+
+;;; bug reported and fixed by Matthias Hoelzl sbcl-devel 2002-05-13
+(defmacro foo-2002-05-13 () ''x)
+(eval '(foo-2002-05-13))
+(compile 'foo-2002-05-13)
+(foo-2002-05-13) ; (The bug caused UNDEFINED-FUNCTION to be signalled here.)
+
+;;; floating point pain on the PPC.
+;;;
+;;; This test case used to fail to compile on most powerpcs prior to
+;;; sbcl-0.7.4.2x, as floating point traps were being incorrectly
+;;; masked.
+(defun floating-point-pain (x)
+ (declare (single-float x))
+ (log x))
+
+;;; bug found and fixed ca. sbcl-0.7.5.12: The INTERSECTION-TYPE
+;;; here satisfies "is a subtype of ARRAY-TYPE", but can't be
+;;; accessed with ARRAY-TYPE accessors like
+;;; ARRAY-TYPE-SPECIALIZED-ELEMENT-TYPE, so ARRAY-related
+;;; DEFTRANSFORMs died with TYPE-ERROR at compile time when
+;;; compiling the DEFUN here.
+(defun stupid-input-to-smart-array-deftransforms-0-7-5-12 (v)
+ (declare (type (and simple-vector fwd-type-ref) v))
+ (aref v 0))
+
+;;; Ca. sbcl-0.7.5.15 the compiler would fail an internal consistency
+;;; check on this code because it expected all calls to %INSTANCE-REF
+;;; to be transformed away, but its expectations were dashed by perverse
+;;; code containing app programmer errors like this.
+(defstruct something-known-to-be-a-struct x y)
+(multiple-value-bind (fun warnings-p failure-p)
+ (compile nil
+ '(lambda ()
+ (labels ((a1 (a2 a3)
+ (cond (t (a4 a2 a3))))
+ (a4 (a2 a3 a5 a6)
+ (declare (type (or simple-vector null) a5 a6))
+ (something-known-to-be-a-struct-x a5))
+ (a8 (a2 a3)
+ (a9 #'a1 a10 a2 a3))
+ (a11 (a2 a3)
+ (cond ((and (funcall a12 a2)
+ (funcall a12 a3))
+ (funcall a13 a2 a3))
+ (t
+ (when a14
+ (let ((a15 (a1 a2 a3)))
+ ))
+ a16))))
+ (values #'a17 #'a11))))
+ ;; Python sees the structure accessor on the known-not-to-be-a-struct
+ ;; A5 value and is very, very disappointed in you. (But it doesn't
+ ;; signal BUG any more.)
+ (assert failure-p))