+ do (let ((result (apply #'merge-pathnames params)))
+ (macrolet ((frob (op)
+ `(assert (equal (,op result) (,op expected-result)))))
+ (frob pathname-host)
+ (frob pathname-directory)
+ (frob pathname-name)
+ (frob pathname-type))))
+\f
+;;; host-namestring testing
+(assert (string=
+ (namestring (parse-namestring "/foo" (host-namestring #p"/bar")))
+ "/foo"))
+(assert (string=
+ (namestring (parse-namestring "FOO" (host-namestring #p"SCRATCH:BAR")))
+ "SCRATCH:FOO"))
+(assert (raises-error?
+ (setf (logical-pathname-translations "")
+ (list '("**;*.*.*" "/**/*.*")))))
+\f
+;;; Bug 200: translate-logical-pathname is according to the spec supposed
+;;; not to give errors if asked to translate a namestring for a valid
+;;; physical pathname. Failed in 0.7.7.28 and before
+(assert (string= (namestring (translate-logical-pathname "/")) "/"))
+
+\f
+;;; Not strictly pathname logic testing, but until sbcl-0.7.6.19 we
+;;; had difficulty with non-FILE-STREAM stream arguments to pathname
+;;; functions (they would cause memory protection errors). Make sure
+;;; that those errors are gone:
+(assert (raises-error? (pathname (make-string-input-stream "FOO"))
+ type-error))
+(assert (raises-error? (merge-pathnames (make-string-output-stream))
+ type-error))
+\f
+;;; ensure read/print consistency (or print-not-readable-error) on
+;;; pathnames:
+(let ((pathnames (list
+ (make-pathname :name "foo" :type "txt" :version :newest)
+ (make-pathname :name "foo" :type "txt" :version 1)
+ (make-pathname :name "foo" :type ".txt")
+ (make-pathname :name "foo." :type "txt")
+ (parse-namestring "SCRATCH:FOO.TXT.1")
+ (parse-namestring "SCRATCH:FOO.TXT.NEWEST")
+ (parse-namestring "SCRATCH:FOO.TXT"))))
+ (dolist (p pathnames)
+ (print p)
+ (handler-case
+ (let ((*print-readably* t))
+ (assert (equal (read-from-string (format nil "~S" p)) p)))
+ (print-not-readable () nil))))
+\f
+;;; BUG 330: "PARSE-NAMESTRING should accept namestrings as the
+;;; default argument" ...and streams as well
+(assert (equal (parse-namestring "foo" nil "/")
+ (parse-namestring "foo" nil #P"/")))
+(let ((test "parse-namestring-test.tmp"))
+ (unwind-protect
+ (with-open-file (f test :direction :output)
+ ;; FIXME: This test is a bit flaky, since we only check that
+ ;; no error is signalled. The dilemma here is "what is the
+ ;; correct result when defaults is a _file_, not a
+ ;; directory". Currently (0.8.10.73) we get #P"foo" here (as
+ ;; opposed to eg. #P"/path/to/current/foo"), which is
+ ;; possibly mildly surprising but probably conformant.
+ (assert (parse-namestring "foo" nil f)))
+ (when (probe-file test)
+ (delete-file test))))
+\f
+;;; ENOUGH-NAMESTRING should probably not fail when the namestring in
+;;; question has a :RELATIVE pathname.
+(assert (equal (enough-namestring #p"foo" #p"./") "foo"))
+\f
+;;; bug reported by Artem V. Andreev: :WILD not handled in unparsing
+;;; directory lists.
+(assert (equal (namestring #p"/tmp/*/") "/tmp/*/"))
+
+;;; Printing of pathnames; see CLHS 22.1.3.1. This section was started
+;;; to confirm that pathnames are printed as their namestrings under
+;;; :escape nil :readably nil.
+(loop for (pathname expected . vars) in
+ `((#p"/foo" "#P\"/foo\"")
+ (#p"/foo" "#P\"/foo\"" :readably nil)
+ (#p"/foo" "#P\"/foo\"" :escape nil)
+ (#p"/foo" "/foo" :readably nil :escape nil))
+ for actual = (with-standard-io-syntax
+ (apply #'write-to-string pathname vars))
+ do (assert (string= expected actual)
+ ()
+ "~S should be ~S, was ~S"
+ (list* 'write-to-string pathname vars)
+ expected
+ actual))
+\f
+;;; we got (truename "/") wrong for about 6 months. Check that it's
+;;; still right.
+(let ((pathname (truename "/")))
+ (assert (equalp pathname #p"/"))
+ (assert (equal (pathname-directory pathname) '(:absolute))))
+\f
+;;; we failed to unparse logical pathnames with :NAME :WILD :TYPE NIL.
+;;; (Reported by Pascal Bourguignon.
+(let ((pathname (make-pathname :host "SYS" :directory '(:absolute :wild-inferiors)
+ :name :wild :type nil)))
+ (assert (string= (namestring pathname) "SYS:**;*"))
+ (assert (string= (write-to-string pathname :readably t) "#P\"SYS:**;*\"")))
+\f
+;;; reported by James Y Knight on sbcl-devel 2006-05-17
+(let ((p1 (make-pathname :directory '(:relative "bar")))
+ (p2 (make-pathname :directory '(:relative :back "foo"))))
+ (assert (equal (merge-pathnames p1 p2)
+ (make-pathname :directory '(:relative :back "foo" "bar")))))
+
+;;; construct native namestrings even if the directory is empty (means
+;;; that same as if (:relative))
+(assert (equal (sb-ext:native-namestring (make-pathname :directory '(:relative)
+ :name "foo"
+ :type "txt"))
+ (sb-ext:native-namestring (let ((p (make-pathname :directory nil
+ :name "foo"
+ :type "txt")))
+ (assert (not (pathname-directory p)))
+ p))))
+
+;;; reported by Richard Kreuter: PATHNAME and MERGE-PATHNAMES used to
+;;; be unsafely-flushable. Since they are known to return non-nil values
+;;; only, the test-node of the IF is flushed, and since the function
+;;; is unsafely-flushable, out it goes, and bad pathname designators
+;;; breeze through.
+;;;
+;;; These tests rely on using a stream that appears as a file-stream
+;;; but isn't a valid pathname-designator.
+(assert (eq :false
+ (if (ignore-errors (pathname sb-sys::*tty*)) :true :false)))
+(assert (eq :false
+ (if (ignore-errors (merge-pathnames sb-sys::*tty*)) :true :false)))
+
+;;; This used to return "quux/bar.lisp"
+(assert (equal #p"quux/bar.fasl"
+ (let ((*default-pathname-defaults* #p"quux/"))
+ (compile-file-pathname "foo.lisp" :output-file "bar"))))
+(assert (equal #p"quux/bar.fasl"
+ (let ((*default-pathname-defaults* #p"quux/"))
+ (compile-file-pathname "bar.lisp"))))
+\f
+(enough-namestring #p".a*")