so important to get rid of
+ ;; "not defined yet" warnings during
+ ;; bootstrapping, and machinery like
+ ;; INFORM-TYPE-SYSTEM-ABOUT-STD-CLASS
+ ;; mightn't be defined yet. So punt then.
+ (eq *boot-state* 'complete)
+ ;; And although we know enough about
+ ;; STANDARD-CLASS, and ANSI imposes enough
+ ;; restrictions on the user overloading its
+ ;; methods, that (1) we can shortcut the
+ ;; method dispatch and do an ordinary
+ ;; function call, and (2) be sure we're getting
+ ;; it right even when we do it at compile
+ ;; time; we don't in general know how to do
+ ;; that for other classes. So punt then too.
+ (eq metaclass 'standard-class))
+ `(eval-when (:compile-toplevel)
+ ;; we only need :COMPILE-TOPLEVEL here, because this
+ ;; should happen in the compile-time environment
+ ;; only.
+ ;; Later, INFORM-TYPE-SYSTEM-ABOUT-STD-CLASS is
+ ;; called by way of LOAD-DEFCLASS (calling
+ ;; ENSURE-CLASS-USING-CLASS) to establish the 'real'
+ ;; type predicate.
+ (inform-type-system-about-std-class ',name)))
+ ,defclass-form))))))))