0.7.13.24:

[sbcl.git] / BUGS

diff --git a/BUGS b/BUGS
index 1b6c039..4e6b5db 100644 (file)
--- a/BUGS
+++ b/BUGS
@@ -1169,17 +1169,6 @@ WORKAROUND:
 229:
   (subtypep 'function '(function)) => nil, t.
 
-231: "SETQ does not correctly check the type of a variable being set"
-  b.
-    (defun foo (x z)
-      (declare (type integer x))
-      (locally (declare (type (real 1) x))
-        (setq x z))
-      (list x z))
-    (foo 0 0) => (0 0).
-
-  (fixed in 0.7.12.8)
-
 233: bugs in constraint propagation
   a.
   (defun foo (x)
@@ -1203,9 +1192,6 @@ WORKAROUND:
         (+ x 2)))
   (foo 1d0 5) => segmentation violation
 
-234:
-  (fixed in sbcl-0.7.10.36)
-
 235: "type system and inline expansion"
   a.
   (declaim (ftype (function (cons) number) acc))
@@ -1273,24 +1259,7 @@ WORKAROUND:
   compiler gets its hands on the code needing compilation from the REPL,
   it has been macroexpanded several times.
 
-240:
-  "confused lexical/special warnings in MULTIPLE-VALUE-BIND"
-  (from tonyms on #lisp IRC 2003-02-25)
-  In sbcl-0.7.12.55, compiling 
-    (cl:in-package :cl-user)
-    (defvar *foo* 0)
-    (defvar *bar* 1)
-    (defun bar ()
-      (multiple-value-bind (*foo* *bar*) 'eleventy-one
-        (bletch)))
-    (defun bletch () (format t "~&*FOO*=~S *BAR*=~S" *foo* *bar*))
-    (bar)
-  gives warnings like "using the lexical binding of the symbol *FOO*"
-  even though LOADing the fasl file shows that in fact the special
-  bindings are being used.
-
-241:
-  "DEFCLASS mysteriously remembers uninterned accessor names."
+241: "DEFCLASS mysteriously remembers uninterned accessor names."
   (from tonyms on #lisp IRC 2003-02-25)
   In sbcl-0.7.12.55, typing
     (defclass foo () ((bar :accessor foo-bar)))