Perhaps any number of such consecutive lines ought to turn into a
single "compiling top-level forms:" line.
-11:
- It would be nice if the
- caught ERROR:
- (during macroexpansion)
- said what macroexpansion was at fault, e.g.
- caught ERROR:
- (during macroexpansion of IN-PACKAGE,
- during macroexpansion of DEFFOO)
-
19:
(I *think* this is a bug. It certainly seems like strange behavior. But
the ANSI spec is scary, dark, and deep.. -- WHN)
so they could be supported after all. Very likely
SIGCONTEXT-FLOATING-POINT-MODES could now be supported, too.
-45:
- a slew of floating-point-related errors reported by Peter Van Eynde
- on July 25, 2000:
- c: Many expressions generate floating infinity on x86/Linux:
- (/ 1 0.0)
- (/ 1 0.0d0)
- (EXPT 10.0 1000)
- (EXPT 10.0d0 1000)
- PVE's regression tests want them to raise errors. sbcl-0.7.0.5
- on x86/Linux generates the infinities instead. That might or
- might not be conforming behavior, but it's also inconsistent,
- which is almost certainly wrong. (Inconsistency: (/ 1 0.0)
- should give the same result as (/ 1.0 0.0), but instead (/ 1 0.0)
- generates SINGLE-FLOAT-POSITIVE-INFINITY and (/ 1.0 0.0)
- signals an error.
- d: (in section12.erg) various forms a la
- (FLOAT 1 DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON)
- don't give the right behavior.
-
60:
The debugger LIST-LOCATIONS command doesn't work properly.
(How should it work properly?)
(see also bug 279)
-118:
- as reported by Eric Marsden on cmucl-imp@cons.org 2001-08-14:
- (= (FLOAT 1 DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON)
- (+ (FLOAT 1 DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON) DOUBLE-FLOAT-EPSILON)) => T
- when of course it should be NIL. (He says it only fails for X86,
- not SPARC; dunno about Alpha.)
-
- Also, "the same problem exists for LONG-FLOAT-EPSILON,
- DOUBLE-FLOAT-NEGATIVE-EPSILON, LONG-FLOAT-NEGATIVE-EPSILON (though
- for the -negative- the + is replaced by a - in the test)."
-
- Raymond Toy comments that this is tricky on the X86 since its FPU
- uses 80-bit precision internally.
-
- Bruno Haible comments:
- The values are those that are expected for an IEEE double-float
- arithmetic. The problem appears to be that the rounding is not
- IEEE on x86 compliant: namely, values are first rounded to 64
- bits mantissa precision, then only to 53 bits mantissa
- precision. This gives different results than rounding to 53 bits
- mantissa precision in a single step.
-
- The quick "fix", to permanently change the FPU control word from
- 0x037f to 0x027f, will give problems with the fdlibm code that is
- used for computing transcendental functions like sinh() etc.
- so maybe we need to change the FPU control word to that for Lisp
- code, and adjust it to the safe 0x037f for calls to C?
-
124:
As of version 0.pre7.14, SBCL's implementation of MACROLET makes
the entire lexical environment at the point of MACROLET available
forever, even when it is uninterned and all other references to it
are lost.
-141: "pretty printing and backquote"
- a.
- * '``(FOO ,@',@S)
- ``(FOO SB-IMPL::BACKQ-COMMA-AT S)
-
- c. (reported by Paul F. Dietz)
- * '`(lambda ,x)
- `(LAMBDA (SB-IMPL::BACKQ-COMMA X))
-
143:
(reported by Jesse Bouwman 2001-10-24 through the unfortunately
prominent SourceForge web/db bug tracking system, which is
; compilation unit finished
; printed 1 note
-241: "DEFCLASS mysteriously remembers uninterned accessor names."
- (from tonyms on #lisp IRC 2003-02-25)
- In sbcl-0.7.12.55, typing
- (defclass foo () ((bar :accessor foo-bar)))
- (profile foo-bar)
- (unintern 'foo-bar)
- (defclass foo () ((bar :accessor foo-bar)))
- gives the error message
- "#:FOO-BAR already names an ordinary function or a macro."
- So it's somehow checking the uninterned old accessor name instead
- of the new requested accessor name, which seems broken to me (WHN).
-
242: "WRITE-SEQUENCE suboptimality"
(observed from clx performance)
In sbcl-0.7.13, WRITE-SEQUENCE of a sequence of type
(fixed in 0.8.2.51, but a test case would be good)
-276:
- (defmethod fee ((x fixnum))
- (setq x (/ x 2))
- x)
- (fee 1) => type error
-
- (taken from CLOCC)
-
278:
a.
(defun foo ()
(see also bug 117)
-280: bogus WARNING about duplicate function definition
- In sbcl-0.8.3 and sbcl-0.8.1.47, if BS.MIN is defined inline,
- e.g. by
- (declaim (inline bs.min))
- (defun bs.min (bases) nil)
- before compiling the file below, the compiler warns
- Duplicate definition for BS.MIN found in one static
- unit (usually a file).
- when compiling
- (declaim (special *minus* *plus* *stagnant*))
- (defun b.*.min (&optional (x () xp) (y () yp) &rest rest)
- (bs.min avec))
- (define-compiler-macro b.*.min (&rest rest)
- `(bs.min ,@rest))
- (defun afish-d-rbd (pd)
- (if *stagnant*
- (b.*.min (foo-d-rbd *stagnant*))
- (multiple-value-bind (reduce-fn initial-value)
- (etypecase pd
- (list (values #'bs.min 0))
- (vector (values #'bs.min *plus*)))
- (let ((cv-ks (cv (kpd.ks pd))))
- (funcall reduce-fn d-rbds)))))
- (defun bfish-d-rbd (pd)
- (if *stagnant*
- (b.*.min (foo-d-rbd *stagnant*))
- (multiple-value-bind (reduce-fn initial-value)
- (etypecase pd
- (list (values #'bs.min *minus*))
- (vector (values #'bs.min 0)))
- (let ((cv-ks (cv (kpd.ks pd))))
- (funcall reduce-fn d-rbds)))))
-
281: COMPUTE-EFFECTIVE-METHOD error signalling.
(slightly obscured by a non-0 default value for
SB-PCL::*MAX-EMF-PRECOMPUTE-METHODS*)
spurious errors should two threads attempt to tokenise at the same
time.
-312:
- (reported by Jon Dyte)
- SBCL issues a warning "Duplicate definition of FOO" compiling
-
- (declaim (inline foo))
- (defun foo (x)
- (1+ x))
- (defun bar (y)
- (list (foo y) (if (> y 1) (funcall (if (> y 0) #'foo #'identity) y))))
-
- (probably related to the bug 280.)
-
314: "LOOP :INITIALLY clauses and scope of initializers"
reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
test suite, originally by Thomas F. Burdick.
Expected: (2 6 15 38)
Got: ERROR
-315: "no bounds check for access to displaced array"
- reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
- test suite.
- (locally (declare (optimize (safety 3) (speed 0)))
- (let* ((x (make-array 10 :fill-pointer 4 :element-type 'character
- :initial-element #\space :adjustable t))
- (y (make-array 10 :fill-pointer 4 :element-type 'character
- :displaced-to x)))
- (adjust-array x '(5))
- (char y 5)))
-
- SBCL 0.8.10 elides the bounds check somewhere along the line, and
- returns #\Nul (where an error would be much preferable, since a test
- of that form but with (setf (char y 5) #\Space) potentially corrupts
- the heap and certainly confuses the world if that string is used by
- C code.
-
317: "FORMAT of floating point numbers"
reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
test suite.
#(1 2 ((SB-IMPL::|,|) + 2 2) 4)
which probably isn't intentional.
-321: "DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION lambda list parsing"
- reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel "various SBCL bugs" from CLISP
- test suite.
- (define-method-combination w-args ()
- ((method-list *))
- (:arguments arg1 arg2 &aux (extra :extra))
- `(progn ,@(mapcar (lambda (method) `(call-method ,method)) method-list)))
- gives a (caught) compile-time error, which can be exposed by
- (defgeneric mc-test-w-args (p1 p2 s)
- (:method-combination w-args)
- (:method ((p1 number) (p2 t) s)
- (vector-push-extend (list 'number p1 p2) s))
- (:method ((p1 string) (p2 t) s)
- (vector-push-extend (list 'string p1 p2) s))
- (:method ((p1 t) (p2 t) s) (vector-push-extend (list t p1 p2) s)))
-
323: "REPLACE, BIT-BASH and large strings"
The transform for REPLACE on simple-base-strings uses BIT-BASH, which
at present has an upper limit in size. Consequently, in sbcl-0.8.10
to about 1024 (and similarly for signed-byte), so
(open "/dev/zero" :element-type '(unsigned-byte 1025))
gives an error in sbcl-0.8.10.
+
+325: "CLOSE :ABORT T on supeseding streams"
+ Closing a stream opened with :IF-EXISTS :SUPERSEDE with :ABORT T leaves no
+ file on disk, even if one existed before opening.
+
+ The illegality of this is not crystal clear, as the ANSI dictionary
+ entry for CLOSE says that when :ABORT is T superseded files are not
+ superseded (ie. the original should be restored), whereas the OPEN
+ entry says about :IF-EXISTS :SUPERSEDE "If possible, the
+ implementation should not destroy the old file until the new stream
+ is closed." -- implying that even though undesirable, early deletion
+ is legal. Restoring the original would none the less be the polite
+ thing to do.
+
+326: "*PRINT-CIRCLE* crosstalk between streams"
+ In sbcl-0.8.10.48 it's possible for *PRINT-CIRCLE* references to be
+ mixed between streams when output operations are intermingled closely
+ enough (as by doing output on S2 from within (PRINT-OBJECT X S1) in the
+ test case below), so that e.g. the references #2# appears on a stream
+ with no preceding #2= on that stream to define it (because the #2= was
+ sent to another stream).
+ (cl:in-package :cl-user)
+ (defstruct foo index)
+ (defparameter *foo* (make-foo :index 4))
+ (defstruct bar)
+ (defparameter *bar* (make-bar))
+ (defparameter *tangle* (list *foo* *bar* *foo*))
+ (defmethod print-object ((foo foo) stream)
+ (let ((index (foo-index foo)))
+ (format *trace-output*
+ "~&-$- emitting FOO ~D, ambient *BAR*=~S~%"
+ index *bar*)
+ (format stream "[FOO ~D]" index))
+ foo)
+ (let ((tsos (make-string-output-stream))
+ (ssos (make-string-output-stream)))
+ (let ((*print-circle* t)
+ (*trace-output* tsos)
+ (*standard-output* ssos))
+ (prin1 *tangle* *standard-output*))
+ (let ((string (get-output-stream-string ssos)))
+ (unless (string= string "(#1=[FOO 4] #S(BAR) #1#)")
+ ;; In sbcl-0.8.10.48 STRING was "(#1=[FOO 4] #2# #1#)".:-(
+ (error "oops: ~S" string)))))
+ It might be straightforward to fix this by turning the
+ *CIRCULARITY-HASH-TABLE* and *CIRCULARITY-COUNTER* variables into
+ per-stream slots, but (1) it would probably be sort of messy faking
+ up the special variable binding semantics using UNWIND-PROTECT and
+ (2) it might be sort of a pain to test that no other bugs had been
+ introduced.
+
+328: "Profiling generic functions", transplanted from #241
+ (from tonyms on #lisp IRC 2003-02-25)
+ In sbcl-0.7.12.55, typing
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :accessor foo-bar)))
+ (profile foo-bar)
+ (unintern 'foo-bar)
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :accessor foo-bar)))
+ gives the error message
+ "#:FOO-BAR already names an ordinary function or a macro."
+
+ Problem: when a generic function is profiled, it appears as an ordinary
+ function to PCL. (Remembering the uninterned accessor is OK, as the
+ redefinition must be able to remove old accessors from their generic
+ functions.)
+
+329: "Sequential class redefinition"
+ reported by Bruno Haible:
+ (defclass reactor () ((max-temp :initform 10000000)))
+ (defvar *r1* (make-instance 'reactor))
+ (defvar *r2* (make-instance 'reactor))
+ (slot-value *r1* 'max-temp)
+ (slot-value *r2* 'max-temp)
+ (defclass reactor () ((uptime :initform 0)))
+ (slot-value *r1* 'uptime)
+ (defclass reactor () ((uptime :initform 0) (max-temp :initform 10000)))
+ (slot-value *r1* 'max-temp) ; => 10000
+ (slot-value *r2* 'max-temp) ; => 10000000 oops...
+
+ Possible solution:
+ The method effective when the wrapper is obsoleted can be saved
+ in the wrapper, and then to update the instance just run through
+ all the old wrappers in order from oldest to newest.
+
+331: "lazy creation of CLOS classes for user-defined conditions"
+ (defstruct foo)
+ (defstruct (bar (:include foo)))
+ (sb-mop:class-direct-subclasses (find-class 'foo))
+ returns NIL, rather than a singleton list containing the BAR class.
+
+332: "fasl stack inconsistency in structure redefinition"
+ (reported by Tim Daly Jr sbcl-devel 2004-05-06)
+ Even though structure redefinition is undefined by the standard, the
+ following behaviour is suboptimal: running
+ (defun stimulate-sbcl ()
+ (let ((filename (format nil "/tmp/~A.lisp" (gensym))))
+ ;;create a file which redefines a structure incompatibly
+ (with-open-file (f filename :direction :output :if-exists :supersede)
+ (print '(defstruct astruct foo) f)
+ (print '(defstruct astruct foo bar) f))
+ ;;compile and load the file, then invoke the continue restart on
+ ;;the structure redefinition error
+ (handler-bind ((error (lambda (c) (continue c))))
+ (load (compile-file filename)))))
+ (stimulate-sbcl)
+ and choosing the CONTINUE restart yields the message
+ debugger invoked on a SB-INT:BUG in thread 27726:
+ fasl stack not empty when it should be
+
+334: "COMPUTE-SLOTS used to add slots to classes"
+ (reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel 2004-06-01)
+ a. Adding a local slot does not work:
+ (use-package "SB-PCL")
+ (defclass b (a) ())
+ (defmethod compute-slots ((class (eql (find-class 'b))))
+ (append (call-next-method)
+ (list (make-instance 'standard-effective-slot-definition
+ :name 'y
+ :allocation :instance))))
+ (defclass a () ((x :allocation :class)))
+ ;; A should now have a shared slot, X, and a local slot, Y.
+ (mapcar #'slot-definition-location (class-slots (find-class 'b)))
+ yields
+ There is no applicable method for the generic function
+ #<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION CLASS-SLOTS (3)>
+ when called with arguments
+ (NIL).
+
+ b. Adding a class slot does not work:
+ (use-package "SB-PCL")
+ (defclass b (a) ())
+ (defmethod compute-slots ((class (eql (find-class 'b))))
+ (append (call-next-method)
+ (list (make-instance 'standard-effective-slot-definition
+ :name 'y
+ :allocation :class))))
+ (defclass a () ((x :allocation :class)))
+ ;; A should now have two shared slots, X and Y.
+ (mapcar #'slot-definition-location (class-slots (find-class 'b)))
+ yields
+ There is no applicable method for the generic function
+ #<STANDARD-GENERIC-FUNCTION SB-PCL::CLASS-SLOT-CELLS (1)>
+ when called with arguments
+ (NIL).
+
+336: "slot-definitions must retain the generic functions of accessors"
+ reported by Tony Martinez:
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :reader foo-bar)))
+ (defun foo-bar (x) x)
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :reader get-bar))) ; => error, should work
+
+ Note: just punting the accessor removal if the fdefinition
+ is not a generic function is not enough:
+
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :reader foo-bar)))
+ (defvar *reader* #'foo-bar)
+ (defun foo-bar (x) x)
+ (defclass foo () ((bar :initform 'ok :reader get-bar)))
+ (funcall *reader* (make-instance 'foo)) ; should be an error, since
+ ; the method must be removed
+ ; by the class redefinition
+
+ Fixing this should also fix a subset of #328 -- update the
+ description with a new test-case then.
+
+337: MAKE-METHOD and user-defined method classes
+ (reported by Bruno Haible sbcl-devel 2004-06-11)
+
+ In the presence of
+
+(defclass user-method (standard-method) (myslot))
+(defmacro def-user-method (name &rest rest)
+ (let* ((lambdalist-position (position-if #'listp rest))
+ (qualifiers (subseq rest 0 lambdalist-position))
+ (lambdalist (elt rest lambdalist-position))
+ (body (subseq rest (+ lambdalist-position 1)))
+ (required-part
+ (subseq lambdalist 0 (or
+ (position-if
+ (lambda (x) (member x lambda-list-keywords))
+ lambdalist)
+ (length lambdalist))))
+ (specializers (mapcar #'find-class
+ (mapcar (lambda (x) (if (consp x) (second x) t))
+ required-part)))
+ (unspecialized-required-part
+ (mapcar (lambda (x) (if (consp x) (first x) x)) required-part))
+ (unspecialized-lambdalist
+ (append unspecialized-required-part
+ (subseq lambdalist (length required-part)))))
+ `(PROGN
+ (ADD-METHOD #',name
+ (MAKE-INSTANCE 'USER-METHOD
+ :QUALIFIERS ',qualifiers
+ :LAMBDA-LIST ',unspecialized-lambdalist
+ :SPECIALIZERS ',specializers
+ :FUNCTION
+ (LAMBDA (ARGUMENTS NEXT-METHODS-LIST)
+ (FLET ((NEXT-METHOD-P () NEXT-METHODS-LIST)
+ (CALL-NEXT-METHOD (&REST NEW-ARGUMENTS)
+ (UNLESS NEW-ARGUMENTS (SETQ NEW-ARGUMENTS ARGUMENTS))
+ (IF (NULL NEXT-METHODS-LIST)
+ (ERROR "no next method for arguments ~:S" ARGUMENTS)
+ (FUNCALL (SB-PCL:METHOD-FUNCTION
+ (FIRST NEXT-METHODS-LIST))
+ NEW-ARGUMENTS (REST NEXT-METHODS-LIST)))))
+ (APPLY #'(LAMBDA ,unspecialized-lambdalist ,@body) ARGUMENTS)))))
+ ',name)))
+
+ (progn
+ (defgeneric test-um03 (x))
+ (defmethod test-um03 ((x integer))
+ (list* 'integer x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (def-user-method test-um03 ((x rational))
+ (list* 'rational x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um03 ((x real))
+ (list 'real x (not (null (next-method-p)))))
+ (test-um03 17))
+ works, but
+
+ a.(progn
+ (defgeneric test-um10 (x))
+ (defmethod test-um10 ((x integer))
+ (list* 'integer x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um10 ((x rational))
+ (list* 'rational x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um10 ((x real))
+ (list 'real x (not (null (next-method-p)))))
+ (defmethod test-um10 :after ((x real)))
+ (def-user-method test-um10 :around ((x integer))
+ (list* 'around-integer x
+ (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um10 :around ((x rational))
+ (list* 'around-rational x
+ (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um10 :around ((x real))
+ (list* 'around-real x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (test-um10 17))
+ fails with a type error, and
+
+ b.(progn
+ (defgeneric test-um12 (x))
+ (defmethod test-um12 ((x integer))
+ (list* 'integer x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um12 ((x rational))
+ (list* 'rational x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um12 ((x real))
+ (list 'real x (not (null (next-method-p)))))
+ (defmethod test-um12 :after ((x real)))
+ (defmethod test-um12 :around ((x integer))
+ (list* 'around-integer x
+ (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (defmethod test-um12 :around ((x rational))
+ (list* 'around-rational x
+ (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (def-user-method test-um12 :around ((x real))
+ (list* 'around-real x (not (null (next-method-p))) (call-next-method)))
+ (test-um12 17))
+ fails with NO-APPLICABLE-METHOD.
+
+339: "DEFINE-METHOD-COMBINATION bugs"
+ (reported by Bruno Haible via the clisp test suite)
+
+ a. Syntax checking laxity (should produce errors):
+ i. (define-method-combination foo :documentation :operator)
+ ii. (define-method-combination foo :documentation nil)
+ iii. (define-method-combination foo nil)
+ iv. (define-method-combination foo nil nil
+ (:arguments order &aux &key))
+ v. (define-method-combination foo nil nil (:arguments &whole))
+ vi. (define-method-combination foo nil nil (:generic-function))
+ vii. (define-method-combination foo nil nil (:generic-function bar baz))
+ viii. (define-method-combination foo nil nil (:generic-function (bar)))
+ ix. (define-method-combination foo nil ((3)))
+ x. (define-method-combination foo nil ((a)))
+
+ b. define-method-combination arguments lambda list badness
+ i. &aux args are currently unsupported;
+ ii. default values of &optional and &key arguments are ignored;
+ iii. supplied-p variables for &optional and &key arguments are not
+ bound.
+
+ c. qualifier matching incorrect
+ (progn
+ (define-method-combination mc27 ()
+ ((normal ())
+ (ignored (:ignore :unused)))
+ `(list 'result
+ ,@(mapcar #'(lambda (method) `(call-method ,method)) normal)))
+ (defgeneric test-mc27 (x)
+ (:method-combination mc27)
+ (:method :ignore ((x number)) (/ 0)))
+ (test-mc27 7))
+
+ should signal an invalid-method-error, as the :IGNORE (NUMBER)
+ method is applicable, and yet matches neither of the method group
+ qualifier patterns.
+
+340: SETF of VALUES using too many values
+ (reported by Kalle Olavi Niemetalo via the Debian bug system, with
+ bug id #256764)
+
+ (let ((a t) (b t) (c t) (d t))
+ (setf (values (values a b) (values c d)) (values 1 2 3 4))
+ (list a b c d))
+ should return (1 NIL 2 NIL), but under sbcl-0.8.12.x returns
+ (1 2 3 4) instead.
projects / sbcl.git / blobdiff