0.7.10.10:

[sbcl.git] / BUGS

diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS
index fac411c..3c403d6 100644 (file)
--- a/BUGS
+++ b/BUGS
@@ -616,12 +616,6 @@ WORKAROUND:
    Evidently Python thinks of the lambda as a code transformation so
    much that it forgets that it's also an object.
 
-127:
-  The DEFSTRUCT section of the ANSI spec, in the :CONC-NAME section,
-  specifies a precedence rule for name collisions between slot accessors of
-  structure classes related by inheritance. As of 0.7.0, SBCL still 
-  doesn't follow it.
-
 135:
   Ideally, uninterning a symbol would allow it, and its associated
   FDEFINITION and PROCLAIM data, to be reclaimed by the GC. However,
@@ -1046,6 +1040,8 @@ WORKAROUND:
      lexical environment.
   b. The body of (EVAL-WHEN (:COMPILE-TOPLEVEL) ...) is evaluated in
      the null lexical environment.
+  c. The cross-compiler cannot inline functions defined in a non-null
+     lexical environment.
 
 206: ":SB-FLUID feature broken"
   (reported by Antonio Martinez-Shotton sbcl-devel 2002-10-07)
@@ -1267,13 +1263,25 @@ WORKAROUND:
 
 224:
   SBCL 0.7.8 fails to compile
-
-  (localy (declare (optimize (safety 3)))
-          (ignore-errors (progn (values-list (car (list '(1 . 2)))) t)))
-
-226: "AVER failure in COMPILE-FILE of clocc-ansi-test/tests.lisp"
-  (fixed in 0.7.9.54)
-
+    (localy (declare (optimize (safety 3)))
+            (ignore-errors (progn (values-list (car (list '(1 . 2)))) t)))
+  (the LOCALY there is not a typo; any unknown function (e.g. FROB)
+  will do).
+
+228: "function-lambda-expression problems"
+  in sbcl-0.7.9.6x, from the REPL:
+    * (progn (declaim (inline foo)) (defun foo (x) x))
+    FOO
+    * (function-lambda-expression #'foo)
+    (SB-C:LAMBDA-WITH-LEXENV NIL NIL NIL (X) (BLOCK FOO X)), NIL, FOO
+  but this first return value is not suitable for input to FUNCTION or
+  COMPILE, as required by ANSI.
+
+229:
+  (subtypep 'function '(function)) => nil, t.
+
+230:
+  (fixed in 0.7.10.5)
 
 DEFUNCT CATEGORIES OF BUGS
   IR1-#: