+ 0.0f0))
+
+;;; bug 260a
+(assert-t-t
+ (let* ((s (gensym))
+ (t1 (sb-kernel:specifier-type s)))
+ (eval `(defstruct ,s))
+ (sb-kernel:type= t1 (sb-kernel:specifier-type s))))
+
+;;; bug found by PFD's random subtypep tester
+(let ((t1 '(cons rational (cons (not rational) (cons integer t))))
+ (t2 '(not (cons (integer 0 1) (cons single-float long-float)))))
+ (assert-t-t (subtypep t1 t2))
+ (assert-nil-t (subtypep t2 t1))
+ (assert-t-t (subtypep `(not ,t2) `(not ,t1)))
+ (assert-nil-t (subtypep `(not ,t1) `(not ,t2))))
+\f
+;;; not easily visible to user code, but this used to be very
+;;; confusing.
+(with-test (:name (:ctor :typep-function))
+ (assert (eval '(typep (sb-pcl::ensure-ctor
+ (list 'sb-pcl::ctor (gensym)) nil nil nil)
+ 'function))))
+(with-test (:name (:ctor :functionp))
+ (assert (functionp (sb-pcl::ensure-ctor
+ (list 'sb-pcl::ctor (gensym)) nil nil nil))))
+;;; some new (2008-10-03) ways of going wrong...
+(with-test (:name (:ctor-allocate-instance :typep-function))
+ (assert (eval '(typep (allocate-instance (find-class 'sb-pcl::ctor))
+ 'function))))
+(with-test (:name (:ctor-allocate-instance :functionp))
+ (assert (functionp (allocate-instance (find-class 'sb-pcl::ctor)))))
+\f
+;;; from PFD ansi-tests
+(let ((t1 '(cons (cons (cons (real -744833699 -744833699) cons)
+ (integer -234496 215373))
+ integer))
+ (t2 '(cons (cons (cons integer integer)
+ (integer -234496 215373))
+ t)))
+ (assert (null (values (subtypep `(not ,t2) `(not ,t1))))))
+\f
+(defstruct misc-629a)
+(defclass misc-629b () ())
+(defclass misc-629c () () (:metaclass sb-mop:funcallable-standard-class))
+
+(assert (typep (make-misc-629a) 'sb-kernel:instance))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep `(member ,(make-misc-629a)) 'sb-kernel:instance))
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep `(and (member ,(make-misc-629a)) sb-kernel:instance)
+ nil))
+(let ((misc-629a (make-misc-629a)))
+ (assert-t-t (subtypep `(member ,misc-629a)
+ `(and (member ,misc-629a) sb-kernel:instance)))
+ (assert-t-t (subtypep `(and (member ,misc-629a)
+ sb-kernel:funcallable-instance)
+ nil)))
+
+(assert (typep (make-instance 'misc-629b) 'sb-kernel:instance))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep `(member ,(make-instance 'misc-629b))
+ 'sb-kernel:instance))
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep `(and (member ,(make-instance 'misc-629b))
+ sb-kernel:instance)
+ nil))
+(let ((misc-629b (make-instance 'misc-629b)))
+ (assert-t-t (subtypep `(member ,misc-629b)
+ `(and (member ,misc-629b) sb-kernel:instance)))
+ (assert-t-t (subtypep `(and (member ,misc-629b)
+ sb-kernel:funcallable-instance)
+ nil)))
+
+(assert (typep (make-instance 'misc-629c) 'sb-kernel:funcallable-instance))
+(assert-t-t (subtypep `(member ,(make-instance 'misc-629c))
+ 'sb-kernel:funcallable-instance))
+(assert-nil-t (subtypep `(and (member ,(make-instance 'misc-629c))
+ sb-kernel:funcallable-instance)
+ nil))
+(let ((misc-629c (make-instance 'misc-629c)))
+ (assert-t-t (subtypep `(member ,misc-629c)
+ `(and (member ,misc-629c)
+ sb-kernel:funcallable-instance)))
+ (assert-t-t (subtypep `(and (member ,misc-629c)
+ sb-kernel:instance)
+ nil)))
+\f
+;;; this was broken during the FINALIZE-INHERITANCE rearrangement; the
+;;; MAKE-INSTANCE finalizes the superclass, thus invalidating the
+;;; subclass, so SUBTYPEP must be prepared to deal with
+(defclass ansi-tests-defclass1 () ())
+(defclass ansi-tests-defclass3 (ansi-tests-defclass1) ())
+(make-instance 'ansi-tests-defclass1)
+(assert-t-t (subtypep 'ansi-tests-defclass3 'standard-object))
+\f
+;;; so was this
+(let ((class (eval '(defclass to-be-type-ofed () ()))))
+ (setf (find-class 'to-be-type-ofed) nil)
+ (assert (eq (type-of (make-instance class)) class)))