+
+(with-test (:name :log-int/double-accuracy)
+ ;; we used to use single precision for intermediate results
+ (assert (eql 2567.6046442221327d0
+ (log (loop for n from 1 to 1000 for f = 1 then (* f n)
+ finally (return f))
+ 10d0)))
+ ;; both ways
+ (assert (eql (log 123123123.0d0 10) (log 123123123 10.0d0))))
+
+(with-test (:name :log-base-zero-return-type)
+ (assert (eql 0.0f0 (log 123 (eval 0))))
+ (assert (eql 0.0d0 (log 123.0d0 (eval 0))))
+ (assert (eql 0.0d0 (log 123 (eval 0.0d0))))
+ (let ((f (compile nil '(lambda (x y)
+ (declare (optimize speed))
+ (etypecase x
+ (single-float
+ (etypecase y
+ (single-float (log x y))
+ (double-float (log x y))))
+ (double-float
+ (etypecase y
+ (single-float (log x y))
+ (double-float (log x y)))))))))
+ (assert (eql 0.0f0 (funcall f 123.0 0.0)))
+ (assert (eql 0.0d0 (funcall f 123.0d0 0.0)))
+ (assert (eql 0.0d0 (funcall f 123.0d0 0.0d0)))
+ (assert (eql 0.0d0 (funcall f 123.0 0.0d0)))))
+
+;; Bug reported by Eric Marsden on July 15 2009. The compiler
+;; used not to constant fold calls with arguments of type
+;; (EQL foo).
+(with-test (:name :eql-type-constant-fold)
+ (assert (equal '(FUNCTION (T) (VALUES (MEMBER T) &OPTIONAL))
+ (sb-kernel:%simple-fun-type
+ (compile nil `(lambda (x)
+ (eql #c(1.0 2.0)
+ (the (eql #c(1.0 2.0))
+ x))))))))