believers in ANSI compatibility and all, (1) there's no obvious
simple way to do it (short of disabling all warnings for type
mismatches everywhere), and (2) there's a good portable
- workaround. ANSI justifies this specification by saying
+ workaround, and (3) by their own reasoning, it looks as though
+ ANSI may have gotten it wrong. ANSI justifies this specification
+ by saying
The restriction against issuing a warning for type mismatches
between a slot-initform and the corresponding slot's :TYPE
option is necessary because a slot-initform must be specified
in order to specify slot options; in some cases, no suitable
default may exist.
- In SBCL, as in CMU CL (or, for that matter, any compiler which
- really understands Common Lisp types) a suitable default does
- exist, in all cases, because the compiler understands the concept
- of functions which never return (i.e. has return type NIL, e.g.
- ERROR). Thus, as a portable workaround, you can use a call to
- some known-never-to-return function as the default. E.g.
+ However, in SBCL (as in CMU CL or, for that matter, any compiler
+ which really understands Common Lisp types) a suitable default
+ does exist, in all cases, because the compiler understands the
+ concept of functions which never return (i.e. has return type NIL).
+ Thus, as a portable workaround, you can use a call to some
+ known-never-to-return function as the default. E.g.
(DEFSTRUCT FOO
(BAR (ERROR "missing :BAR argument")
:TYPE SOME-TYPE-TOO-HAIRY-TO-CONSTRUCT-AN-INSTANCE-OF))
or
- (DECLAIM (FTYPE () NIL) MISSING-ARG)
+ (DECLAIM (FTYPE (FUNCTION () NIL) MISSING-ARG))
(DEFUN REQUIRED-ARG () ; workaround for SBCL non-ANSI slot init typing
(ERROR "missing required argument"))
(DEFSTRUCT FOO
(BAR (REQUIRED-ARG) :TYPE TRICKY-TYPE-OF-SOME-SORT)
(BLETCH (REQUIRED-ARG) :TYPE TRICKY-TYPE-OF-SOME-SORT)
(N-REFS-SO-FAR 0 :TYPE (INTEGER 0)))
- Such code will compile without complaint and work correctly either
- on SBCL or on a completely compliant Common Lisp system.
+ Such code should compile without complaint and work correctly either
+ on SBCL or on any other completely compliant Common Lisp system.
6:
bogus warnings about undefined functions for magic functions like
to really grok function declarations.
7:
- The "byte compiling top-level form:" output ought to be condensed.
+ The "compiling top-level form:" output ought to be condensed.
Perhaps any number of such consecutive lines ought to turn into a
- single "byte compiling top-level forms:" line.
+ single "compiling top-level forms:" line.
10:
The way that the compiler munges types with arguments together
munge12egnum
NIL
-23:
- When too many files are opened, OPEN will fail with an
- uninformative error message
- error in function OPEN: error opening #P"/tmp/foo.lisp": NIL
- instead of saying that too many files are open.
-
-26:
- reported by Sam Steingold on the cmucl-imp mailing list 12 May 2000:
- Also, there is another bug: `array-displacement' should return an
- array or nil as first value (as per ANSI CL), while CMUCL declares
- it as returning an array as first value always.
- (Actually, I think the old CMU CL version in SBCL never returns NIL,
- i.e. it's not just a declaration problem, but the definition doesn't
- behave ANSIly.)
-
27:
Sometimes (SB-EXT:QUIT) fails with
Argh! maximum interrupt nesting depth (4096) exceeded, exiting
E.g. compiling and loading
(DECLAIM (OPTIMIZE (SAFETY 3)))
(DEFUN FACTORIAL (X) (GAMMA (1+ X)))
- (DECLAIM (FTYPE (FUNCTION (UNSIGNED-BYTE) FACTORIAL)))
+ (DEFUN GAMMA (X) X)
+ (DECLAIM (FTYPE (FUNCTION (UNSIGNED-BYTE)) FACTORIAL))
(DEFUN FOO (X)
(COND ((> (FACTORIAL X) 1.0E6)
(FORMAT T "too big~%"))
that arbitrary functions check their argument types. (It might
make sense to add another flag (CHECKED?) to DEFKNOWN to
identify functions which *do* check their argument types.)
+ (Also, verify that the compiler handles declared function
+ return types as assertions.)
38:
DEFMETHOD doesn't check the syntax of &REST argument lists properly,
MERGE also have the same problem.
c: (COERCE 'AND 'FUNCTION) returns something related to
(MACRO-FUNCTION 'AND), but ANSI says it should raise an error.
- d: ELT signals SIMPLE-ERROR if its index argument
- isn't a valid index for its sequence argument, but should
- signal TYPE-ERROR instead.
- e: FILE-LENGTH is supposed to signal a type error when its
- argument is not a stream associated with a file, but doesn't.
f: (FLOAT-RADIX 2/3) should signal an error instead of
returning 2.
g: (LOAD "*.lsp") should signal FILE-ERROR.
c: SYMBOL-MACROLET should signal PROGRAM-ERROR if something
it binds is declared SPECIAL inside.
-49:
- LOOP bugs reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
- a: (LOOP WITH (A B) DO (PRINT 1)) is a syntax error according to
- the definition of WITH clauses given in the ANSI spec, but
- compiles and runs happily in SBCL.
- b: a messy one involving package iteration:
-interpreted Form: (LET ((PACKAGE (MAKE-PACKAGE "LOOP-TEST"))) (INTERN "blah" PACKAGE) (LET ((BLAH2 (INTERN "blah2" PACKAGE))) (EXPORT BLAH2 PACKAGE)) (LIST (SORT (LOOP FOR SYM BEING EACH PRESENT-SYMBOL OF PACKAGE FOR SYM-NAME = (SYMBOL-NAME SYM) COLLECT SYM-NAME) (FUNCTION STRING<)) (SORT (LOOP FOR SYM BEING EACH EXTERNAL-SYMBOL OF PACKAGE FOR SYM-NAME = (SYMBOL-NAME SYM) COLLECT SYM-NAME) (FUNCTION STRING<))))
-Should be: (("blah" "blah2") ("blah2"))
-SBCL: (("blah") ("blah2"))
- * (LET ((X 1)) (LOOP FOR I BY (INCF X) FROM X TO 10 COLLECT I))
- doesn't work -- SBCL's LOOP says BY isn't allowed in a FOR clause.
-
50:
type system errors reported by Peter Van Eynde July 25, 2000:
- a: (SUBTYPEP 'BIGNUM 'INTEGER) => NIL, NIL
- but should be (VALUES T T) instead.
- b: (SUBTYPEP 'EXTENDED-CHAR 'CHARACTER) => NIL, NIL
- but should be (VALUES T T) instead.
c: (SUBTYPEP '(INTEGER (0) (0)) 'NIL) dies with nested errors.
d: In general, the system doesn't like '(INTEGER (0) (0)) -- it
blows up at the level of SPECIFIER-TYPE with
"Component type for Complex is not numeric: (EQL 0)."
This might be easy to fix; the type system already knows
that (SUBTYPEP '(EQL 0) 'NUMBER) is true.
- f: The type system doesn't know about the condition system,
- so that e.g. (TYPEP 'SIMPLE-ERROR 'ERROR)=>NIL.
g: The type system isn't all that smart about relationships
between hairy types, as shown in the type.erg test results,
e.g. (SUBTYPEP 'CONS '(NOT ATOM)) => NIL, NIL.
need to document exactly what metaobject protocol specification
we're following -- the current code is just inherited from PCL.)
-53:
- another error from Peter Van Eynde 5 September 2000:
- (FORMAT NIL "~F" "FOO") should work, but instead reports an error.
- PVE submitted a patch to deal with this bug, but it exposes other
- comparably serious bugs, so I didn't apply it. It looks as though
- the FORMAT code needs a fair amount of rewriting in order to comply
- with the various details of the ANSI spec.
-
54:
The implementation of #'+ returns its single argument without
type checking, e.g. (+ "illegal") => "illegal".
-55:
- In sbcl-0.6.7, there is no doc string for CL:PUSH, probably
- because it's defined with the DEFMACRO-MUNDANELY macro and something
- is wrong with doc string setting in that macro.
-
56:
Attempting to use COMPILE on something defined by DEFMACRO fails:
(DEFMACRO FOO (X) (CONS X X))
CLOS methods, and then expressing the solutions to stuff like this
should become much more straightforward. -- WHN 2001-03-14
-59:
- CL:*DEFAULT-PATHNAME-DEFAULTS* doesn't behave as ANSI suggests (reflecting
- current working directory). And there's no supported way to update
- or query the current working directory (a la Unix "chdir" and "pwd"),
- which is functionality that ILISP needs (and currently gets with low-level
- hacks).
- When this is fixed, probably the more-or-less-parallel Unix-level
- hacks
- DEFAULT-DIRECTORY
- %SET-DEFAULT-DIRECTORY
- etc.?
- should go away. Also we need to figure out what's the proper way to
- deal with the interaction of users assigning new values to
- *DEFAULT-PATHNAME-DEFAULTS* and cores being saved and restored.
- (Perhaps just make restoring from a save always overwrite the old
- value with the new Unix-level default directory?)
-
60:
The debugger LIST-LOCATIONS command doesn't work properly.
rightward of the correct location.
65:
- (probably related to bug #70)
+ (probably related to bug #70; maybe related to bug #109)
As reported by Carl Witty on submit@bugs.debian.org 1999-05-08,
compiling this file
(in-package "CL-USER")
or at least issue a warning.
70:
- (probably related to bug #65)
+ (probably related to bug #65; maybe related to bug #109)
The compiler doesn't like &OPTIONAL arguments in LABELS and FLET
forms. E.g.
(DEFUN FIND-BEFORE (ITEM SEQUENCE &KEY (TEST #'EQL))
72:
(DECLAIM (OPTIMIZE ..)) doesn't work properly inside LOCALLY forms.
-74:
- As noted in the ANSI specification for COERCE, (COERCE 3 'COMPLEX)
- gives a result which isn't COMPLEX. The result type optimizer
- for COERCE doesn't know this, perhaps because it was written before
- ANSI threw this curveball: the optimizer thinks that COERCE always
- returns a result of the specified type. Thus while the interpreted
- function
- (DEFUN TRICKY (X) (TYPEP (COERCE X 'COMPLEX) 'COMPLEX))
- returns the correct result,
- (TRICKY 3) => NIL
- the compiled function
- (COMPILE 'TRICKY)
- does not:
- (TRICKY 3) => T
-
75:
As reported by Martin Atzmueller on sbcl-devel 26 Dec 2000,
ANSI says that WITH-OUTPUT-TO-STRING should have a keyword
LOAD-FOREIGN, and (2) hunt for any other code which uses temporary
files and make it share the same new safe logic.
-80:
- (fixed early Feb 2001 by MNA)
-
-81:
- As reported by wbuss@TELDA.NET (Wolfhard Buss) on cmucl-help
- 2001-02-14,
- According to CLHS
- (loop with (a . b) of-type float = '(0.0 . 1.0)
- and (c . d) of-type float = '(2.0 . 3.0)
- return (list a b c d))
- should evaluate to (0.0 1.0 2.0 3.0). cmucl-18c disagrees and
- invokes the debugger: "B is not of type list".
- SBCL does the same thing.
-
82:
Functions are assigned names based on the context in which they're
defined. This is less than ideal for the functions which are
the first time around, until regression tests are written I'm not
comfortable merging the patches in the CVS version of SBCL.
-101:
- The error message for calls to structure accessors with the
- wrong number of arguments is confusing and of the wrong
- condition class (TYPE-ERROR instead of PROGRAM-ERROR):
- * (defstruct foo x y)
- * (foo-x)
- debugger invoked on condition of type SIMPLE-TYPE-ERROR:
- Structure for accessor FOO-X is not a FOO:
- 301988783
-
102:
As reported by Arthur Lemmens sbcl-devel 2001-05-05, ANSI
requires that SYMBOL-MACROLET refuse to rebind special variables,
As of sbcl-0.6.12.x, this dependence on the nonconforming behavior
has been fixed, but the nonconforming behavior remains.)
-103:
- As reported by Arthur Lemmens sbcl-devel 2001-05-05, ANSI's
- definition of (LOOP .. DO ..) requires that the terms following
- DO all be compound forms. SBCL's implementation of LOOP allows
- non-compound forms (like the bare symbol COUNT, in his example)
- here.
-
104:
(DESCRIBE 'SB-ALIEN:DEF-ALIEN-TYPE) reports the macro argument list
incorrectly:
106:
(reported by Eric Marsden on cmucl-imp 2001-06-15)
- Executing
- (TYPEP 0 '(COMPLEX (EQL 0)))
- signals an error in sbcl-0.6.12.34,
- The component type for COMPLEX is not numeric: (EQL 0)
- This is funny since sbcl-0.6.12.34 knows
- (SUBTYPEP '(EQL 0) 'NUMBER) => T
-
-107:
- (reported as a CMU CL bug by Erik Naggum on comp.lang.lisp
- 2001-06-11:)
- * (write #*101 :radix t :base 36)
- #*#36r1#36r0#36r1
- #*101
- *
-
+ (and APD pointed out on sbcl-devel 2001-12-29 that it's the same
+ as bug 50e)
+
108:
(TIME (ROOM T)) reports more than 200 Mbytes consed even for
a clean, just-started SBCL system. And it seems to be right:
time trying to GC afterwards. Surely there's some more economical
way to implement (ROOM T).
+109:
+ reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
+ collection:
+ ;;; This file fails to compile.
+ ;;; Maybe this bug is related to bugs #65, #70 in the BUGS file.
+ (in-package :cl-user)
+ (defun tst2 ()
+ (labels
+ ((eff (&key trouble)
+ (eff)
+ ;; nil
+ ;; Uncomment and it works
+ ))
+ (eff)))
+ In SBCL 0.6.12.42, the problem is
+ internal error, failed AVER:
+ "(COMMON-LISP:EQ (SB!C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET SB!C::CALLER)
+ (SB!C::LAMBDA-TAIL-SET (SB!C::LAMBDA-HOME SB!C::CALLEE)))"
+
+110:
+ reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
+ collection:
+ ;;; The compiler is flushing the argument type test, and the default
+ ;;; case in the cond, so that calling with say a fixnum 0 causes a
+ ;;; SIGBUS.
+ (declaim (optimize (safety 2) (speed 3)))
+ (defun tst (x)
+ (declare (type (or string stream) x))
+ (cond ((typep x 'string) 'string)
+ ((typep x 'stream) 'stream)
+ (t
+ 'none)))
+ The symptom in sbcl-0.6.12.42 on OpenBSD is actually (TST 0)=>STREAM
+ (not the SIGBUS reported in the comment) but that's broken too;
+ type declarations are supposed to be treated as assertions unless
+ SAFETY 0, so we should be getting a TYPE-ERROR.
+
+111:
+ reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
+ collection:
+ (in-package :cl-user)
+ ;;; Produces an assertion failures when compiled.
+ (defun foo (z)
+ (declare (type (or (function (t) t) null) z))
+ (let ((z (or z #'identity)))
+ (declare (type (function (t) t) z))
+ (funcall z 1)))
+ The error in sbcl-0.6.12.42 is
+ internal error, failed AVER:
+ "(COMMON-LISP:NOT (COMMON-LISP:EQ SB!C::CHECK COMMON-LISP:T))"
+
+112:
+ reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; taken from CMU CL bugs
+ collection; apparently originally reported by Bruno Haible
+ (in-package :cl-user)
+ ;;; From: Bruno Haible
+ ;;; Subject: scope of SPECIAL declarations
+ ;;; It seems CMUCL has a bug relating to the scope of SPECIAL
+ ;;; declarations. I observe this with "CMU Common Lisp 18a x86-linux
+ ;;; 1.4.0 cvs".
+ (let ((x 0))
+ (declare (special x))
+ (let ((x 1))
+ (let ((y x))
+ (declare (special x)) y)))
+ ;;; Gives: 0 (this should return 1 according to CLHS)
+ (let ((x 0))
+ (declare (special x))
+ (let ((x 1))
+ (let ((y x) (x 5))
+ (declare (special x)) y)))
+ ;;; Gives: 1 (correct).
+ The reported results match what we get from the interpreter
+ in sbcl-0.6.12.42.
+
+113:
+ reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
+ collection:
+ (in-package :cl-user)
+ ;;; From: David Gadbois <gadbois@cyc.com>
+ ;;;
+ ;;; Logical pathnames aren't externalizable.
+ ;;; Test case:
+ (let ((tempfile "/tmp/test.lisp"))
+ (setf (logical-pathname-translations "XXX")
+ '(("XXX:**;*.*" "/tmp/**/*.*")))
+ (with-open-file (out tempfile :direction :output)
+ (write-string "(defvar *path* #P\"XXX:XXX;FOO.LISP\")" out))
+ (compile-file tempfile))
+ The error message in sbcl-0.6.12.42 is
+ ; caught ERROR:
+ ; (while making load form for #<SB-IMPL::LOGICAL-HOST "XXX">)
+ ; A logical host can't be dumped as a constant: #<SB-IMPL::LOGICAL-HOST "XXX">
+
+115:
+ reported by Martin Atzmueller 2001-06-25; originally from CMU CL bugs
+ collection:
+ (in-package :cl-user)
+ ;;; The following invokes a compiler error.
+ (declaim (optimize (speed 2) (debug 3)))
+ (defun tst ()
+ (flet ((m1 ()
+ (unwind-protect nil)))
+ (if (catch nil)
+ (m1)
+ (m1))))
+ The error message in sbcl-0.6.12.42 is
+ internal error, failed AVER:
+ "(COMMON-LISP:EQ (SB!C::TN-ENVIRONMENT SB!C:TN) SB!C::TN-ENV)"
+
+117:
+ When the compiler inline expands functions, it may be that different
+ kinds of return values are generated from different code branches.
+ E.g. an inline expansion of POSITION generates integer results
+ from one branch, and NIL results from another. When that inline
+ expansion is used in a context where only one of those results
+ is acceptable, e.g.
+ (defun foo (x)
+ (aref *a1* (position x *a2*)))
+ and the compiler can't prove that the unacceptable branch is
+ never taken, then bogus type mismatch warnings can be generated.
+ If you need to suppress the type mismatch warnings, you can
+ suppress the inline expansion,
+ (defun foo (x)
+ #+sbcl (declare (notinline position)) ; to suppress bug 117 bogowarnings
+ (aref *a1* (position x *a2*)))
+ or, sometimes, suppress them by declaring the result to be of an
+ appropriate type,
+ (defun foo (x)
+ (aref *a1* (the integer (position x *a2*))))
+
+ This is not a new compiler problem in 0.7.0, but the new compiler
+ transforms for FIND, POSITION, FIND-IF, and POSITION-IF make it
+ more conspicuous. If you don't need performance from these functions,
+ and the bogus warnings are a nuisance for you, you can return to
+ your pre-0.7.0 state of grace with
+ #+sbcl (declaim (notinline find position find-if position-if)) ; bug 117..
+
+118:
+ as reported by Eric Marsden on cmucl-imp@cons.org 2001-08-14:
+ (= (FLOAT 1 DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON)
+ (+ (FLOAT 1 DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON) DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON)) => T
+ when of course it should be NIL. (He says it only fails for X86,
+ not SPARC; dunno about Alpha.)
+
+ Also, "the same problem exists for LONG-FLOAT-EPSILON,
+ DOUBLE-FLOAT-NEGATIVE-EPSILON, LONG-FLOAT-NEGATIVE-EPSILON (though
+ for the -negative- the + is replaced by a - in the test)."
+
+ Raymond Toy comments that this is tricky on the X86 since its FPU
+ uses 80-bit precision internally.
+
+120a:
+ The compiler incorrectly figures the return type of
+ (DEFUN FOO (FRAME UP-FRAME)
+ (IF (OR (NOT FRAME)
+ T)
+ FRAME
+ "BAR"))
+ as NIL.
+
+ This problem exists in CMU CL 18c too. When I reported it on
+ cmucl-imp@cons.org, Raymond Toy replied 23 Aug 2001 with
+ a partial explanation, but no fix has been found yet.
+
+120b:
+ Even in sbcl-0.pre7.x, which is supposed to be free of the old
+ non-ANSI behavior of treating the function return type inferred
+ from the current function definition as a declaration of the
+ return type from any function of that name, the return type of NIL
+ is attached to FOO in 120a above, and used to optimize code which
+ calls FOO.
+
+122:
+ There was some sort of screwup in handling of
+ (IF (NOT (IGNORE-ERRORS ..))). E.g.
+ (defun foo1i ()
+ (if (not (ignore-errors
+ (make-pathname :host "foo" :directory "!bla" :name "bar")))
+ (print "ok")
+ (error "notunlessnot")))
+ The (NOT (IGNORE-ERRORS ..)) form evaluates to T, so this should be
+ printing "ok", but instead it's going to the ERROR. This problem
+ seems to've been introduced by MNA's HANDLER-CASE patch (sbcl-devel
+ 2001-07-17) and as a workaround (put in sbcl-0.pre7.14.flaky4.12)
+ I reverted back to the old weird HANDLER-CASE code. However, I
+ think the problem looks like a compiler bug in handling RETURN-FROM,
+ so I left the MNA-patched code in HANDLER-CASE (suppressed with
+ #+NIL) and I'd like to go back to see whether this really is
+ a compiler bug before I delete this BUGS entry.
+
+123:
+ The *USE-IMPLEMENTATION-TYPES* hack causes bugs, particularly
+ (IN-PACKAGE :SB-KERNEL)
+ (TYPE= (SPECIFIER-TYPE '(VECTOR T))
+ (SPECIFIER-TYPE '(VECTOR UNDEFTYPE)))
+ Then because of this, the compiler bogusly optimizes
+ (TYPEP #(11) '(SIMPLE-ARRAY UNDEF-TYPE 1))
+ to T. Unfortunately, just setting *USE-IMPLEMENTATION-TYPES* to
+ NIL around sbcl-0.pre7.14.flaky4.12 didn't work: the compiler complained
+ about type mismatches (probably harmlessly, another instance of bug 117);
+ and then cold init died with a segmentation fault.
+
+124:
+ As of version 0.pre7.14, SBCL's implementation of MACROLET makes
+ the entire lexical environment at the point of MACROLET available
+ in the bodies of the macroexpander functions. In particular, it
+ allows the function bodies (which run at compile time) to try to
+ access lexical variables (which are only defined at runtime).
+ It doesn't even issue a warning, which is bad.
+
+ The SBCL behavior arguably conforms to the ANSI spec (since the
+ spec says that the behavior is undefined, ergo anything conforms).
+ However, it would be better to issue a compile-time error.
+ Unfortunately I (WHN) don't see any simple way to detect this
+ condition in order to issue such an error, so for the meantime
+ SBCL just does this weird broken "conforming" thing.
+
+ The ANSI standard says, in the definition of the special operator
+ MACROLET,
+ The macro-expansion functions defined by MACROLET are defined
+ in the lexical environment in which the MACROLET form appears.
+ Declarations and MACROLET and SYMBOL-MACROLET definitions affect
+ the local macro definitions in a MACROLET, but the consequences
+ are undefined if the local macro definitions reference any
+ local variable or function bindings that are visible in that
+ lexical environment.
+ Then it seems to contradict itself by giving the example
+ (defun foo (x flag)
+ (macrolet ((fudge (z)
+ ;The parameters x and flag are not accessible
+ ; at this point; a reference to flag would be to
+ ; the global variable of that name.
+ ` (if flag (* ,z ,z) ,z)))
+ ;The parameters x and flag are accessible here.
+ (+ x
+ (fudge x)
+ (fudge (+ x 1)))))
+ The comment "a reference to flag would be to the global variable
+ of the same name" sounds like good behavior for the system to have.
+ but actual specification quoted above says that the actual behavior
+ is undefined.
+
+125:
+ (as reported by Gabe Garza on cmucl-help 2001-09-21)
+ (defvar *tmp* 3)
+ (defun test-pred (x y)
+ (eq x y))
+ (defun test-case ()
+ (let* ((x *tmp*)
+ (func (lambda () x)))
+ (print (eq func func))
+ (print (test-pred func func))
+ (delete func (list func))))
+ Now calling (TEST-CASE) gives output
+ NIL
+ NIL
+ (#<FUNCTION {500A9EF9}>)
+ Evidently Python thinks of the lambda as a code transformation so
+ much that it forgets that it's also an object.
+
+126:
+ (fixed in 0.pre7.41)
+
+127:
+ The DEFSTRUCT section of the ANSI spec, in the :CONC-NAME section,
+ specifies a precedence rule for name collisions between slot accessors of
+ structure classes related by inheritance. As of 0.7.0, SBCL still
+ doesn't follow it.
+
+129:
+ insufficient syntax checking in MACROLET:
+ (defun foo (x)
+ (macrolet ((defmacro bar (z) `(+ z z)))
+ (bar x)))
+ shouldn't compile without error (because of the extra DEFMACRO symbol).
+
+130:
+ reported by Alexey Dejneka on sbcl-devel 2001-11-03
+ (defun x (x)
+ "Return X if X is a non-negative integer."
+ (let ((step (lambda (%funcall)
+ (lambda (n)
+ (cond ((= n 0) 0)
+ (t (1+ (funcall %funcall (1- n)))))))))
+ (funcall
+ ((lambda (a)
+ (funcall step (lambda (n)
+ (funcall (funcall a a) n))))
+ (lambda (a)
+ (funcall step (lambda (n)
+ (funcall (funcall a a) n)))))
+ x)))
+ This function returns its argument. But after removing percents it
+ does not work: "Result of (1- n) is not a function".
+
+131:
+ As of sbcl-0.pre7.86.flaky7.3, the cross-compiler, and probably
+ the CL:COMPILE function (which is based on the same %COMPILE
+ mechanism) get confused by
+(defun sxhash (x)
+ (labels ((sxhash-number (x)
+ (etypecase x
+ (fixnum (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
+ (integer (sb!bignum:sxhash-bignum x))
+ (single-float (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
+ (double-float (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
+ #!+long-float (long-float (error "stub: no LONG-FLOAT"))
+ (ratio (let ((result 127810327))
+ (declare (type fixnum result))
+ (mixf result (sxhash-number (numerator x)))
+ (mixf result (sxhash-number (denominator x)))
+ result))
+ (complex (let ((result 535698211))
+ (declare (type fixnum result))
+ (mixf result (sxhash-number (realpart x)))
+ (mixf result (sxhash-number (imagpart x)))
+ result))))
+ (sxhash-recurse (x &optional (depthoid +max-hash-depthoid+))
+ (declare (type index depthoid))
+ (typecase x
+ (list
+ (if (plusp depthoid)
+ (mix (sxhash-recurse (car x) (1- depthoid))
+ (sxhash-recurse (cdr x) (1- depthoid)))
+ 261835505))
+ (instance
+ (if (typep x 'structure-object)
+ (logxor 422371266
+ (sxhash ; through DEFTRANSFORM
+ (class-name (layout-class (%instance-layout x)))))
+ 309518995))
+ (symbol (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
+ (number (sxhash-number x))
+ (array
+ (typecase x
+ (simple-string (sxhash x)) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
+ (string (%sxhash-substring x))
+ (bit-vector (let ((result 410823708))
+ (declare (type fixnum result))
+ (dotimes (i (min depthoid (length x)))
+ (mixf result (aref x i)))
+ result))
+ (t (logxor 191020317 (sxhash (array-rank x))))))
+ (character
+ (logxor 72185131
+ (sxhash (char-code x)))) ; through DEFTRANSFORM
+ (t 42))))
+ (sxhash-recurse x)))
+ complaining "function called with two arguments, but wants exactly
+ one" about SXHASH-RECURSE. (This might not be strictly a new bug,
+ since IIRC post-fork CMU CL has also had problems with &OPTIONAL
+ arguments in FLET/LABELS: it might be an old Python bug which is
+ only exercised by the new arrangement of the SBCL compiler.)
+
+132:
+ Trying to compile
+ (DEFUN FOO () (CATCH 0 (PRINT 1331)))
+ gives an error
+ #<SB-C:TN '0!1> is not valid as the second argument to VOP:
+ SB-C:MAKE-CATCH-BLOCK,
+ since the TN's primitive type SB-VM::POSITIVE-FIXNUM doesn't allow
+ any of the SCs allowed by the operand restriction:
+ (SB-VM::DESCRIPTOR-REG)
+ The (CATCH 0 ...) construct is bad style (because of unportability
+ of EQ testing of numbers) but it is legal, and shouldn't cause an
+ internal compiler error. (This error occurs in sbcl-0.6.13 and in
+ 0.pre7.86.flaky7.14.)
+
+133:
+ Trying to compile something like
+ (sb!alien:def-alien-routine "breakpoint_remove" sb!c-call:void
+ (code-obj sb!c-call:unsigned-long)
+ (pc-offset sb!c-call:int)
+ (old-inst sb!c-call:unsigned-long))
+ in SBCL-0.pre7.86.flaky7.22 after warm init fails with an error
+ cannot use values types here
+ probably because the SB-C-CALL:VOID type gets translated to (VALUES).
+ It should be valid to use VOID for a function return type, so perhaps
+ instead of calling SPECIFIER-TYPE (which excludes all VALUES types
+ automatically) we should call VALUES-SPECIFIER-TYPE and handle VALUES
+ types manually, allowing the special case (VALUES) but still excluding
+ all more-complex VALUES types.
+
+135:
+ Ideally, uninterning a symbol would allow it, and its associated
+ FDEFINITION and PROCLAIM data, to be reclaimed by the GC. However,
+ at least as of sbcl-0.7.0, this isn't the case. Information about
+ FDEFINITIONs and PROCLAIMed properties is stored in globaldb.lisp
+ essentially in ordinary (non-weak) hash tables keyed by symbols.
+ Thus, once a system has an entry in this system, it tends to live
+ forever, even when it is uninterned and all other references to it
+ are lost.
+
+136:
+ (reported by Arnaud Rouanet on cmucl-imp 2001-12-18)
+ (defmethod foo ((x integer))
+ x)
+ (defmethod foo :around ((x integer))
+ (let ((x (1+ x)))
+ (call-next-method)))
+ Now (FOO 3) should return 3, but instead it returns 4.
+
+137:
+ (SB-DEBUG:BACKTRACE) output should start with something
+ including the name BACKTRACE, not (as in 0.pre7.88)
+ just "0: (\"hairy arg processor\" ...)". Until about
+ sbcl-0.pre7.109, the names in BACKTRACE were all screwed
+ up compared to the nice useful names in sbcl-0.6.13.
+ Around sbcl-0.pre7.109, they were mostly fixed by using
+ NAMED-LAMBDA to implement DEFUN. However, there are still
+ some screwups left, e.g. as of sbcl-0.pre7.109, there are
+ still some functions named "hairy arg processor" and
+ "SB-INT:&MORE processor".
+
+138:
+ a pair of cross-compiler bugs in sbcl-0.pre7.107
+
+138a:
+ $ cat > /tmp/bug138.lisp << EOF
+ (in-package "SB!KERNEL")
+ (defun f-c-l (name parent-types)
+ (let* ((cpl (mapcar (lambda (x)
+ (condition-class-cpl x))
+ parent-types))
+ (new-inherits
+ (concatenate 'simple-vector
+ (layout-inherits cond-layout))))
+ (if (not (mismatch (layout-inherits olayout) new-inherits))
+ olayout
+ (make-layout))))
+ EOF
+ $ sbcl --core output/after-xc.core
+ ...
+ * (target-compile-file "/tmp/bug138.lisp")
+ ...
+ internal error, failed AVER:
+ "(COMMON-LISP:MEMBER SB!C::FUN (SB!C::COMPONENT-LAMBDAS SB!C:COMPONENT))"
+
+ It seems as though this xc bug is likely to correspond to a bug in the
+ ordinary compiler, but I haven't yet found a test case which causes
+ this problem in the ordinary compiler.
+
+ related weirdness: Using #'(LAMBDA (X) ...) instead of (LAMBDA (X) ...)
+ makes the assertion failure go away.
+
+138b:
+ Even when you relax the AVER that fails in 138a, there's another
+ problem cross-compiling the same code:
+ internal error, failed AVER:
+ "(COMMON-LISP:ZEROP
+ (COMMON-LISP:HASH-TABLE-COUNT
+ (SB!FASL::FASL-OUTPUT-PATCH-TABLE SB!FASL:FASL-OUTPUT)))"
+
+ The same problem appears in the simpler test case
+ (in-package "SB!KERNEL")
+ (defun f-c-l ()
+ (let ((cpl (foo (lambda (x)
+ (condition-class-cpl x))))
+ (new-inherits (layout-inherits cond-layout)))
+ (layout-inherits olayout)))
+
+ Changing CONDITION-CLASS-CPL or (either of the calls to) LAYOUT-INHERITS
+ to arbitrary nonmagic not-defined-yet just-do-a-full-call functions makes
+ the problem go away. Also, even in this simpler test case which fails
+ on a very different AVER, the 138a weirdness about s/(lambda/#'(lambda/
+ making the problem go away is preserved.
+
+ I still haven't found any way to make this happen in the ordinary
+ (not cross-) SBCL compiler, nor in CMU CL.
+
+138c:
+ In sbcl-0.pre7.111 I added an assertion upstream, in IR2-CONVERT-CLOSURE,
+ which fails for the test case above but doesn't keep the system
+ from cross-compiling itself or passing its tests.
+
+ I traced IR1-CONVERT-LAMBDA (with :PRINT *CURRENT-COMPONENT*)
+ and tracing various COMPONENT-manipulating functions like
+ FIND-INITIAL-DFO, DFO-SCAVENGE-DEPENDENCY-GRAPH,
+ JOIN-COMPONENTS, LOCALL-ANALYZE-COMPONENT, etc. From that,
+ it looks as though the problem is that IR1-CONVERT-LAMBDA
+ is being called by MAKE-EXTERNAL-ENTRY-POINT to
+ create the mislaid LAMBDA in an environment set up by
+ WITH-BELATED-IR1-ENVIRONMENT which has *CURRENT-COMPONENT* set
+ to a component which is never seen again, and specifically never
+ passed to LOCALL-ANALYZE-COMPONENT or JOIN-COMPONENTS, so that
+ its NEW-FUNS list (where the mislaid LAMBDA is waiting patiently)
+ gets lost. Thus, the LAMBDA is essentially being written into never
+ never land. But I haven't figured out why. *CURRENT-COMPONENT* is set
+ wrong? Something later on is dropping the ball and neglecting
+ to look at all the components it should? Something else?
+
+139:
+ In sbcl-0.pre7.107, (DIRECTORY "*.*") is broken, as reported by
+ Nathan Froyd sbcl-devel 2001-12-28.
+
+ Christophe Rhodes suggested (sbcl-devel 2001-12-30) converting
+ the MERGED-PATHNAME expression in DEFUN DIRECTORY to
+ (merged-pathname (merge-pathnames pathname
+ *default-pathname-defaults*))
+ This looks right, and fixes this bug, but it interacts with the NODES
+ logic in %ENUMERATE-PATHNAMES to create a new bug, so that
+ (DIRECTORY "../**/*.*") no longer shows files in the current working
+ directory. Probably %ENUMERATE-PATHNAMES (or related logic like
+ %ENUMERATE-MATCHES) needs to be patched as well.
+
+ Note: The MERGED-PATHNAME change changes behavior incompatibly,
+ making e.g. (DIRECTORY "*") no longer equivalent to (DIRECTORY "*.*"),
+ so deserves a NEWS entry. E.g.
+* minor incompatible change (part of a bug fix by Christophe Rhodes
+ to DIRECTORY behavior): DIRECTORY no longer implicitly promotes
+ NIL slots of its pathname argument to :WILD, and in particular
+ asking for the contents of a directory, which you used to be able
+ to do without explicit wildcards, e.g. (DIRECTORY "/tmp/"),
+ now needs explicit wildcards, e.g. (DIRECTORY "/tmp/*.*").
+
+140:
+ (reported by Alexey Dejneka sbcl-devel 2002-01-03)
+
+ SUBTYPEP does not work well with redefined classes:
+ ---
+ * (defclass a () ())
+ #<STANDARD-CLASS A>
+ * (defclass b () ())
+ #<STANDARD-CLASS B>
+ * (subtypep 'b 'a)
+ NIL
+ T
+ * (defclass b (a) ())
+ #<STANDARD-CLASS B>
+ * (subtypep 'b 'a)
+ T
+ T
+ * (defclass b () ())
+ #<STANDARD-CLASS B>
+
+ ;;; And now...
+ * (subtypep 'b 'a)
+ T
+ T
+
+
KNOWN BUGS RELATED TO THE IR1 INTERPRETER
-(Note: At some point, the pure interpreter (actually a semi-pure
-interpreter aka "the IR1 interpreter") will probably go away, replaced
-by constructs like
- (DEFUN EVAL (X) (FUNCALL (COMPILE NIL (LAMBDA ..)))))
-and at that time these bugs should either go away automatically or
-become more tractable to fix. Until then, they'll probably remain,
-since some of them aren't considered urgent, and the rest are too hard
-to fix as long as so many special cases remain. After the IR1
-interpreter goes away is also the preferred time to start
-systematically exterminating cases where debugging functionality
-(backtrace, breakpoint, etc.) breaks down, since getting rid of the
-IR1 interpreter will reduce the number of special cases we need to
-support.)
-
-IR1-1:
- The FUNCTION special operator doesn't check properly whether its
- argument is a function name. E.g. (FUNCTION (X Y)) returns a value
- instead of failing with an error. (Later attempting to funcall the
- value does cause an error.)
-
-IR1-2:
- COMPILED-FUNCTION-P bogusly reports T for interpreted functions:
- * (DEFUN FOO (X) (- 12 X))
- FOO
- * (COMPILED-FUNCTION-P #'FOO)
- T
-
-IR1-3:
- Executing
- (DEFVAR *SUPPRESS-P* T)
- (EVAL '(UNLESS *SUPPRESS-P*
- (EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL :LOAD-TOPLEVEL :EXECUTE)
- (FORMAT T "surprise!"))))
- prints "surprise!". Probably the entire EVAL-WHEN mechanism ought to be
- rewritten from scratch to conform to the ANSI definition, abandoning
- the *ALREADY-EVALED-THIS* hack which is used in sbcl-0.6.8.9 (and
- in the original CMU CL source, too). This should be easier to do --
- though still nontrivial -- once the various IR1 interpreter special
- cases are gone.
-
-IR1-3a:
- EVAL-WHEN's idea of what's a toplevel form is even more screwed up
- than the example in IR1-3 would suggest, since COMPILE-FILE and
- COMPILE both print both "right now!" messages when compiling the
- following code,
- (LAMBDA (X)
- (COND (X
- (EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL :LOAD-TOPLEVEL :EXECUTE)
- (PRINT "yes! right now!"))
- "yes!")
- (T
- (EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL :LOAD-TOPLEVEL :EXECUTE)
- (PRINT "no! right now!"))
- "no!")))
- and while EVAL doesn't print the "right now!" messages, the first
- FUNCALL on the value returned by EVAL causes both of them to be printed.
+(Now that the IR1 interpreter has gone away, these should be
+relatively straightforward to fix.)
IR1-4:
The system accepts DECLAIM in most places where DECLARE would be
EVAL-WHEN is rewritten, which won't happen until after the IR1
interpreter is gone, the system's notion of what's a top-level form
and what's not will remain too confused to fix this problem.]
+
+IR1-6:
+ (another wishlist thing..) Reimplement DEFMACRO to be basically
+ like DEFMACRO-MUNDANELY, just using EVAL-WHEN.
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff