+
+;;; size mismatch: #<SB-VM::EA :DWORD base=#<SB-C:TN t1[RDX]> disp=1> is a :DWORD and #<SB-C:TN t2[RAX]> is a :QWORD. on x86-64
+(compile nil '(lambda ()
+ (let ((x (make-array '(1) :element-type '(signed-byte 32))))
+ (setf (aref x 0) 1))))
+
+;;; step instrumentation confusing the compiler, reported by Faré
+(handler-bind ((warning #'error))
+ (compile nil '(lambda ()
+ (declare (optimize (debug 2))) ; not debug 3!
+ (let ((val "foobar"))
+ (map-into (make-array (list (length val))
+ :element-type '(unsigned-byte 8))
+ #'char-code val)))))
+
+;;; overconfident primitive type computation leading to bogus type
+;;; checking.
+(let* ((form1 '(lambda (x)
+ (declare (type (and condition function) x))
+ x))
+ (fun1 (compile nil form1))
+ (form2 '(lambda (x)
+ (declare (type (and standard-object function) x))
+ x))
+ (fun2 (compile nil form2)))
+ (assert (raises-error? (funcall fun1 (make-condition 'error))))
+ (assert (raises-error? (funcall fun1 fun1)))
+ (assert (raises-error? (funcall fun2 fun2)))
+ (assert (eq (funcall fun2 #'print-object) #'print-object)))
+
+;;; LET* + VALUES declaration: while the declaration is a non-standard
+;;; and possibly a non-conforming extension, as long as we do support
+;;; it, we might as well get it right.
+;;;
+;;; Bug reported by Kaersten Poeck on sbcl-devel 20061023.
+(compile nil '(lambda () (let* () (declare (values list)))))