- (let* ((include (or (and supers
- (fix-super (car supers)))
- (and (not (eq name 'structure-object))
- *the-class-structure-object*)))
- (defstruct-form (make-structure-class-defstruct-form
- name slots include)))
- `(progn
- (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
- ,defstruct-form) ; really compile the defstruct-form
- (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
- ,defclass-form)))
+ (progn
+ ;; FIXME: (YUK!) Why do we do this? Because in order
+ ;; to make the defstruct form, we need to know what
+ ;; the accessors for the slots are, so we need
+ ;; already to have hooked into the CLOS machinery.
+ ;;
+ ;; There may be a better way to do this: it would
+ ;; involve knowing enough about PCL to ask "what
+ ;; will my slot names and accessors be"; failing
+ ;; this, we currently just evaluate the whole
+ ;; kaboodle, and then use CLASS-DIRECT-SLOTS. --
+ ;; CSR, 2002-06-07
+ (eval defclass-form)
+ (let* ((include (or (and supers
+ (fix-super (car supers)))
+ (and (not (eq name 'structure-object))
+ *the-class-structure-object*)))
+ (defstruct-form (make-structure-class-defstruct-form
+ name (class-direct-slots (find-class name)) include)))
+ `(progn
+ (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
+ ,defstruct-form) ; really compile the defstruct-form
+ (eval-when (:compile-toplevel :load-toplevel :execute)
+ ,defclass-form))))