0.9.5.72:

[sbcl.git] / BUGS

diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS
index a9bd148..1c750b4 100644 (file)
--- a/BUGS
+++ b/BUGS
@@ -94,6 +94,9 @@ WORKAROUND:
   And as long as we're wishing, it would be awfully nice if INSPECT could
   also report on closures, telling about the values of the bound variables.
 
+  Currently INSPECT and DESCRIBE do show the values, but showing the
+  names of the bindings would be even nicer.
+
 35:
   The compiler assumes that any time a function of declared FTYPE
   doesn't signal an error, its arguments were of the declared type.
@@ -2107,3 +2110,15 @@ WORKAROUND:
   12:19 < Xophe> it's the same problem as we had with compiler-error conditions
   12:19 < Xophe> the thing that's signalled up and down the stack is a subtype of
                   ERROR, where it probably shouldn't be
+
+388:
+  (found by Dmitry Bogomolov)
+
+    (defclass foo () ((x :type (unsigned-byte 8))))
+    (defclass bar () ((x :type symbol)))
+    (defclass baz (foo bar) ())
+
+  causes error
+
+    SB-PCL::SPECIALIZER-APPLICABLE-USING-TYPE-P cannot handle the second argument
+    (UNSIGNED-BYTE 8).