+ (funcall (lambda ()
+ (declare (notinline logxor))
+ (min (logxor 0 0 0 286142502))))))
+
+;; Small bugs in LOGCOUNT can still allow SBCL to be built and thus go
+;; unnoticed, so check more thoroughly here.
+(with-test (:name :logcount)
+ (flet ((test (x n)
+ (unless (= (logcount x) n)
+ (error "logcount failure for ~a" x))))
+ ;; Test with some patterns with well known number of ones/zeroes ...
+ (dotimes (i 128)
+ (let ((x (ash 1 i)))
+ (test x 1)
+ (test (- x) i)
+ (test (1- x) i)))
+ ;; ... and with some random integers of varying length.
+ (flet ((test-logcount (x)
+ (declare (type integer x))
+ (do ((result 0 (1+ result))
+ (x (if (minusp x)
+ (lognot x)
+ x)
+ (logand x (1- x))))
+ ((zerop x) result))))
+ (dotimes (i 200)
+ (let ((x (random (ash 1 i))))
+ (test x (test-logcount x))
+ (test (- x) (test-logcount (- x))))))))
+
+;; 1.0 had a broken ATANH on win32
+(with-test (:name :atanh)
+ (assert (= (atanh 0.9d0) 1.4722194895832204d0)))
+